Deivi Cascante-Sequeira, Fernanda Coelho-Silva, Lucas P Lopes Rosado, Luiza Valdemarca Lucca, Deborah Queiroz Freitas, Sergio Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz, Francisco Haiter-Neto
{"title":"Does cone-beam CT convex triangular field of view influence the image shape distortion of high-density materials?","authors":"Deivi Cascante-Sequeira, Fernanda Coelho-Silva, Lucas P Lopes Rosado, Luiza Valdemarca Lucca, Deborah Queiroz Freitas, Sergio Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz, Francisco Haiter-Neto","doi":"10.1259/dmfr.20230029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the distortion of high-density materials using two CBCT devices presenting convex triangular and cylindrical fields of view (FOVs).</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Four high-density cylinders were individually placed in a polymethylmethacrylate phantom. 192 CBCT scans were acquired using the convex triangular and cylindrical FOVs of Veraviewepocs<sup>®</sup> R100 (R100) and Veraview<sup>®</sup> X800 (X800) devices. Using Horos<sup>TM</sup>'s software, two oral radiologists determined the cylinders' horizontal and vertical dimensional alterations. Nine oral radiologists subjectively identified each cylinder's axial shape distortion. Statistical analysis comprised Multiway ANOVA (α = 5%), and the Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distortion in the axial plane was greater in the convex triangular FOVs for both devices in almost all the materials (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The evaluators subjectively identified a shape distortion in both FOVs for R100 device (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while no distortion was identified for X800 device (<i>p</i> = 0.620). A vertical magnification of all materials was observed in both FOVs for both devices (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No differences among vertical regions (<i>p</i> = 0.988) nor FOVs (<i>p</i> = 0.544) were found for the R100 device, while all materials showed higher magnification in all regions in the cylindrical FOV (<i>p</i> < 0.001) of the X800 device.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The convex triangular FOV influenced the axial distortion of the high-density materials in both devices. A vertical magnification was observed in both FOVs of both devices, but it was greater in the cylindrical FOV of the X800 device.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"20230029"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10968767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20230029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the distortion of high-density materials using two CBCT devices presenting convex triangular and cylindrical fields of view (FOVs).
Methods and materials: Four high-density cylinders were individually placed in a polymethylmethacrylate phantom. 192 CBCT scans were acquired using the convex triangular and cylindrical FOVs of Veraviewepocs® R100 (R100) and Veraview® X800 (X800) devices. Using HorosTM's software, two oral radiologists determined the cylinders' horizontal and vertical dimensional alterations. Nine oral radiologists subjectively identified each cylinder's axial shape distortion. Statistical analysis comprised Multiway ANOVA (α = 5%), and the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Results: The distortion in the axial plane was greater in the convex triangular FOVs for both devices in almost all the materials (p < 0.05). The evaluators subjectively identified a shape distortion in both FOVs for R100 device (p < 0.001), while no distortion was identified for X800 device (p = 0.620). A vertical magnification of all materials was observed in both FOVs for both devices (p < 0.05). No differences among vertical regions (p = 0.988) nor FOVs (p = 0.544) were found for the R100 device, while all materials showed higher magnification in all regions in the cylindrical FOV (p < 0.001) of the X800 device.
Conclusions: The convex triangular FOV influenced the axial distortion of the high-density materials in both devices. A vertical magnification was observed in both FOVs of both devices, but it was greater in the cylindrical FOV of the X800 device.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X