Honoring Uncontrolled Events: Commentary on Slocum et al.

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Perspectives on Behavior Science Pub Date : 2022-06-21 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1007/s40614-022-00345-y
Robert H Horner, Wendy Machalicek
{"title":"Honoring Uncontrolled Events: Commentary on Slocum et al.","authors":"Robert H Horner, Wendy Machalicek","doi":"10.1007/s40614-022-00345-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this special section of <i>Perspectives on Behavior Science</i>, Slocum et al. (2022) provide a summary of the logic and protocol for the construction, implementation, and analysis of single-case multiple-baseline designs. A major contribution of this article is a reassessment of the nonconcurrent multiple baseline design as a credible approach to documenting experimental control. In this commentary we provide considerations for readers as they approach the Slocum et al. article and suggest that although the resurrection of nonconcurrent multiple-baseline designs to a higher status is warranted, researchers will find more control for threats to internal validity in concurrent multiple-baseline designs, and the concurrent format should remain the preferred option.</p>","PeriodicalId":44993,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","volume":"45 3","pages":"639-645"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9458787/pdf/40614_2022_Article_345.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00345-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this special section of Perspectives on Behavior Science, Slocum et al. (2022) provide a summary of the logic and protocol for the construction, implementation, and analysis of single-case multiple-baseline designs. A major contribution of this article is a reassessment of the nonconcurrent multiple baseline design as a credible approach to documenting experimental control. In this commentary we provide considerations for readers as they approach the Slocum et al. article and suggest that although the resurrection of nonconcurrent multiple-baseline designs to a higher status is warranted, researchers will find more control for threats to internal validity in concurrent multiple-baseline designs, and the concurrent format should remain the preferred option.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纪念失控事件:对 Slocum 等人的评论
在《行为科学展望》(Perspectives on Behavior Science)的这一专栏中,Slocum 等人(2022 年)总结了构建、实施和分析单例多基线设计的逻辑和规程。这篇文章的一个主要贡献是重新评估了非并发多基线设计,将其视为记录实验控制的可靠方法。在这篇评论中,我们为读者在阅读 Slocum 等人的文章时提供了一些注意事项,并建议尽管非同期多基线设计有必要重新获得更高的地位,但研究人员会发现同期多基线设计对内部效度的威胁控制更强,因此同期设计仍应是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives on Behavior Science
Perspectives on Behavior Science PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Behavior Science is an official publication of the Association for Behavior Analysis International. It is published quarterly, and in addition to its articles on theoretical, experimental, and applied topics in behavior analysis, this journal also includes literature reviews, re-interpretations of published data, and articles on behaviorism as a philosophy.
期刊最新文献
Challenges to Applied Behavior Analysis: Introduction to the Special Issue. Shapers at Odds: Isolation, Synthesis, and Resulting Division in the Assessment and Treatment of Problem Behavior. In Defense of Applied Behavior Analysis and Evidence-Based Practice. A Tactful Prompt: The Time is Right for Critical Behavioral Studies. I am a Behavior Analyst and an Advocate for ABA: Are you?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1