Conjunctival microbiome changes in soft contact lens users and contact lens discomfort patients.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biomarkers Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-11 DOI:10.1080/1354750X.2023.2229532
Kang Xiao, Hang Song, Zhengyu Chen, Qin Long
{"title":"Conjunctival microbiome changes in soft contact lens users and contact lens discomfort patients.","authors":"Kang Xiao,&nbsp;Hang Song,&nbsp;Zhengyu Chen,&nbsp;Qin Long","doi":"10.1080/1354750X.2023.2229532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Contact lens discomfort (CLD) acts as a challenging problem, and the associated conjunctival microbiome changes were unclear.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Conjunctival sac swab samples were collected from 12 eyes of nonwearers (NW), 12 eyes of asymptomatic contact lens (ACL) wearers, and 11 eyes of CLD. The V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to investigate differences among three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences in alpha diversity were observed among the three groups. The beta diversity showed a distinct microbiome composition between ACL and CLD group (<i>P</i> = 0.018) with principal coordinate analysis. The relative abundance of <i>Firmicutes</i> was significantly higher in CLD (48.18%) than in ACL (13.21%) group (<i>P</i> = 0.018). The abundance of <i>Bacillus</i> in patients with ACL (0.05%) or with CLD (0.02%) were significantly lower than that in the NW (1.27%) group (<i>P</i> = 0.024, 0.028, respectively). Moreover, the abundance of <i>Firmicutes</i> was positively correlated with the OSDI scores in CLD patients (r = 0.817, <i>P</i> < 0. 01, Spearman).</p><p><strong>Discussions: </strong>Patients with CLD have various degrees of bacterial microbiota imbalance in the conjunctival sac, compared with NW and ACL groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><i>Firmicutes</i> may serve as a potential biomarker for the CLD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8921,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers","volume":" ","pages":"531-537"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1354750X.2023.2229532","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Contact lens discomfort (CLD) acts as a challenging problem, and the associated conjunctival microbiome changes were unclear.

Material and methods: Conjunctival sac swab samples were collected from 12 eyes of nonwearers (NW), 12 eyes of asymptomatic contact lens (ACL) wearers, and 11 eyes of CLD. The V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to investigate differences among three groups.

Results: No differences in alpha diversity were observed among the three groups. The beta diversity showed a distinct microbiome composition between ACL and CLD group (P = 0.018) with principal coordinate analysis. The relative abundance of Firmicutes was significantly higher in CLD (48.18%) than in ACL (13.21%) group (P = 0.018). The abundance of Bacillus in patients with ACL (0.05%) or with CLD (0.02%) were significantly lower than that in the NW (1.27%) group (P = 0.024, 0.028, respectively). Moreover, the abundance of Firmicutes was positively correlated with the OSDI scores in CLD patients (r = 0.817, P < 0. 01, Spearman).

Discussions: Patients with CLD have various degrees of bacterial microbiota imbalance in the conjunctival sac, compared with NW and ACL groups.

Conclusion: Firmicutes may serve as a potential biomarker for the CLD patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软性隐形眼镜使用者和隐形眼镜不适患者的结膜微生物组变化。
引言:隐形眼镜不适(CLD)是一个具有挑战性的问题,相关的结膜微生物组变化尚不清楚。材料和方法:收集12例未佩戴者(NW)、12例无症状接触镜(ACL)佩戴者和11例CLD患者的结膜囊拭子样本。16S rRNA基因测序的V3-V4区域用于研究三组之间的差异。结果:三组间α多样性无差异。ACL组和CLD组之间的β多样性显示出不同的微生物组组成(P = 0.018)进行主坐标分析。厚壁菌门的相对丰度CLD组(48.18%)显著高于ACL组(13.21%)(P = ACL组(0.05%)和CLD组(0.02%)的芽孢杆菌丰度显著低于NW组(1.27%)(P = 分别为0.024、0.028)。此外,厚壁菌门的丰度与CLD患者的OSDI评分呈正相关(r = 0.817,P 讨论:与NW组和ACL组相比,CLD患者结膜囊中存在不同程度的细菌微生物群失衡。结论:厚壁菌门可作为CLD患者的潜在生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomarkers
Biomarkers 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
140
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Biomarkers brings together all aspects of the rapidly growing field of biomarker research, encompassing their various uses and applications in one essential source. Biomarkers provides a vital forum for the exchange of ideas and concepts in all areas of biomarker research. High quality papers in four main areas are accepted and manuscripts describing novel biomarkers and their subsequent validation are especially encouraged: • Biomarkers of disease • Biomarkers of exposure • Biomarkers of response • Biomarkers of susceptibility Manuscripts can describe biomarkers measured in humans or other animals in vivo or in vitro. Biomarkers will consider publishing negative data from studies of biomarkers of susceptibility in human populations.
期刊最新文献
Expression and clinical significance of miR-421 in prostate cancer. Mutational and co-mutational landscape of early onset colorectal cancer. The prognostic value of neurohormonal and inflammatory biomarkers in addition to the TIMI risk score in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Changes in Exposure to Tobacco-Related Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents among Adults who Switched Completely from Smoking Cigarettes to Use of the JUUL2 System for Six Days. Upregulation of LncRNAs G2E3-AS1 and BACE1-AS as Prognostic Biomarkers in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1