Variation of eGFR reporting and CKD equations used in the United Kingdom.

Abstract

Background: UK Clinical laboratories have been routinely reporting an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on creatinine measurements using an eGFR equation since the early 2000s. Though there have been recommendations to use enzymatic based creatinine assays, and a recommendation of which equation to use, there still remains a high degree of variation in calculated eGFR results.

Methods: Data from the UK NEQAS for Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease Scheme have been reviewed to look at the CKD equations that are currently in use in the UK and the impact on eGFR results reported. The UK NEQAS for Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease has over 400 participants measuring creatinine across all major clinical biochemistry platforms.

Results: An audit of EQA registration against results returned showed that in February 2022 at most 44% of registered participants were correctly reporting the 2009 CKD-EPI equation. At higher creatinine concentrations (which give rise to lower eGFR results), the spread of eGFRs is tight and there is little difference between results from different method principles. However, at lower creatinine concentrations, where it is known that there is more variation in creatinine depending on method choice, both method principle and eGFR equation choice can influence calculated eGFR. In some cases, this can impact CKD Stage classification.

Conclusions: CKD is a serious public health issue that requires accurate assessment of eGFR. Laboratories should be in constant dialogue with their renal teams about their creatinine assay performance and impact on eGFR reporting across their service.