The Effects of Reflective Pauses on Performance in Simulation Training.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000729
Joy Y Lee, Jeroen Donkers, Halszka Jarodzka, Géraldine Sellenraad, Tjitske J E Faber, Jeroen J G van Merriënboer
{"title":"The Effects of Reflective Pauses on Performance in Simulation Training.","authors":"Joy Y Lee, Jeroen Donkers, Halszka Jarodzka, Géraldine Sellenraad, Tjitske J E Faber, Jeroen J G van Merriënboer","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The reflective pause, taking a pause during performance to reflect, is an important practice in simulation-based learning. However, for novice learners, it is a highly complex self-regulatory skill that cannot stand alone without guidance. Using educational theories, we propose how to design cognitive and metacognitive aids to guide learners with the reflective pause and investigate its effects on performance in a simulation training environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>These effects are examined in four aspects of performance: cognitive load, primary performance, secondary performance, and encapsulation. Medical students ( N = 72) performed tasks in simulation training for emergency medicine, under 2 conditions: reflection condition ( n = 36) where reflection was prompted and guided, and control condition ( n = 36) without such reflection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effects of reflective pauses emerged for 2 aspects of performance: cognitive load decreased and secondary performance improved. However, primary performance and encapsulation did not show significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results demonstrate that reflective pauses with cognitive and metacognitive aids implemented can enhance some aspects of performance. We suggest that to secure these effects, feedback during reflection and an adaptation period should be provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000729","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The reflective pause, taking a pause during performance to reflect, is an important practice in simulation-based learning. However, for novice learners, it is a highly complex self-regulatory skill that cannot stand alone without guidance. Using educational theories, we propose how to design cognitive and metacognitive aids to guide learners with the reflective pause and investigate its effects on performance in a simulation training environment.

Methods: These effects are examined in four aspects of performance: cognitive load, primary performance, secondary performance, and encapsulation. Medical students ( N = 72) performed tasks in simulation training for emergency medicine, under 2 conditions: reflection condition ( n = 36) where reflection was prompted and guided, and control condition ( n = 36) without such reflection.

Results: The effects of reflective pauses emerged for 2 aspects of performance: cognitive load decreased and secondary performance improved. However, primary performance and encapsulation did not show significant difference.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate that reflective pauses with cognitive and metacognitive aids implemented can enhance some aspects of performance. We suggest that to secure these effects, feedback during reflection and an adaptation period should be provided.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟训练中反思性停顿对成绩的影响。
引言:反思性停顿是模拟学习中的一种重要实践。然而,对于新手学习者来说,这是一项高度复杂的自我调节技能,如果没有指导,就无法独善其身。运用教育理论,我们提出了如何设计认知和元认知辅助工具来引导学习者进行反思性停顿,并研究其对模拟训练环境中表现的影响。方法:从认知负荷、主要表现、次要表现和封装四个方面考察这些影响。医学生(N=72)在2种条件下进行急诊医学模拟训练:提示和引导反思的反思条件(N=36)和没有这种反思的控制条件(N=三十六)。结果:反思性停顿对学习成绩的影响主要表现在两个方面:认知负荷下降和二次学习成绩提高。然而,主要性能和封装没有显示出显著差异。结论:研究结果表明,实施认知和元认知辅助的反思性停顿可以提高某些方面的表现。我们建议,为了确保这些效果,应该在反思和适应期内提供反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
期刊最新文献
Creation of a Novel Child Simulator and Curriculum to Optimize Administration of Seizure Rescue Medication. Increase in Newborns Ventilated Within the First Minute of Life and Reduced Mortality After Clinical Data-Guided Simulation Training. Systematic Review of Procedural Skill Simulation in Health Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Optimal Duration of High-Fidelity Simulator Training for Bronchoscope-Guided Intubation: A Noninferiority Randomized Trial. Theoretical, Conceptual, and Operational Aspects in Simulation Training With Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice: An Integrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1