Ricardo Correa da Costa Dias, Maria Noel Marzano Rodrigues, Ivy Kiemle Trindade-Suedam, Sergio Henrique Kiemle Trindade
{"title":"Tomographic Evaluation of the Upper Cervical Spine in Patients with Cleft lip and Palate and Class III Malocclusion.","authors":"Ricardo Correa da Costa Dias, Maria Noel Marzano Rodrigues, Ivy Kiemle Trindade-Suedam, Sergio Henrique Kiemle Trindade","doi":"10.1177/10556656231186968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform a morphometric analysis of the upper cervical spine (UCS) by means of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for the diagnosis of malformations or craniocervical instabilities in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and class III malocclusion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 72 CBCTs from adult patients (48 male and 24 female) with Angle Class III malocclusion were divided into three groups: 1) Unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) (n = 29; male = 65.5%; age = 24, 2 ± 4.2 years); 2) Bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) (n = 18; male = 83.3%; age = 26.4 ± 6.0 years); 3) Control group (CON) (n = 25; male = 56.0%; age = 27.8 ± 9.3 years). The version 11.7 of the Dolphin® software (Chatsworth, California, USA) was used to evaluate the morphometric measurements and anomalies of the UCS. Data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics (p ≤ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the UCLP, BCLP and CON groups, respectively, the measures were: atlantodental interval (2.1 ± 0.5; 2.1 ± 0.4; 2.0 ± 0.3 mm), basion-opisthion (35.9 ± 3.2; 36.4 ± 3.0; 34.7 ± 1.9 mm), hyoid-C3 (34.5 ± 3.7; 34.5 ± 5.2; 35.3 ± 4.5 mm), and hyoid-sella (108.1 ± 9.8; 111.3 ± 9.2; 109.7 ± 10 mm); clivus-canal angle (152.3 ± 13; 150.3 ± 10; 150.7 ± 10°) and Torg-Pavlov index (1.0 ± 0.2; 1.0 ± 0.1; 1.1 ± 0.2). Potentially unstable anomalies and malformations were more prevalent in the UCLP group (34,4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Subjects with UCLP presented compressive or unstable anomalies on upper cervical spine, more frequently than controls and BCLP, despite the lack of statistically significant differences among groups. Future studies could increase the safety of patients and healthcare professionals specialized in craniofacial anomalies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55255,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1894-1900"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231186968","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To perform a morphometric analysis of the upper cervical spine (UCS) by means of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for the diagnosis of malformations or craniocervical instabilities in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and class III malocclusion.
Materials and methods: A total of 72 CBCTs from adult patients (48 male and 24 female) with Angle Class III malocclusion were divided into three groups: 1) Unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) (n = 29; male = 65.5%; age = 24, 2 ± 4.2 years); 2) Bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) (n = 18; male = 83.3%; age = 26.4 ± 6.0 years); 3) Control group (CON) (n = 25; male = 56.0%; age = 27.8 ± 9.3 years). The version 11.7 of the Dolphin® software (Chatsworth, California, USA) was used to evaluate the morphometric measurements and anomalies of the UCS. Data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics (p ≤ 0.05).
Results: For the UCLP, BCLP and CON groups, respectively, the measures were: atlantodental interval (2.1 ± 0.5; 2.1 ± 0.4; 2.0 ± 0.3 mm), basion-opisthion (35.9 ± 3.2; 36.4 ± 3.0; 34.7 ± 1.9 mm), hyoid-C3 (34.5 ± 3.7; 34.5 ± 5.2; 35.3 ± 4.5 mm), and hyoid-sella (108.1 ± 9.8; 111.3 ± 9.2; 109.7 ± 10 mm); clivus-canal angle (152.3 ± 13; 150.3 ± 10; 150.7 ± 10°) and Torg-Pavlov index (1.0 ± 0.2; 1.0 ± 0.1; 1.1 ± 0.2). Potentially unstable anomalies and malformations were more prevalent in the UCLP group (34,4%).
Conclusion: Subjects with UCLP presented compressive or unstable anomalies on upper cervical spine, more frequently than controls and BCLP, despite the lack of statistically significant differences among groups. Future studies could increase the safety of patients and healthcare professionals specialized in craniofacial anomalies.
期刊介绍:
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.