Validation study of the Chinese version of the Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised for individuals with spinal cord injury in Mainland China.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-10 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2023.2217589
Hai-Xia Xie, Qi Zhang, Yan Wei, Nan Li, Ai-Rong Wu, Xu-Heng Zeng, Hui-Fang Wang, Jun-An Zhou, Feng Shen, Feng-Shui Chang
{"title":"Validation study of the Chinese version of the Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised for individuals with spinal cord injury in Mainland China.","authors":"Hai-Xia Xie, Qi Zhang, Yan Wei, Nan Li, Ai-Rong Wu, Xu-Heng Zeng, Hui-Fang Wang, Jun-An Zhou, Feng Shen, Feng-Shui Chang","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2217589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To validate the Chinese version of the Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised (CIQ-R-C) for individuals with spinal cord injury.<b>Design:</b> Cross-sectional study.<b>Setting:</b> Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center.<b>Participants:</b> 317 adults with spinal cord injury in a rehabilitation center in Mainland China.<b>Interventions:</b> Not applicable.<b>Methods:</b> The CIQ-R-C (including an additional e-shopping item), global QoL, Zung Self-Rating Anxiety/Depression Scale (SAS/SDS), and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) were administered. Reliability and validity analyses were conducted.<b>Results:</b> Good item-domain correlations were found for 15 of the 16-item original CIQ-R, except for item 10 (leisure alone or with others). Exploratory Factor Analysis supported a construct of the CIQ-R-C (excluding item 10) as made of four domains (CFI = 0.94; RMSEA = 0.06): home, social engagement, digital social networking, and traditional social networking. Good internal consistency and test-retest reliability were observed in the total and the home subscale of the CIQ-R-C. Satisfactory construct validity was shown by the correlation analysis among the CIQ-R-C Scale, SAS/SDS, global QoL, and MSPSS.<b>Conclusion:</b> The CIQ-R-C Scale is valid and reliable, and can be used to assess community integration of individuals with spinal cord injury in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"850-858"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2217589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To validate the Chinese version of the Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised (CIQ-R-C) for individuals with spinal cord injury.Design: Cross-sectional study.Setting: Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center.Participants: 317 adults with spinal cord injury in a rehabilitation center in Mainland China.Interventions: Not applicable.Methods: The CIQ-R-C (including an additional e-shopping item), global QoL, Zung Self-Rating Anxiety/Depression Scale (SAS/SDS), and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) were administered. Reliability and validity analyses were conducted.Results: Good item-domain correlations were found for 15 of the 16-item original CIQ-R, except for item 10 (leisure alone or with others). Exploratory Factor Analysis supported a construct of the CIQ-R-C (excluding item 10) as made of four domains (CFI = 0.94; RMSEA = 0.06): home, social engagement, digital social networking, and traditional social networking. Good internal consistency and test-retest reliability were observed in the total and the home subscale of the CIQ-R-C. Satisfactory construct validity was shown by the correlation analysis among the CIQ-R-C Scale, SAS/SDS, global QoL, and MSPSS.Conclusion: The CIQ-R-C Scale is valid and reliable, and can be used to assess community integration of individuals with spinal cord injury in China.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对中国大陆脊髓损伤患者的社区融合问卷-修订版中文版验证研究。
目的验证中文版脊髓损伤患者社区融入问卷-修订版(CIQ-R-C):设计:横断面研究:上海阳光康复中心:干预措施:不适用:不适用:采用CIQ-R-C(包括额外的电子购物项目)、总体QoL、Zung焦虑/抑郁自评量表(SAS/SDS)和感知社会支持多维量表(MSPSS)。进行了信度和效度分析:在最初的 16 个项目 CIQ-R 中,除第 10 个项目(独自或与他人休闲)外,其余 15 个项目均具有良好的项目-领域相关性。探索性因子分析(Exploratory Factor Analysis)支持CIQ-R-C(不包括第10项)由四个领域构成(CFI=0.94;RMSEA=0.06):家庭、社会参与、数字社交网络和传统社交网络。CIQ-R-C的总分量表和家庭分量表具有良好的内部一致性和重测可靠性。CIQ-R-C量表、SAS/SDS、总体QoL和MSPSS之间的相关性分析表明,CIQ-R-C量表的建构效度令人满意:CIQ-R-C量表有效且可靠,可用于评估中国脊髓损伤患者的社区融合情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
期刊最新文献
Adaptation of the German language version of the QUAlity of life assessment of spina bifida for adults (QUALAS-A-G). Gait recovery in patients with late assessment of incomplete spinal cord injury: A retrospective study in Argentina. Heavy moxibustion at Sanyin point ameliorates neurogenic bladder dysfunction in spinal cord injury rats through the PI3 K/mTOR pathway. Osteoporosis and osteopenia in young adults with spinal cord injury: The necessity of an early bone mineral density checkup. Evolution of the Veterans Health Administration Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders (SCI/D) Registry (VHA SCIDR): Characterization from 1994 to 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1