Kusankha Pamodzi: Health Care Decision-Making Preferences Among Patients with Cancer in Malawi.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2023.0002
Alyssa E Tilly, April Evans, Jane S Chen, Agness Manda, Ande Salima, Samuel Bingo, Maria Chikasema, Katherine D Westmoreland
{"title":"Kusankha Pamodzi: Health Care Decision-Making Preferences Among Patients with Cancer in Malawi.","authors":"Alyssa E Tilly,&nbsp;April Evans,&nbsp;Jane S Chen,&nbsp;Agness Manda,&nbsp;Ande Salima,&nbsp;Samuel Bingo,&nbsp;Maria Chikasema,&nbsp;Katherine D Westmoreland","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2023.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oncology teams are encouraged to include patient preferences and goals of care in determining appropriate treatment courses. There are no existing data from Malawi exploring decision-making preferences among cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the oncology clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi, 50 patients were surveyed for decision making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (70%, <i>n</i> = 35) preferred to engage in shared decision making regarding cancer treatment. About half (52%, <i>n</i> = 24) did not feel that their medical team involved them in decision making and 64% (<i>n</i> = 32) felt that they were never or only sometimes listened to by the medical team. Nearly all (94%, <i>n</i> = 47) preferred to have their medical team inform them how likely treatments are to lead to cure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shared decision making was the preferred mode of treatment decision making by the majority of the surveyed cancer patients in Malawi. Cancer patients in Malawi may have similar preferences to cancer patients in other low-resource settings regarding decision making and communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2023.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oncology teams are encouraged to include patient preferences and goals of care in determining appropriate treatment courses. There are no existing data from Malawi exploring decision-making preferences among cancer patients.

Methods: In the oncology clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi, 50 patients were surveyed for decision making.

Results: Most participants (70%, n = 35) preferred to engage in shared decision making regarding cancer treatment. About half (52%, n = 24) did not feel that their medical team involved them in decision making and 64% (n = 32) felt that they were never or only sometimes listened to by the medical team. Nearly all (94%, n = 47) preferred to have their medical team inform them how likely treatments are to lead to cure.

Conclusions: Shared decision making was the preferred mode of treatment decision making by the majority of the surveyed cancer patients in Malawi. Cancer patients in Malawi may have similar preferences to cancer patients in other low-resource settings regarding decision making and communication.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kusankha Pamodzi:马拉维癌症患者的医疗决策偏好。
背景:在确定适当的治疗方案时,鼓励肿瘤团队考虑患者的偏好和护理目标。目前还没有来自马拉维的关于癌症患者决策偏好的数据。方法:在马拉维利隆圭的肿瘤诊所,对50例患者进行调查,以便做出决策。结果:大多数参与者(70%,n = 35)倾向于参与癌症治疗的共同决策。大约一半(52%,n = 24)的人认为他们的医疗团队没有让他们参与决策,64% (n = 32)的人认为他们从未或只是有时被医疗团队倾听。几乎所有人(94%,n = 47)更喜欢让他们的医疗团队告诉他们治疗导致治愈的可能性。结论:共同决策是马拉维大多数接受调查的癌症患者首选的治疗决策模式。马拉维的癌症患者在决策和沟通方面可能与其他低资源环境中的癌症患者有相似的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Characteristics, Outcomes and Factors for Place of Death in Patients Admitted to Community-Based Palliative Care Services in Shanghai China: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Nursing Practices for Dyspnea Management in Patients with Cancer Based on Monthly and Weekly Prognoses: A Multi-Site Cross-Sectional Study of Palliative Care Nurses in Japan. Is a Combination of Six Clinical Tests Useful as a Measure to Predict Short-Term Prognosis in Terminal Cancer Patients? A Prospective Observational Study in a Japanese Palliative Care Unit. The Surprise Question: Not Ready for Prime Time. Use of Nursing Support Among Nurses for Caregiver Burden in Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer in Palliative Care Units in Japan: Multisite Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1