Framing stigma as an avoidable social harm that widens inequality.

IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Review Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-20 DOI:10.1177/00380261221150080
Michelle Addison
{"title":"Framing stigma as an avoidable social harm that widens inequality.","authors":"Michelle Addison","doi":"10.1177/00380261221150080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article discusses the social harms arising out of stigma experienced by people who use drugs (PWUD), and how stigmatisation compromises 'human flourishing' and constrains 'life choices'. Drawing on Wellcome Trust qualitative research using in-depth, semi-structured interview data (<i>N</i> = 24) with people who use heroin, crack cocaine, spice and amphetamine, this article firstly provides insight into how stigma is operationalised relationally between people via a lens of class talk and drug use predicated on normative ideas of 'valued personhood'. Secondly, it turns to how stigma is weaponised in social relations to keep people 'down', and thirdly, it shows how stigma is internalised as blame and shame and felt deeply 'under the skin' as 'ugly feelings'. Findings from the study show that stigma harms mental health, inhibits access to services, increases feelings of isolation, and corrodes a person's sense of self-worth as a valued human being. These relentless negotiations of stigma are painful, exhausting and damaging for PWUD, culminating in, as I argue, everyday acts of social harm that come to be normalised.</p>","PeriodicalId":48250,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221150080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses the social harms arising out of stigma experienced by people who use drugs (PWUD), and how stigmatisation compromises 'human flourishing' and constrains 'life choices'. Drawing on Wellcome Trust qualitative research using in-depth, semi-structured interview data (N = 24) with people who use heroin, crack cocaine, spice and amphetamine, this article firstly provides insight into how stigma is operationalised relationally between people via a lens of class talk and drug use predicated on normative ideas of 'valued personhood'. Secondly, it turns to how stigma is weaponised in social relations to keep people 'down', and thirdly, it shows how stigma is internalised as blame and shame and felt deeply 'under the skin' as 'ugly feelings'. Findings from the study show that stigma harms mental health, inhibits access to services, increases feelings of isolation, and corrodes a person's sense of self-worth as a valued human being. These relentless negotiations of stigma are painful, exhausting and damaging for PWUD, culminating in, as I argue, everyday acts of social harm that come to be normalised.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将成见定格为一种可避免的社会伤害,它扩大了不平等。
本文讨论了吸毒者(PWUD)所经历的污名化带来的社会危害,以及污名化如何损害 "人类繁荣 "并限制 "生活选择"。本文利用威康信托基金会的定性研究,对海洛因、快克可卡因、香料和苯丙胺的吸食者进行了深入的半结构式访谈(24 人),首先深入探讨了污名化是如何通过阶级对话的视角在人与人之间以 "有价值的人格 "的规范理念为前提进行操作的。其次,文章探讨了成见如何在社会关系中被武器化,以保持人们的 "低调";第三,文章展示了成见如何被内化为责备和羞耻,并作为 "丑陋的感觉 "深入 "内心"。研究结果表明,成见会损害心理健康,阻碍人们获得服务,增加孤独感,侵蚀一个人作为有价值的人的自我价值感。对残疾人来说,这些无休止的成见谈判是痛苦的、令人精疲力竭的和有害的,正如我所认为的那样,最终导致日常的社会伤害行为被正常化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Review
Sociological Review SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The Sociological Review has been publishing high quality and innovative articles for over 100 years. During this time we have steadfastly remained a general sociological journal, selecting papers of immediate and lasting significance. Covering all branches of the discipline, including criminology, education, gender, medicine, and organization, our tradition extends to research that is anthropological or philosophical in orientation and analytical or ethnographic in approach. We focus on questions that shape the nature and scope of sociology as well as those that address the changing forms and impact of social relations. In saying this we are not soliciting papers that seek to prescribe methods or dictate perspectives for the discipline. In opening up frontiers and publishing leading-edge research, we see these heterodox issues being settled and unsettled over time by virtue of contributors keeping the debates that occupy sociologists vital and relevant.
期刊最新文献
Who counts in poverty research? Suicide as slow death: towards a haunted sociology of suicide. Varieties of alternativeness: Relational practices in collaborative housing in Vienna Grieving academic grant rejections: Examining funding failure and experiences of loss Movement meaning of money: Monetary mobilization in Hong Kong’s prodemocracy movement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1