The Italian McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised (MQoL-R): Psychometrics in Neurological and Neoplastic Populations.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Palliative Care Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1177/08258597221123454
Edoardo Nicolò Aiello, Debora Pain, Alice Radici, Elvira Filippelli, Stefania Ruvolo, Francesca Madonia, Annarita Caimi, Cinzia Sguazzin
{"title":"The Italian McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised (MQoL-R): Psychometrics in Neurological and Neoplastic Populations.","authors":"Edoardo Nicolò Aiello,&nbsp;Debora Pain,&nbsp;Alice Radici,&nbsp;Elvira Filippelli,&nbsp;Stefania Ruvolo,&nbsp;Francesca Madonia,&nbsp;Annarita Caimi,&nbsp;Cinzia Sguazzin","doi":"10.1177/08258597221123454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised (MQoL-R) is the gold standard for assessing QoL in end-of-life, chronic patients; however, an Italian standardization is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed at assessing the psychometric properties of the Italian MQoL-R in patients with chronic neurological/oncological conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>177 inpatients with life-threatening, chronic neurological/oncological conditions were consecutively recruited in 8 clinics in Northern/Southern Italy were administered the MQoL-R and the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Factorial structure (Confirmatory Factor Analysis, CFA), reliability (Cronbach's α) and construct validity against the KPS (Pearson's coefficients) were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four-factor model (Physical, Psychological, Existential and Social subscales) was met (comparative fit index = .93; root mean square error of approximation = .07), with all items significantly loading on respective subscales. Internal consistency was good for both the whole scale (Cronbach's α = .83) and subscales (<i>range</i> = .6-.85). The KPS was unrelated to MQoL-R measures, except for the Physical subscale (<i>r</i> = .24).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Italian MQoL-R is a valid and reliable tool to assess QoL in end-of-life, both neoplastic and neurological, chronic inpatients undergoing palliative care, whose adoption is thus encouraged in both clinical practice and research addressed to such populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597221123454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised (MQoL-R) is the gold standard for assessing QoL in end-of-life, chronic patients; however, an Italian standardization is lacking.

Objective: This study aimed at assessing the psychometric properties of the Italian MQoL-R in patients with chronic neurological/oncological conditions.

Methods: 177 inpatients with life-threatening, chronic neurological/oncological conditions were consecutively recruited in 8 clinics in Northern/Southern Italy were administered the MQoL-R and the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Factorial structure (Confirmatory Factor Analysis, CFA), reliability (Cronbach's α) and construct validity against the KPS (Pearson's coefficients) were examined.

Results: The four-factor model (Physical, Psychological, Existential and Social subscales) was met (comparative fit index = .93; root mean square error of approximation = .07), with all items significantly loading on respective subscales. Internal consistency was good for both the whole scale (Cronbach's α = .83) and subscales (range = .6-.85). The KPS was unrelated to MQoL-R measures, except for the Physical subscale (r = .24).

Conclusions: The Italian MQoL-R is a valid and reliable tool to assess QoL in end-of-life, both neoplastic and neurological, chronic inpatients undergoing palliative care, whose adoption is thus encouraged in both clinical practice and research addressed to such populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利麦吉尔生活质量问卷-修订(MQoL-R):神经和肿瘤人群的心理测量学。
背景:麦吉尔生活质量问卷修订版(MQoL-R)是评估生命末期慢性患者生活质量的金标准;然而,意大利的标准化是缺乏的。目的:本研究旨在评估意大利MQoL-R在慢性神经/肿瘤疾病患者中的心理测量特性。方法:在意大利北部/南部的8个诊所连续招募177例危及生命的慢性神经系统/肿瘤住院患者,给予MQoL-R和Karnofsky性能状态(KPS)。检验因子结构(验证性因子分析,CFA)、信度(Cronbach’s α)和构造效度对KPS (Pearson’s系数)的影响。结果:符合四因素模型(生理、心理、存在和社会分量表)(比较拟合指数= 0.93;近似均方根误差= .07),所有项目都在各自的子量表上显著加载。整体量表(Cronbach's α = 0.83)和子量表(范围= 0.6 - 0.85)的内部一致性均良好。除了Physical subscale外,KPS与MQoL-R测量无关(r = 0.24)。结论:意大利MQoL-R是评估临终病人生活质量的有效和可靠的工具,无论是肿瘤还是神经系统,慢性住院患者接受姑息治疗,因此在临床实践和研究中都鼓励采用这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Palliative Care
Journal of Palliative Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Palliative Care is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international and interdisciplinary forum for practical, critical thought on palliative care and palliative medicine. JPC publishes high-quality original research, opinion papers/commentaries, narrative and humanities works, case reports/case series, and reports on international activities and comparative palliative care.
期刊最新文献
Palliative Care in the Midst of Adversity: Insights from a Low-Income Country. Gender Distribution of Editorial Board Members in Palliative Care Journals: Assessment of Gender Parity. Cancer Caregiver Anxiety Over Time: The Influence of Palliative Care. Trends, Predictors, and Potential Disparities of Palliative Care Utilization Among Older Adults With Hip Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample, 2016-2020. Barriers and Facilitators of Palliative Care in Older Adults With Heart Failure: A Qualitative Content Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1