A retrospective chart review of the patient population accessing augmentative & alternative communication at an urban assistive technology center.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2024-03-03 Epub Date: 2023-07-12 DOI:10.1080/10400435.2023.2224410
Allison Bean, Julia Zezinka, Carmen DiGiovine, Amy Miller Sonntag, Megan Case
{"title":"A retrospective chart review of the patient population accessing augmentative & alternative communication at an urban assistive technology center.","authors":"Allison Bean, Julia Zezinka, Carmen DiGiovine, Amy Miller Sonntag, Megan Case","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2023.2224410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to 1) identify and describe the population seeking alternative and augmentative communication (AAC) evaluations at an assistive technology (AT) center in the Midwestern United States and 2) describe the AAC device features or services participants identify as most important at their initial AAC evaluations. Charts of 53 participants seeking AAC interventions at an AT center in the Midwestern United States were retrospectively reviewed. Information from the QUEST 2.0 was used to determine what AT features were identified as most important. The majority of participants seen at the AT center had progressive diseases. Across all of the participants, ease of use and effectiveness were identified as the \"most important\" aspects of an AAC device satisfaction. These findings highlight the importance of determining who is accessing AAC services across AT centers to determine whether barriers to AAC services exist. Moreover, patients report regarding what variables they deem as most important reflect the fact that excellent service-delivery may not overcome the importance of other variables, such as ease of use that impact AAC use.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2023.2224410","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to 1) identify and describe the population seeking alternative and augmentative communication (AAC) evaluations at an assistive technology (AT) center in the Midwestern United States and 2) describe the AAC device features or services participants identify as most important at their initial AAC evaluations. Charts of 53 participants seeking AAC interventions at an AT center in the Midwestern United States were retrospectively reviewed. Information from the QUEST 2.0 was used to determine what AT features were identified as most important. The majority of participants seen at the AT center had progressive diseases. Across all of the participants, ease of use and effectiveness were identified as the "most important" aspects of an AAC device satisfaction. These findings highlight the importance of determining who is accessing AAC services across AT centers to determine whether barriers to AAC services exist. Moreover, patients report regarding what variables they deem as most important reflect the fact that excellent service-delivery may not overcome the importance of other variables, such as ease of use that impact AAC use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对一家城市辅助技术中心使用辅助和替代性交流技术的病人进行回顾性病历审查。
本研究的目的是:1)确定并描述在美国中西部一家辅助技术(AT)中心寻求替代性和辅助性交流(AAC)评估的人群;2)描述参与者在最初的 AAC 评估中认为最重要的 AAC 设备功能或服务。我们回顾性地查看了在美国中西部一家辅助技术中心寻求辅助交流技术干预的 53 名参与者的病历。QUEST 2.0 的信息被用来确定哪些辅助器具功能被认为是最重要的。在辅助器具中心就诊的大多数患者都患有进行性疾病。在所有参与者中,易用性和有效性被认为是辅助器具满意度的 "最重要 "方面。这些发现凸显了确定各辅助器具使用中心的辅助器具使用服务对象以确定是否存在辅助器具使用服务障碍的重要性。此外,患者关于他们认为最重要的变量的报告反映了一个事实,即出色的服务提供可能无法克服其他变量的重要性,例如影响自动辅助器具使用的易用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assistive Technology
Assistive Technology REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Assistive Technology is an applied, scientific publication in the multi-disciplinary field of technology for people with disabilities. The journal"s purpose is to foster communication among individuals working in all aspects of the assistive technology arena including researchers, developers, clinicians, educators and consumers. The journal will consider papers from all assistive technology applications. Only original papers will be accepted. Technical notes describing preliminary techniques, procedures, or findings of original scientific research may also be submitted. Letters to the Editor are welcome. Books for review may be sent to authors or publisher.
期刊最新文献
Addressing visual impairments: Essential software requirements for image caption solutions. Development and preliminary evaluation of a grid design application for adults and children using scanning and bci-based augmentative and alternative communication. Technology-assisted instruction with teacher prompts on fraction multiplication word problems: A single-case design with visual analysis and Bayesian multilevel modeling. Program evaluation and healthcare process improvement focused on complex wheelchair procurement. RESNA and CTF position on the application of supported standing devices: Current state of the literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1