{"title":"The impact of cerclage placement on gestational length in women with premature cervical shortening.","authors":"Noga Borochov Hausner, Yael Baumfeld, Shimrit Yaniv-Salem, Batel Hamou, Tali Silberstein","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2022-0444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cervical insufficiency (CI) is a condition consistent with painless cervical dilatation that can lead to preterm delivery. Cervical cerclage is a procedure in which cervical suture is performed for preventing preterm labor in several indications. Late emergency cerclage is technically more challenging compared to elective cerclage, performed earlier during pregnancy, prior to cervical changes. Pregnancy outcomes with emergency cerclage were found to be improved in previous reports, but there is still inconclusive data. To assess the effectiveness and safety of emergency cerclage vs. conservative management with progesterone and/or bed resting, in preventing preterm birth and improving neonatal outcomes in women with clinically evident cervical insufficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study conducted on all women diagnosed with cervical insufficiency between the 16th and 24th gestational week who met the inclusion criteria, from January 2012 to December 2018. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes: time from diagnosis to delivery, duration of pregnancy, birth weight and Apgar score, were compared between women who underwent cerclage and those who treated conservatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty eight women underwent emergency cerclage (cerclage group) and 194 managed with a conservative therapy, progesterone and/or bed rest (control group). Time from diagnosis to delivery 13 weeks vs. 8 weeks and birth weight 2,418 g vs. 1914 g were significantly higher in the first cohort. Average pregnancy duration was three weeks longer in the cerclage group, but that was not significant. No complications occurred in the cerclage group and no difference in mode of delivery were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergency cerclage is an effective and safe procedure in preventing preterm birth and prolongation of pregnancy, in women with cervical insufficiency in the late second trimester.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":"51 6","pages":"782-786"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2022-0444","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Cervical insufficiency (CI) is a condition consistent with painless cervical dilatation that can lead to preterm delivery. Cervical cerclage is a procedure in which cervical suture is performed for preventing preterm labor in several indications. Late emergency cerclage is technically more challenging compared to elective cerclage, performed earlier during pregnancy, prior to cervical changes. Pregnancy outcomes with emergency cerclage were found to be improved in previous reports, but there is still inconclusive data. To assess the effectiveness and safety of emergency cerclage vs. conservative management with progesterone and/or bed resting, in preventing preterm birth and improving neonatal outcomes in women with clinically evident cervical insufficiency.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted on all women diagnosed with cervical insufficiency between the 16th and 24th gestational week who met the inclusion criteria, from January 2012 to December 2018. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes: time from diagnosis to delivery, duration of pregnancy, birth weight and Apgar score, were compared between women who underwent cerclage and those who treated conservatively.
Results: Twenty eight women underwent emergency cerclage (cerclage group) and 194 managed with a conservative therapy, progesterone and/or bed rest (control group). Time from diagnosis to delivery 13 weeks vs. 8 weeks and birth weight 2,418 g vs. 1914 g were significantly higher in the first cohort. Average pregnancy duration was three weeks longer in the cerclage group, but that was not significant. No complications occurred in the cerclage group and no difference in mode of delivery were found.
Conclusions: Emergency cerclage is an effective and safe procedure in preventing preterm birth and prolongation of pregnancy, in women with cervical insufficiency in the late second trimester.
目的:宫颈功能不全(CI)是一种符合无痛宫颈扩张的条件,可导致早产。宫颈环扎术是在几种指征中为预防早产而进行的宫颈缝合手术。晚期紧急环切术在技术上比择期环切术更具挑战性,择期环切术在妊娠早期、宫颈变化之前进行。在以前的报告中,发现紧急环扎术的妊娠结局有所改善,但仍有不确定的数据。评估急诊环扎术与黄体酮和/或卧床保守治疗在预防早产和改善临床明显宫颈功能不全妇女新生儿结局方面的有效性和安全性。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,对2012年1月至2018年12月期间符合纳入标准的所有妊娠16周至24周诊断为宫颈功能不全的妇女进行研究。产科和新生儿结局:比较接受环扎术和保守治疗的妇女从诊断到分娩的时间、妊娠持续时间、出生体重和Apgar评分。结果:28名妇女接受了紧急环切术(环切术组),194名妇女接受了保守治疗、黄体酮和/或卧床休息(对照组)。在第一队列中,从诊断到分娩的时间为13 周vs. 8周,出生体重为2,418 g vs. 1914 g。结扎组的平均妊娠期延长了三周,但这并不显著。结扎组无并发症发生,分娩方式无差异。结论:在妊娠中期晚期宫颈功能不全的妇女中,急诊环切术是一种有效和安全的预防早产和延长妊娠的方法。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.