Intersectional Inequalities in Anthropometric Failure among Indian Children: Evidence from the National Family Health Survey (2015-2016).

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Journal of Biosocial Science Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1017/S0021932022000323
Tulsi Adhikari, Niharika Tripathi, Jeetendra Yadav, Himanshu Tolani, M Vishnu Vardhana Rao, Harpreet Kaur, Manjeet Singh Chalga
{"title":"Intersectional Inequalities in Anthropometric Failure among Indian Children: Evidence from the National Family Health Survey (2015-2016).","authors":"Tulsi Adhikari,&nbsp;Niharika Tripathi,&nbsp;Jeetendra Yadav,&nbsp;Himanshu Tolani,&nbsp;M Vishnu Vardhana Rao,&nbsp;Harpreet Kaur,&nbsp;Manjeet Singh Chalga","doi":"10.1017/S0021932022000323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasing body of health planning and policy research focused upon unravelling the fundamental drivers of population health and nutrition inequities, such as wealth status, educational status, caste/ethnicity, gender, place of residence, and geographical context, that often interact to produce health inequalities. However, very few studies have employed intersectional framework to explicitly demonstrate how intersecting dimensions of privilege, power, and resources form the burden of anthropometric failures of children among low-and-middle income countries including India. Data on 2,15,554 sampled children below 5 years of age from the National Family Health Survey 2015-2016 were analysed. This study employed intersectional approach to examine caste group inequalities in the anthropometric failure (i.e. moderate stunting, severe stunting, moderate underweight, severe underweight, moderate wasting, severe wasting) among children in India. Descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression models were fitted to investigate the heterogeneities in the burden of anthropometric failure across demographic, socioeconomic and contextual factors. Interaction effects were estimated to model the joint effects of socioeconomic position (household wealth, maternal education, urban/rural residence and geographical region) and caste groups with the likelihood of anthropometric failure among children.More than half of under-5 children suffered from anthropometric failure in India. Net of the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, children from the disadvantageous caste groups whose mother were illiterate, belonged to economically poor households, resided in the rural areas, and coming from the central and eastern regions experienced disproportionately higher risk of anthropometric failure than their counterparts in India. Concerted policy processes must recognize the existing heterogeneities between and within population groups to improve the precision targeting of the beneficiary and enhance the efficiency of the nutritional program among under-5 children, particularly for the historically marginalized caste groups in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":47742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosocial Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosocial Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932022000323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing body of health planning and policy research focused upon unravelling the fundamental drivers of population health and nutrition inequities, such as wealth status, educational status, caste/ethnicity, gender, place of residence, and geographical context, that often interact to produce health inequalities. However, very few studies have employed intersectional framework to explicitly demonstrate how intersecting dimensions of privilege, power, and resources form the burden of anthropometric failures of children among low-and-middle income countries including India. Data on 2,15,554 sampled children below 5 years of age from the National Family Health Survey 2015-2016 were analysed. This study employed intersectional approach to examine caste group inequalities in the anthropometric failure (i.e. moderate stunting, severe stunting, moderate underweight, severe underweight, moderate wasting, severe wasting) among children in India. Descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression models were fitted to investigate the heterogeneities in the burden of anthropometric failure across demographic, socioeconomic and contextual factors. Interaction effects were estimated to model the joint effects of socioeconomic position (household wealth, maternal education, urban/rural residence and geographical region) and caste groups with the likelihood of anthropometric failure among children.More than half of under-5 children suffered from anthropometric failure in India. Net of the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, children from the disadvantageous caste groups whose mother were illiterate, belonged to economically poor households, resided in the rural areas, and coming from the central and eastern regions experienced disproportionately higher risk of anthropometric failure than their counterparts in India. Concerted policy processes must recognize the existing heterogeneities between and within population groups to improve the precision targeting of the beneficiary and enhance the efficiency of the nutritional program among under-5 children, particularly for the historically marginalized caste groups in India.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度儿童人体测量失败的交叉不平等:来自全国家庭健康调查(2015-2016)的证据。
越来越多的卫生规划和政策研究侧重于揭示人口健康和营养不平等的基本驱动因素,如财富状况、教育状况、种姓/种族、性别、居住地和地理环境,这些因素往往相互作用,产生健康不平等。然而,很少有研究采用交叉框架来明确展示特权、权力和资源的交叉维度是如何形成包括印度在内的中低收入国家儿童人体测量失败的负担的。分析了2015-2016年全国家庭健康调查中抽样的215,554名5岁以下儿童的数据。本研究采用交叉方法研究种姓群体在印度儿童人体测量失败(即中度发育迟缓,严重发育迟缓,中度体重不足,严重体重不足,中度消瘦,严重消瘦)中的不平等。采用描述性统计和多项逻辑回归模型来研究人口统计学、社会经济和环境因素对人体测量失败负担的异质性。相互作用效应被估计为模拟社会经济地位(家庭财富、母亲教育、城市/农村居住和地理区域)和种姓群体与儿童人体测量失败可能性的联合效应。在印度,超过一半的5岁以下儿童患有人体测量失败。除去人口统计学和社会经济特征,来自弱势种姓群体的儿童,其母亲是文盲,属于经济贫困家庭,居住在农村地区,来自中部和东部地区,与印度的同龄人相比,他们经历了不成比例的更高的人体测量失败风险。协调一致的政策过程必须认识到人口群体之间和内部存在的异质性,以提高对受益人的精确定位,提高5岁以下儿童营养计划的效率,特别是对印度历史上被边缘化的种姓群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Journal of Biosocial Science is a leading interdisciplinary and international journal in the field of biosocial science, the common ground between biology and sociology. It acts as an essential reference guide for all biological and social scientists working in these interdisciplinary areas, including social and biological aspects of reproduction and its control, gerontology, ecology, genetics, applied psychology, sociology, education, criminology, demography, health and epidemiology. Publishing original research papers, short reports, reviews, lectures and book reviews, the journal also includes a Debate section that encourages readers" comments on specific articles, with subsequent response from the original author.
期刊最新文献
Geographical disparities in temporal trends of low birth weight in Saskatchewan from 2002/2003 to 2021/2022: insights from a joinpoint regression analysis. Unveiling disparities: a non-linear decomposition analysis of the gap in menstrual hygiene material use between adolescent women in Aspirational and the remaining districts of India. Beyond the margins: antenatal health and healthcare behaviours among homeless women in Kolkata Municipal Corporation, India. 'They will be like a person with a disease': a qualitative investigation of variation in contraceptive side-effect experiences in Central Oromia, Ethiopia. Geographic inequities in neonatal survival in Nigeria: a cross-sectional evidence from spatial and artificial neural network analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1