Stress Testing the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Novel Use of In Situ Simulation to Identify and Mitigate Latent Safety Threats During Acute Airway Management.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-21 DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000725
Farrukh Nadeem Jafri, Rachel C Santana Felipes, Dimitrios Bliagos, Rafael E Torres, Simon Bellido, Amber Arif, Diana Elwell, Doreen Mirante, Kelly Ellsworth, John Cardasis, George Anastasian, Hazel Pinto, Ajar Kochar
{"title":"Stress Testing the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Novel Use of In Situ Simulation to Identify and Mitigate Latent Safety Threats During Acute Airway Management.","authors":"Farrukh Nadeem Jafri, Rachel C Santana Felipes, Dimitrios Bliagos, Rafael E Torres, Simon Bellido, Amber Arif, Diana Elwell, Doreen Mirante, Kelly Ellsworth, John Cardasis, George Anastasian, Hazel Pinto, Ajar Kochar","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although uncommon, cardiac arrests in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) are often catastrophic and likely to increase with rising case complexity. In situ simulation (ISS) has been used to identify latent safety threats (LSTs) in inpatient units but has not yet been studied in the CCL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles leveraging ISS were conducted focused on acute airway management. Data collected through debriefs focused on (1) airway management, (2) equipment availability, and (3) interdepartmental communication. The LSTs were subcategorized and plotted on the Survey Analysis for Evaluating Risk (SAFER)-Matrix. A SAFER score was calculated based on quantifying the likelihood of harm, scope, and the number of times a threat was identified during simulation. Time to definitive airway was collected as a secondary measure. Interventions were developed using cause and effect and driver diagrams between PDSA cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven total simulations through 3 PDSA cycles were conducted between January and December 2021 (5 in PDSA 1, 4 in PDSA 2, and 2 in PDSA 3). One hundred one LSTs were identified with 14 total subcategories. The mean SAFER score decreased from 5.37 in PDSA 1, to 2.96 in PDSA 2, and to 1.00 in PDSA 3. Bivariate regression analysis showed a decrease in SAFER score of 2.19 for every PDSA cycle ( P = 0.011). Ordinary least squares regression had a decrease of 1.65 in airway-related threats every PDSA cycle ( P < 0.01) as well as an increase in intubation time of 35.0 seconds for every 1-unit increase in communication threat identified ( P = 0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study successfully leveraged ISS and existing quality improvement initiatives in the CCL, resulting in a decrease in airway-related threats as measured through simulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000725","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although uncommon, cardiac arrests in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) are often catastrophic and likely to increase with rising case complexity. In situ simulation (ISS) has been used to identify latent safety threats (LSTs) in inpatient units but has not yet been studied in the CCL.

Methods: Three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles leveraging ISS were conducted focused on acute airway management. Data collected through debriefs focused on (1) airway management, (2) equipment availability, and (3) interdepartmental communication. The LSTs were subcategorized and plotted on the Survey Analysis for Evaluating Risk (SAFER)-Matrix. A SAFER score was calculated based on quantifying the likelihood of harm, scope, and the number of times a threat was identified during simulation. Time to definitive airway was collected as a secondary measure. Interventions were developed using cause and effect and driver diagrams between PDSA cycles.

Results: Eleven total simulations through 3 PDSA cycles were conducted between January and December 2021 (5 in PDSA 1, 4 in PDSA 2, and 2 in PDSA 3). One hundred one LSTs were identified with 14 total subcategories. The mean SAFER score decreased from 5.37 in PDSA 1, to 2.96 in PDSA 2, and to 1.00 in PDSA 3. Bivariate regression analysis showed a decrease in SAFER score of 2.19 for every PDSA cycle ( P = 0.011). Ordinary least squares regression had a decrease of 1.65 in airway-related threats every PDSA cycle ( P < 0.01) as well as an increase in intubation time of 35.0 seconds for every 1-unit increase in communication threat identified ( P = 0.037).

Conclusions: This study successfully leveraged ISS and existing quality improvement initiatives in the CCL, resulting in a decrease in airway-related threats as measured through simulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心导管实验室压力测试:在急性气道管理过程中使用现场模拟来识别和减轻潜在安全威胁的新方法。
导言:心脏导管室(CCL)中发生的心脏骤停虽然并不常见,但往往是灾难性的,而且可能随着病例复杂程度的增加而增加。原位模拟(ISS)已被用于识别住院病房中潜在的安全威胁(LST),但尚未在心导管室中进行过研究:方法:利用 ISS 开展了三个 "计划-实施-研究-行动"(PDSA)周期,重点关注急性气道管理。通过汇报收集的数据主要集中在:(1)气道管理;(2)设备可用性;(3)部门间沟通。LST 被细分并绘制在风险评估调查分析 (SAFER) 矩阵上。SAFER 分数是根据伤害的可能性、范围和模拟过程中发现威胁的次数进行量化计算的。作为次要衡量标准,还收集了确定气道所需的时间。利用 PDSA 循环之间的因果关系图和驱动图制定干预措施:2021 年 1 月至 12 月期间,通过 3 个 PDSA 周期共进行了 11 次模拟(PDSA 1 中 5 次,PDSA 2 中 4 次,PDSA 3 中 2 次)。共确定了 14 个子类别的 100 个 LST。平均 SAFER 分数从 PDSA 1 中的 5.37 分降至 PDSA 2 中的 2.96 分,再降至 PDSA 3 中的 1.00 分。双变量回归分析表明,每个 PDSA 周期的 SAFER 分数都下降了 2.19(P = 0.011)。普通最小二乘法回归显示,每一个 PDSA 周期气道相关威胁减少 1.65(P < 0.01),每增加 1 个单位的沟通威胁,插管时间增加 35.0 秒(P = 0.037):本研究成功利用了 ISS 和 CCL 现有的质量改进措施,通过模拟测量减少了气道相关威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
期刊最新文献
Creation of a Novel Child Simulator and Curriculum to Optimize Administration of Seizure Rescue Medication. Increase in Newborns Ventilated Within the First Minute of Life and Reduced Mortality After Clinical Data-Guided Simulation Training. Systematic Review of Procedural Skill Simulation in Health Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Optimal Duration of High-Fidelity Simulator Training for Bronchoscope-Guided Intubation: A Noninferiority Randomized Trial. Theoretical, Conceptual, and Operational Aspects in Simulation Training With Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice: An Integrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1