Professional Identity Formation in Medical Education: Some Virtue-Based Insights.

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Teaching and Learning in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1080/10401334.2023.2209067
Daniel T Kim, Megan K Applewhite, Wayne Shelton
{"title":"Professional Identity Formation in Medical Education: Some Virtue-Based Insights.","authors":"Daniel T Kim, Megan K Applewhite, Wayne Shelton","doi":"10.1080/10401334.2023.2209067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Issue</i></b>: In 2010, the Carnegie Foundation published a call to reorient medical education in terms of the formation of identities rather than mere competencies, and the medical education literature on professional identity formation (PIF) has since grown rapidly. As medical learners navigate a hectic clinical learning environment fraught with challenges to professionalism and ethics, they must simultaneously orient their skills, behaviors, and evolving sense of professional identity. The medical education literature on PIF describes the psychosocial dimensions of that identity formation well. However, in its conceptual formulations, the literature risks underappreciating the pedagogical significance of the moral basis of identity formation-that is, the developing moral agencies and aspirations of learners to be good physicians. <b><i>Evidence</i></b>: Our conceptual analysis and argument build on a critical review of the medical education literature on PIF and draw on relevant insights from virtue ethics to deepen the conceptualization of PIF in moral, and not just psychosocial, terms. We show that a narrowly psychosocial view risks perpetuating institutional perceptions that can conceive professionalism norms primarily as standards of discipline or social control. By drawing on the conceptual resources of virtue ethics, we highlight not just the psychosocial development of medical learners but also their self-reflective, critical development as particular moral agents aspiring to embody the excellences of a good physician and, ultimately, to exhibit those traits and behaviors in the practice of medicine. <b><i>Implications</i></b>: We consider the pedagogical relevance of this insight. We show that drawing on virtue theory can more adequately orient medical pedagogy to socialize learners into the medical community in ways that nurture their personal growth as moral agents-in terms of their particular, restless aspirations to be a good physician and to flourish as such.</p>","PeriodicalId":51183,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"399-409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2023.2209067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issue: In 2010, the Carnegie Foundation published a call to reorient medical education in terms of the formation of identities rather than mere competencies, and the medical education literature on professional identity formation (PIF) has since grown rapidly. As medical learners navigate a hectic clinical learning environment fraught with challenges to professionalism and ethics, they must simultaneously orient their skills, behaviors, and evolving sense of professional identity. The medical education literature on PIF describes the psychosocial dimensions of that identity formation well. However, in its conceptual formulations, the literature risks underappreciating the pedagogical significance of the moral basis of identity formation-that is, the developing moral agencies and aspirations of learners to be good physicians. Evidence: Our conceptual analysis and argument build on a critical review of the medical education literature on PIF and draw on relevant insights from virtue ethics to deepen the conceptualization of PIF in moral, and not just psychosocial, terms. We show that a narrowly psychosocial view risks perpetuating institutional perceptions that can conceive professionalism norms primarily as standards of discipline or social control. By drawing on the conceptual resources of virtue ethics, we highlight not just the psychosocial development of medical learners but also their self-reflective, critical development as particular moral agents aspiring to embody the excellences of a good physician and, ultimately, to exhibit those traits and behaviors in the practice of medicine. Implications: We consider the pedagogical relevance of this insight. We show that drawing on virtue theory can more adequately orient medical pedagogy to socialize learners into the medical community in ways that nurture their personal growth as moral agents-in terms of their particular, restless aspirations to be a good physician and to flourish as such.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学教育中专业身份的形成:基于美德的一些见解。
问题:2010 年,卡内基基金会(Carnegie Foundation)呼吁从身份形成而非单纯能力的角度重新定位医学教育,自此,有关专业身份形成(PIF)的医学教育文献迅速增加。当医学学习者在紧张的临床学习环境中穿梭时,职业精神和职业道德充满了挑战,他们必须同时定位自己的技能、行为和不断发展的职业认同感。关于 PIF 的医学教育文献很好地描述了这种认同感形成的社会心理层面。然而,在其概念表述中,这些文献有可能低估了身份形成的道德基础的教学意义,即学习者发展成为好医生的道德机构和愿望。证据:我们的概念分析和论证建立在对有关 PIF 的医学教育文献的批判性回顾之上,并借鉴了美德伦理学的相关见解,从道德而不仅仅是社会心理的角度深化了 PIF 的概念化。我们表明,狭隘的社会心理观点有可能使机构观念永久化,将职业规范主要视为纪律或社会控制的标准。通过借鉴美德伦理学的概念资源,我们不仅强调了医学学习者的社会心理发展,还强调了他们作为特殊道德主体的自我反思和批判性发展,他们渴望体现优秀医生的卓越品质,并最终在行医过程中展现这些特质和行为。影响:我们考虑了这一见解的教学意义。我们表明,借鉴美德理论可以更充分地指导医学教学,以培养学习者作为道德主体的个人成长的方式使他们融入医学界,成为一名优秀的医生,并作为优秀的医生茁壮成长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Teaching and Learning in Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Medicine ( TLM) is an international, forum for scholarship on teaching and learning in the health professions. Its international scope reflects the common challenge faced by all medical educators: fostering the development of capable, well-rounded, and continuous learners prepared to practice in a complex, high-stakes, and ever-changing clinical environment. TLM''s contributors and readership comprise behavioral scientists and health care practitioners, signaling the value of integrating diverse perspectives into a comprehensive understanding of learning and performance. The journal seeks to provide the theoretical foundations and practical analysis needed for effective educational decision making in such areas as admissions, instructional design and delivery, performance assessment, remediation, technology-assisted instruction, diversity management, and faculty development, among others. TLM''s scope includes all levels of medical education, from premedical to postgraduate and continuing medical education, with articles published in the following categories:
期刊最新文献
Dismantling Ableism in Undergraduate Medical Education: Promising Practices in Disability-Conscious Training. Exploring Untested Feasibilities: Critical Pedagogy's Approach to Addressing Abuse and Oppression in Medical Education. "Encouraged to be Your True Self": An Interpretative Phenomenological Study of Medical Students' Experiences of Role Models in Shaping Sexual Minority Identity in Medical School. Re-Imagining the Patient Panel: Introducing Lived Experiences of Psychosis into the Pre-clerkship Psychiatry Curriculum of a Canadian Medical School. The Influence of Photographic Representations on U.S. Medical Students' Attitudes and Beliefs About Persons With Disabilities: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1