Total knee arthroplasty coronal alignment and tibial base stress-a new numerical evaluation.

João Vale, Luisa V Pinto, Bianca Barros, Sara Diniz, Filipe Rodrigues, Marco Marques, Jorge Belinha, Adélio Vilaça
{"title":"Total knee arthroplasty coronal alignment and tibial base stress-a new numerical evaluation.","authors":"João Vale,&nbsp;Luisa V Pinto,&nbsp;Bianca Barros,&nbsp;Sara Diniz,&nbsp;Filipe Rodrigues,&nbsp;Marco Marques,&nbsp;Jorge Belinha,&nbsp;Adélio Vilaça","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most frequently performed orthopedic procedures. The correct positioning and alignment of the components significantly affects prosthesis survival. Considering the current controversy regarding the target of postoperative alignment of TKA, this study evaluated the tension at tibial component interface using two numerical methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The stress of the prosthesis/bone interface of the proximal tibial component was evaluated using two numerical methods: the finite element method (FEM) and the new meshless method: natural neighbor radial point interpolation method (NNRPIM). The construction of the model was based on Zimmers NexGen LPS-Flex Mobile® prosthesis and simulated the forces by using a free-body diagram.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tibiofemoral mechanical axis (TFMA) for which a higher number of nodes are under optimal mechanical tension is between 1° valgus 2° varus. For values outside the interval, there are regions under the tibial plate at risk of bone absorption. At the extremities of the tibial plate of the prosthesis, both medial and lateral, independent of the alignment, are under a low stress. In all nodes evaluated for all TFMA, the values of the effective stresses were higher in the NNRPIM when compared with the FEM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through this study, we can corroborate that the optimal postoperative alignment is within the values that are currently considered of 0 ± 3° varus. It was verified that the meshless methods obtain smoother and more conservative results, which may make them safer when transposed to the clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"8 2","pages":"e208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porto biomedical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most frequently performed orthopedic procedures. The correct positioning and alignment of the components significantly affects prosthesis survival. Considering the current controversy regarding the target of postoperative alignment of TKA, this study evaluated the tension at tibial component interface using two numerical methods.

Methods: The stress of the prosthesis/bone interface of the proximal tibial component was evaluated using two numerical methods: the finite element method (FEM) and the new meshless method: natural neighbor radial point interpolation method (NNRPIM). The construction of the model was based on Zimmers NexGen LPS-Flex Mobile® prosthesis and simulated the forces by using a free-body diagram.

Results: Tibiofemoral mechanical axis (TFMA) for which a higher number of nodes are under optimal mechanical tension is between 1° valgus 2° varus. For values outside the interval, there are regions under the tibial plate at risk of bone absorption. At the extremities of the tibial plate of the prosthesis, both medial and lateral, independent of the alignment, are under a low stress. In all nodes evaluated for all TFMA, the values of the effective stresses were higher in the NNRPIM when compared with the FEM.

Conclusion: Through this study, we can corroborate that the optimal postoperative alignment is within the values that are currently considered of 0 ± 3° varus. It was verified that the meshless methods obtain smoother and more conservative results, which may make them safer when transposed to the clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全膝关节置换术中冠状面对齐与胫骨基底应力——一种新的数值评估方法。
背景:全膝关节置换术(TKA)是最常见的骨科手术之一。假体组件的正确定位和对齐显著影响假体的存活。考虑到目前关于TKA术后对准目标的争议,本研究采用两种数值方法评估胫骨组件界面张力。方法:采用有限元法(FEM)和新型无网格法:自然邻点径向插值法(NNRPIM)两种数值方法对胫骨近端假体/骨界面应力进行评估。模型的构建基于Zimmers NexGen LPS-Flex Mobile®假体,采用自由体图模拟受力。结果:胫骨股骨机械轴(TFMA)处于1°外翻和2°内翻之间,在最佳机械张力下有较多的节点。对于间隔之外的值,胫骨板下的区域存在骨吸收的风险。在假体胫骨板的末端,内侧和外侧,独立于对齐,处于低应力下。在所有TFMA评估的所有节点中,与FEM相比,NNRPIM的有效应力值更高。结论:通过本研究,我们可以证实,最佳的术后对齐值在目前认为的0±3°内翻范围内。结果表明,无网格方法得到的结果更平滑、更保守,应用于临床更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From the armchair to contemporary cardiac rehabilitation: the remarkable ongoing journey of exercise training in ischemic heart disease. Serum total bilirubin is a risk factor of metabolic syndrome and its components in obese Egyptians. Emerging perspectives in the management of IgA nephropathy: a comprehensive review. Microbiological profile and antibiotic susceptibility profile of urine cultures in patients with spinal cord injury-retrospective study. Rare extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: a diagnostic challenge and therapeutic approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1