Pregabalin in the Treatment of Peripheral and Central Chronic Neuropathic Pain.

Besim Prnjavorac, Suljo Kunic, Natasa Pejanovic-Skobic, Nermina Polimac Gorana, Dragana Zirojevic, Samra Kadic Vukas, Merita Tiric Campara, Amira Skopljak
{"title":"Pregabalin in the Treatment of Peripheral and Central Chronic Neuropathic Pain.","authors":"Besim Prnjavorac,&nbsp;Suljo Kunic,&nbsp;Natasa Pejanovic-Skobic,&nbsp;Nermina Polimac Gorana,&nbsp;Dragana Zirojevic,&nbsp;Samra Kadic Vukas,&nbsp;Merita Tiric Campara,&nbsp;Amira Skopljak","doi":"10.5455/msm.2023.35.42-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregabalin is a first-line therapy of pain with additional positive effects on the states of depression and anxiety that often occur in patients with chronic pain, thus improving their quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of pregabalin in reducing neuropathic pain and improving quality of life in patients with peripheral and central chronic neuropathic pain in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Also, the aim was to monitor the safety of therapy with pregabalin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included patients with neuropathic pain lasting more than 3 months. Based on the underlying disease, patients were divided into 5 groups: DM-patients with diabetes mellitus, M-patients after stroke, D-patients with lower back pain, MS-patients with multiple sclerosis, and P group-patients with spinal cord injury. During the baseline visit, the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) was used to assess neuropathic pain. During two follow-up visits (1.5 and 3 months after baseline), the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF 36) was used to assess the effectiveness of therapy on quality of life. The safety of the treatment was evaluated by monitoring the incidence of adverse drug reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 125 patients. During treatment with pregabalin, there was a statistically significant reduction in pain intensity in the DM, M, D and MS groups. In group P, the decrease in pain intensity was not statistically significant (p = 0.070). There was a significant improvement in different parameters of the quality of life in all analyzed groups, with the most prominent effects in the DM group. The effectiveness of treatment was rated as \"good\" and \"very good\" in more than 70% of subjects in each group. The expected side effects of treatment were recorded in 27.1% of patients in the DM group, in 20.0% in the M group and in 22.2% in the MS group. Unexpected side effects of treatment were observed in one patient (2.1%) in the DM group. Assessment of tolerability of the applied treatment showed \"good\" and \"very good\" response in 68.7% of patients in DM group, 73.3% in M group, 74.5% in D group, 88.9% in MS group and 85.8% in P group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregabalin is a safe and effective drug in treatment of neuropathic pain of different etiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":18358,"journal":{"name":"Materia Socio-Medica","volume":"35 1","pages":"42-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3e/ef/MSM-35-42.PMC10122530.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materia Socio-Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2023.35.42-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Pregabalin is a first-line therapy of pain with additional positive effects on the states of depression and anxiety that often occur in patients with chronic pain, thus improving their quality of life.

Objective: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of pregabalin in reducing neuropathic pain and improving quality of life in patients with peripheral and central chronic neuropathic pain in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Also, the aim was to monitor the safety of therapy with pregabalin.

Methods: The study included patients with neuropathic pain lasting more than 3 months. Based on the underlying disease, patients were divided into 5 groups: DM-patients with diabetes mellitus, M-patients after stroke, D-patients with lower back pain, MS-patients with multiple sclerosis, and P group-patients with spinal cord injury. During the baseline visit, the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) was used to assess neuropathic pain. During two follow-up visits (1.5 and 3 months after baseline), the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF 36) was used to assess the effectiveness of therapy on quality of life. The safety of the treatment was evaluated by monitoring the incidence of adverse drug reactions.

Results: The study included 125 patients. During treatment with pregabalin, there was a statistically significant reduction in pain intensity in the DM, M, D and MS groups. In group P, the decrease in pain intensity was not statistically significant (p = 0.070). There was a significant improvement in different parameters of the quality of life in all analyzed groups, with the most prominent effects in the DM group. The effectiveness of treatment was rated as "good" and "very good" in more than 70% of subjects in each group. The expected side effects of treatment were recorded in 27.1% of patients in the DM group, in 20.0% in the M group and in 22.2% in the MS group. Unexpected side effects of treatment were observed in one patient (2.1%) in the DM group. Assessment of tolerability of the applied treatment showed "good" and "very good" response in 68.7% of patients in DM group, 73.3% in M group, 74.5% in D group, 88.9% in MS group and 85.8% in P group.

Conclusion: Pregabalin is a safe and effective drug in treatment of neuropathic pain of different etiology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普瑞巴林治疗外周和中枢慢性神经性疼痛。
背景:普瑞巴林是一种治疗疼痛的一线药物,对慢性疼痛患者经常出现的抑郁和焦虑状态有额外的积极作用,从而改善他们的生活质量。目的:本研究的目的是证明普瑞巴林在减轻周围和中枢慢性神经性疼痛患者神经性疼痛和改善生活质量方面的疗效。同时,目的是监测普瑞巴林治疗的安全性。方法:研究对象为持续3个月以上的神经性疼痛患者。根据基础疾病将患者分为糖尿病dm组、脑卒中后m组、腰痛d组、多发性硬化症ms组、脊髓损伤P组。在基线访问期间,使用利兹神经性症状和体征评估(LANSS)来评估神经性疼痛。在两次随访期间(基线后1.5个月和3个月),采用36项简短健康调查(SF 36)来评估治疗对生活质量的有效性。通过监测药物不良反应的发生率来评价治疗的安全性。结果:纳入125例患者。在普瑞巴林治疗期间,DM、M、D和MS组疼痛强度均有统计学意义的降低。P组疼痛强度降低,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.070)。各分析组患者的生活质量各参数均有显著改善,其中以DM组效果最显著。在每组中,超过70%的受试者的治疗效果被评为“良好”和“非常好”。DM组中27.1%的患者出现了预期的治疗副作用,M组为20.0%,MS组为22.2%。DM组有1例(2.1%)出现治疗意外副作用。应用耐受性评价中,DM组68.7%、M组73.3%、D组74.5%、MS组88.9%、P组85.8%的患者反应为“良好”和“非常好”。结论:普瑞巴林是一种安全有效的治疗不同病因神经性疼痛的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Compassion Fatigue and Compassion Satisfaction in Pediatric Intensive Care Professionals. The Evaluation of Intestinal Permeability in Preeclamptic Pregnancy. Acquisition of New Philips Affiniti 30 Vascular Color Doppler Ultrasound Device - Cost Benefit Analysis to Reduce Cardiosurgical Patients' Treatment. Behavioral and Knowledge Patterns Regarding the Use of Antibiotics Among Urban and Rural Population in Bosnia and Herzegovina-a Cross-sectional Study. Domestic Violence During Women's Life in Developing Countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1