Use of drug purchase tasks in medications development research: orexin system regulation of cocaine and drug demand.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioural Pharmacology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-22 DOI:10.1097/FBP.0000000000000731
Justin C Strickland, Kevin W Hatton, Lon R Hays, Abner O Rayapati, Joshua A Lile, Craig R Rush, William W Stoops
{"title":"Use of drug purchase tasks in medications development research: orexin system regulation of cocaine and drug demand.","authors":"Justin C Strickland, Kevin W Hatton, Lon R Hays, Abner O Rayapati, Joshua A Lile, Craig R Rush, William W Stoops","doi":"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Commodity purchase tasks provide a useful method for evaluating behavioral economic demand in the human laboratory. Recent research has shown how responding to purchase tasks for blinded drug administration can be used to study abuse liability. This analysis uses data from a human laboratory study to highlight how similar procedures may be particularly useful for understanding momentary changes in drug valuation when screening novel interventions. Eight nontreatment-seeking participants with cocaine use disorder (one with partial data) were enrolled in a cross-over, double-blind, randomized inpatient study. Participants were maintained on the Food and Drug Administration-approved insomnia medication suvorexant (oral; 0, 5, 10, 20 mg/day) in randomized order with experimental sessions completed after at least 3 days of maintenance on each suvorexant dose. Experimental sessions included administration of a sample dose of 0, 10 and 30 mg/70 kg intravenous cocaine. Analyses focused on purchase tasks for the blinded sample dose as well as alcohol, cigarettes and chocolate completed 15 min after the sample dose. As expected based on abuse liability, near zero demand was observed for placebo with dose-related increases in cocaine demand. Suvorexant maintenance increased cocaine demand in a dose-related manner with the greatest increase observed for the 10 mg/kg cocaine dose. Increased demand under suvorexant maintenance was also observed for alcohol. No effect of cocaine administration was observed for alcohol, cigarette, or chocolate demand. These data support the validity of demand procedures for measuring blinded drug demand. Findings also parallel self-administration data from this study by showing increases in cocaine use motivation under suvorexant maintenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8832,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Pharmacology","volume":"34 5","pages":"275-286"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000731","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Commodity purchase tasks provide a useful method for evaluating behavioral economic demand in the human laboratory. Recent research has shown how responding to purchase tasks for blinded drug administration can be used to study abuse liability. This analysis uses data from a human laboratory study to highlight how similar procedures may be particularly useful for understanding momentary changes in drug valuation when screening novel interventions. Eight nontreatment-seeking participants with cocaine use disorder (one with partial data) were enrolled in a cross-over, double-blind, randomized inpatient study. Participants were maintained on the Food and Drug Administration-approved insomnia medication suvorexant (oral; 0, 5, 10, 20 mg/day) in randomized order with experimental sessions completed after at least 3 days of maintenance on each suvorexant dose. Experimental sessions included administration of a sample dose of 0, 10 and 30 mg/70 kg intravenous cocaine. Analyses focused on purchase tasks for the blinded sample dose as well as alcohol, cigarettes and chocolate completed 15 min after the sample dose. As expected based on abuse liability, near zero demand was observed for placebo with dose-related increases in cocaine demand. Suvorexant maintenance increased cocaine demand in a dose-related manner with the greatest increase observed for the 10 mg/kg cocaine dose. Increased demand under suvorexant maintenance was also observed for alcohol. No effect of cocaine administration was observed for alcohol, cigarette, or chocolate demand. These data support the validity of demand procedures for measuring blinded drug demand. Findings also parallel self-administration data from this study by showing increases in cocaine use motivation under suvorexant maintenance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在药物开发研究中使用药物购买任务:可卡因和药物需求的奥曲肽系统调控。
商品购买任务为人类实验室评估行为经济需求提供了一种有用的方法。最近的研究表明,对盲目给药的购买任务做出反应可用于研究滥用责任。本分析使用了一项人体实验室研究的数据,以强调在筛选新型干预措施时,类似的程序对于了解药物估值的瞬间变化可能特别有用。八名患有可卡因使用障碍的非治疗参与者(其中一人有部分数据)参加了一项交叉、双盲、随机住院研究。参与者按随机顺序服用美国食品药品管理局批准的失眠药物舒眠灵(口服;0、5、10、20 毫克/天),每个舒眠灵剂量至少服用 3 天后完成实验疗程。实验过程包括静脉注射剂量为 0、10 和 30 毫克/70 千克的可卡因样本。分析的重点是盲法样本剂量的购买任务以及在样本剂量后 15 分钟完成的酒精、香烟和巧克力的购买任务。正如根据滥用责任所预期的那样,安慰剂的需求量几乎为零,而可卡因的需求量则与剂量有关。舒伐雷司维持治疗可卡因需求量的增加与剂量有关,10 毫克/千克可卡因剂量的增幅最大。在服用舒维坦的情况下,酒精的需求量也有所增加。对酒精、香烟或巧克力的需求没有观察到可卡因给药的影响。这些数据证明了盲法药物需求测量程序的有效性。研究结果还与本研究中的自我给药数据相似,显示在舒维坦维持状态下可卡因使用动机会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Pharmacology
Behavioural Pharmacology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Pharmacology accepts original full and short research reports in diverse areas ranging from ethopharmacology to the pharmacology of schedule-controlled operant behaviour, provided that their primary focus is behavioural. Suitable topics include drug, chemical and hormonal effects on behaviour, the neurochemical mechanisms under-lying behaviour, and behavioural methods for the study of drug action. Both animal and human studies are welcome; however, studies reporting neurochemical data should have a predominantly behavioural focus, and human studies should not consist exclusively of clinical trials or case reports. Preference is given to studies that demonstrate and develop the potential of behavioural methods, and to papers reporting findings of direct relevance to clinical problems. Papers making a significant theoretical contribution are particularly welcome and, where possible and merited, space is made available for authors to explore fully the theoretical implications of their findings. Reviews of an area of the literature or at an appropriate stage in the development of an author’s own work are welcome. Commentaries in areas of current interest are also considered for publication, as are Reviews and Commentaries in areas outside behavioural pharmacology, but of importance and interest to behavioural pharmacologists. Behavioural Pharmacology publishes frequent Special Issues on current hot topics. The editors welcome correspondence about whether a paper in preparation might be suitable for inclusion in a Special Issue.
期刊最新文献
Norharmane potentiated anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like responses induced by imipramine and citalopram: an isobologram analysis. Evaluation of akathisia in patients receiving selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. Over-the-counter analgesic usage: associations with attentional biases in young women. An investigation of economic interactions between social reinforcement and heroin or cocaine in rats. The administration of a phentolamine infusion into the basolateral amygdala enhances long-term memory and diminishes anxiety-like behavior in stressed rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1