Effect of a structured early mobilization protocol on the level of mobilization and muscle strength in critical care patients: A randomized clinical trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-07 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2023.2233097
Maria Aparecida Stroppa de Paula, Erich Vidal Carvalho, Rodrigo de Souza Vieira, Cristiane Bastos-Netto, Luciana Angélica da Silva de Jesus, Caio Groetaers Stohler, Gustavo Candiá Arantes, Fernando Antonio Basile Colugnati, Maycon Moura Reboredo, Bruno Valle Pinheiro
{"title":"Effect of a structured early mobilization protocol on the level of mobilization and muscle strength in critical care patients: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Maria Aparecida Stroppa de Paula, Erich Vidal Carvalho, Rodrigo de Souza Vieira, Cristiane Bastos-Netto, Luciana Angélica da Silva de Jesus, Caio Groetaers Stohler, Gustavo Candiá Arantes, Fernando Antonio Basile Colugnati, Maycon Moura Reboredo, Bruno Valle Pinheiro","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2233097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have evaluated the effects of structured early mobilization (EM) protocols on the level of mobilization in critical care patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of a structured EM protocol on the level of mobilization, muscle strength, and the level of activities of daily living (LADL) after intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial (U1111-1245-4840) included adults patients who were randomized into two groups: intervention (<i>n</i> = 40) and control (<i>n</i> = 45). The intervention group underwent conventional physiotherapy and structured EM protocols, and the control group underwent conventional physiotherapy. The level of mobilization from 0 (no mobilization) to 5 (walking), muscle strength (Medical Research Council scale), LADL (Katz Index), and incidence of complications were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The level of mobilization from day 1 to day 7 increased in the intervention group compared with the control group (<i>p</i> < .05). Muscle strength did not change during the protocol in the intervention and control groups {day 1 [effect size (<i>r</i>) = 0.15, <i>p</i> = .161], at ICU discharge [<i>r</i> = 0.16, <i>p</i> = .145], and after ICU discharge [<i>r</i> = 0.16, <i>p</i> = .191]}. The LADL did not differ between the intervention and control groups after ICU discharge [4 (1-6) vs. 3 (1-5), <i>p</i> = .702] or 30 days after hospital discharge [6 (5-6) vs. 6 (5-6), <i>p</i> = .945]. The structured EM protocol was safe, and no severe complications were observed during the protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A structured EM protocol increased the level of mobilization without improving muscle strength and the LADL compared with conventional physiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"2004-2013"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2233097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few studies have evaluated the effects of structured early mobilization (EM) protocols on the level of mobilization in critical care patients.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a structured EM protocol on the level of mobilization, muscle strength, and the level of activities of daily living (LADL) after intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial (U1111-1245-4840) included adults patients who were randomized into two groups: intervention (n = 40) and control (n = 45). The intervention group underwent conventional physiotherapy and structured EM protocols, and the control group underwent conventional physiotherapy. The level of mobilization from 0 (no mobilization) to 5 (walking), muscle strength (Medical Research Council scale), LADL (Katz Index), and incidence of complications were evaluated.

Results: The level of mobilization from day 1 to day 7 increased in the intervention group compared with the control group (p < .05). Muscle strength did not change during the protocol in the intervention and control groups {day 1 [effect size (r) = 0.15, p = .161], at ICU discharge [r = 0.16, p = .145], and after ICU discharge [r = 0.16, p = .191]}. The LADL did not differ between the intervention and control groups after ICU discharge [4 (1-6) vs. 3 (1-5), p = .702] or 30 days after hospital discharge [6 (5-6) vs. 6 (5-6), p = .945]. The structured EM protocol was safe, and no severe complications were observed during the protocol.

Conclusion: A structured EM protocol increased the level of mobilization without improving muscle strength and the LADL compared with conventional physiotherapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结构化早期动员方案对危重症患者动员水平和肌肉力量的影响:随机临床试验。
背景:很少有研究评估结构化早期动员(EM)方案对重症监护患者动员水平的影响:评估结构化早期动员方案对重症监护病房(ICU)和出院后动员水平、肌肉力量和日常生活活动水平(LADL)的影响:这项随机临床试验(U1111-1245-4840)将成人患者随机分为两组:干预组(40 人)和对照组(45 人)。干预组接受常规物理治疗和结构化电磁方案,对照组接受常规物理治疗。结果显示,干预组从第1天开始的活动度从0(无活动度)到5(行走)、肌肉力量(医学研究委员会量表)、LADL(卡茨指数)以及并发症的发生率均有所提高:结果:与对照组相比,干预组患者从第1天到第7天的活动能力均有所提高(p r) = 0.15,p = .161],ICU出院时[r = 0.16,p = .145],ICU出院后[r = 0.16,p = .191]}。干预组和对照组的 LADL 在 ICU 出院后 [4 (1-6) vs. 3 (1-5),p = .702] 或出院 30 天后 [6 (5-6) vs. 6 (5-6),p = .945] 没有差异。结构化急救方案是安全的,方案实施期间未发现严重并发症:结论:与传统物理疗法相比,结构化急救方案提高了患者的活动能力,但没有改善患者的肌力和LADL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of pain activity patterns, disability, body awareness, proprioception and function in individuals with and without lumbar spinal decompression surgery. Variation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis presentation and outcomes based on phenotype and physical therapy movement system diagnosis: a case series. The prevalence, characteristics, and associated factors of pain in individuals with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Association between varus thrust and foot alignment and flexibility in knee osteoarthritis. Fear of movement interacts with trunk mobility, and pain intensity to predict disability in patients with chronic low back pain: a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1