Percutaneous tracheostomy: Comparison of three different methods with respect to tracheal cartilage injury in cadavers-Randomized controlled study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pathology & Oncology Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/pore.2023.1610934
Fruzsina Bódis, Gábor Orosz, József T Tóth, Marcell Szabó, László Gergely Élő, János Gál, Gábor Élő
{"title":"Percutaneous tracheostomy: Comparison of three different methods with respect to tracheal cartilage injury in cadavers-Randomized controlled study.","authors":"Fruzsina Bódis,&nbsp;Gábor Orosz,&nbsp;József T Tóth,&nbsp;Marcell Szabó,&nbsp;László Gergely Élő,&nbsp;János Gál,&nbsp;Gábor Élő","doi":"10.3389/pore.2023.1610934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Performing tracheostomy improves patient comfort and success rate of weaning from prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation. Data suggest that patients have more benefit of percutaneous technique than the surgical procedure, however, there is no consensus on the percutaneous method of choice regarding severe complications such as late tracheal stenosis. Aim of this study was comparing incidences of cartilage injury caused by different percutaneous dilatation techniques (PDT), including Single Dilator, Griggs' and modified (bidirectional) Griggs' method. <b>Materials and methods:</b> Randomized observational study was conducted on 150 cadavers underwent post-mortem percutaneous tracheostomy. Data of cadavers including age, gender and time elapsed from death until the intervention (more or less than 72 h) were collected and recorded. Primary and secondary outcomes were: rate of cartilage injury and cannula malposition respectively. <b>Results:</b> Statistical analysis revealed that method of intervention was significantly associated with occurrence of cartilage injury, as comparing either standard Griggs' with Single Dilator (<i>p</i> = 0.002; OR: 4.903; 95% CI: 1.834-13.105) or modified Griggs' with Single Dilator (<i>p</i> < 0.001; OR: 6.559; 95% CI: 2.472-17.404), however, no statistical difference was observed between standard and modified Griggs' techniques (<i>p</i> = 0.583; OR: 0.748; 95% CI: 0.347-1.610). We found no statistical difference in the occurrence of cartilage injury between the early- and late post-mortem group (<i>p</i> = 0.630). Neither gender (<i>p</i> = 0.913), nor age (<i>p</i> = 0.529) influenced the rate of cartilage fracture. There was no statistical difference between the applied PDT techniques regarding the cannula misplacement/malposition. <b>Conclusion:</b> In this cadaver study both standard and modified Griggs' forceps dilatational methods were safer than Single dilator in respect of cartilage injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":19981,"journal":{"name":"Pathology & Oncology Research","volume":"29 ","pages":"1610934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10135429/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology & Oncology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2023.1610934","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Performing tracheostomy improves patient comfort and success rate of weaning from prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation. Data suggest that patients have more benefit of percutaneous technique than the surgical procedure, however, there is no consensus on the percutaneous method of choice regarding severe complications such as late tracheal stenosis. Aim of this study was comparing incidences of cartilage injury caused by different percutaneous dilatation techniques (PDT), including Single Dilator, Griggs' and modified (bidirectional) Griggs' method. Materials and methods: Randomized observational study was conducted on 150 cadavers underwent post-mortem percutaneous tracheostomy. Data of cadavers including age, gender and time elapsed from death until the intervention (more or less than 72 h) were collected and recorded. Primary and secondary outcomes were: rate of cartilage injury and cannula malposition respectively. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that method of intervention was significantly associated with occurrence of cartilage injury, as comparing either standard Griggs' with Single Dilator (p = 0.002; OR: 4.903; 95% CI: 1.834-13.105) or modified Griggs' with Single Dilator (p < 0.001; OR: 6.559; 95% CI: 2.472-17.404), however, no statistical difference was observed between standard and modified Griggs' techniques (p = 0.583; OR: 0.748; 95% CI: 0.347-1.610). We found no statistical difference in the occurrence of cartilage injury between the early- and late post-mortem group (p = 0.630). Neither gender (p = 0.913), nor age (p = 0.529) influenced the rate of cartilage fracture. There was no statistical difference between the applied PDT techniques regarding the cannula misplacement/malposition. Conclusion: In this cadaver study both standard and modified Griggs' forceps dilatational methods were safer than Single dilator in respect of cartilage injury.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮气管造口术:三种不同方法治疗尸体气管软骨损伤的比较——随机对照研究。
背景:气管切开术可提高患者的舒适度和长时间有创机械通气的脱机成功率。数据显示,经皮穿刺技术比外科手术更有利于患者,然而,对于晚期气管狭窄等严重并发症,经皮穿刺方法的选择尚无共识。本研究的目的是比较不同经皮扩张术(PDT)对软骨损伤的发生率,包括单扩张术、Griggs法和改良(双向)Griggs法。材料与方法:对150例经皮气管切开术的尸体进行随机观察研究。收集和记录尸体的数据,包括年龄、性别和从死亡到干预(超过或少于72小时)所经过的时间。主要和次要结局分别是:软骨损伤率和套管错位率。结果:统计学分析显示,干预方法与软骨损伤的发生有显著的相关性,无论是标准Griggs'还是单张扩张器(p = 0.002;OR: 4.903;95% CI: 1.834-13.105)或单扩张器改良Griggs (p < 0.001;OR: 6.559;95% CI: 2.472-17.404),然而,在标准和改进的Griggs技术之间没有观察到统计学差异(p = 0.583;OR: 0.748;95% ci: 0.347-1.610)。我们发现早死组和晚死组软骨损伤发生率无统计学差异(p = 0.630)。性别(p = 0.913)和年龄(p = 0.529)对软骨骨折发生率均无影响。应用PDT技术在套管错位/错位方面无统计学差异。结论:在本研究中,对于软骨损伤,标准和改良的Griggs钳扩张方法均比单一扩张器更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pathology & Oncology Research (POR) is an interdisciplinary Journal at the interface of pathology and oncology including the preclinical and translational research, diagnostics and therapy. Furthermore, POR is an international forum for the rapid communication of reviews, original research, critical and topical reports with excellence and novelty. Published quarterly, POR is dedicated to keeping scientists informed of developments on the selected biomedical fields bridging the gap between basic research and clinical medicine. It is a special aim for POR to promote pathological and oncological publishing activity of colleagues in the Central and East European region. The journal will be of interest to pathologists, and a broad range of experimental and clinical oncologists, and related experts. POR is supported by an acknowledged international advisory board and the Arányi Fundation for modern pathology.
期刊最新文献
Impact of limb ischemic preconditioning on the incidence of vein thrombosis in patients with peripherally inserted central catheter. Retraction: The Plasmodium circumsporozoite protein, a novel NF-κB inhibitor, suppresses the growth of SW480. Case report: A rare case of oral sebaceous carcinoma in the upper lip. Artificial intelligence-based automated determination in breast and colon cancer and distinction between atypical and typical mitosis using a cloud-based platform. Diagnostic challenges in complicated case of glioblastoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1