Indomethacin Prophylaxis Is Associated with Reduced Risk of Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Extremely Preterm Infants Born in the Context of Amniotic Infection Syndrome.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Neonatology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000529140
Kathrin Hanke, Ingmar Fortmann, Alexander Humberg, Kirstin Faust, Angela Kribs, Sebastian Prager, Ursula Felderhoff-Müser, Marcus Krüger, Matthias Heckmann, Anja Jäger, Oliver Andres, Juliane Spiegler, Christoph Härtel, Egbert Herting, Wolfgang Göpel
{"title":"Indomethacin Prophylaxis Is Associated with Reduced Risk of Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Extremely Preterm Infants Born in the Context of Amniotic Infection Syndrome.","authors":"Kathrin Hanke,&nbsp;Ingmar Fortmann,&nbsp;Alexander Humberg,&nbsp;Kirstin Faust,&nbsp;Angela Kribs,&nbsp;Sebastian Prager,&nbsp;Ursula Felderhoff-Müser,&nbsp;Marcus Krüger,&nbsp;Matthias Heckmann,&nbsp;Anja Jäger,&nbsp;Oliver Andres,&nbsp;Juliane Spiegler,&nbsp;Christoph Härtel,&nbsp;Egbert Herting,&nbsp;Wolfgang Göpel","doi":"10.1159/000529140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amniotic infection syndrome (AIS) with perinatal inflammation may increase the susceptibility to intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in preterm infants. Given its anti-inflammatory and ductus arteriosus constricting capacities, we hypothesized that prophylactic administration of indomethacin reduces the incidence, severity, and consequences of IVH in the context of perinatal inflammation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated data of infants born between 2009 and 2020 of 22 + 0-25+6 weeks of gestation from 68 German Neonatal Network centers. The effect of indomethacin prophylaxis on outcomes was analyzed in univariate analyses and multivariate regression models including a subgroup of infants with available data on 5-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4760 infants were included with a median gestational age of 24.6 SSW [interquartile range (IQR) 24.1w-25.2w] and a birth weight of 640 g [IQR 550-750 g]. 1767/4760 (37.1%) preterm infants were born in the context of AIS and 527/4760 (11.1%) received indomethacin prophylaxis. AIS infants receiving prophylactic indomethacin had lower rates of IVH (32.7% vs. 36.9%, p = 0.04), IVH III/IV (9.7% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.02) and the combined outcome of severe IVH or death (15.9% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.01) as compared to infants without prophylaxis. Multivariate logistic regression analyses confirmed our observations. In a subgroup analysis of 730 preterm infants at 5 years of age, we did not find any correlation between prophylactic indomethacin and intelligence quotient &lt;70 or cerebral palsy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our observational data demonstrate that prophylactic indomethacin is associated with a reduced risk of IVH in the highly vulnerable subgroup of preterm infants &lt;26 weeks of gestation born from AIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18924,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":"120 3","pages":"334-343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529140","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Amniotic infection syndrome (AIS) with perinatal inflammation may increase the susceptibility to intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in preterm infants. Given its anti-inflammatory and ductus arteriosus constricting capacities, we hypothesized that prophylactic administration of indomethacin reduces the incidence, severity, and consequences of IVH in the context of perinatal inflammation.

Methods: We evaluated data of infants born between 2009 and 2020 of 22 + 0-25+6 weeks of gestation from 68 German Neonatal Network centers. The effect of indomethacin prophylaxis on outcomes was analyzed in univariate analyses and multivariate regression models including a subgroup of infants with available data on 5-year follow-up.

Results: 4760 infants were included with a median gestational age of 24.6 SSW [interquartile range (IQR) 24.1w-25.2w] and a birth weight of 640 g [IQR 550-750 g]. 1767/4760 (37.1%) preterm infants were born in the context of AIS and 527/4760 (11.1%) received indomethacin prophylaxis. AIS infants receiving prophylactic indomethacin had lower rates of IVH (32.7% vs. 36.9%, p = 0.04), IVH III/IV (9.7% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.02) and the combined outcome of severe IVH or death (15.9% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.01) as compared to infants without prophylaxis. Multivariate logistic regression analyses confirmed our observations. In a subgroup analysis of 730 preterm infants at 5 years of age, we did not find any correlation between prophylactic indomethacin and intelligence quotient <70 or cerebral palsy.

Conclusions: Our observational data demonstrate that prophylactic indomethacin is associated with a reduced risk of IVH in the highly vulnerable subgroup of preterm infants <26 weeks of gestation born from AIS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吲哚美辛预防与羊膜感染综合征下极早产儿脑室内出血风险降低相关
背景:羊膜感染综合征(AIS)伴围产期炎症可增加早产儿脑室内出血(IVH)的易感性。鉴于其抗炎和收缩动脉导管的能力,我们假设在围产期炎症的情况下,预防性使用吲哚美辛可以降低IVH的发生率、严重程度和后果。方法:我们评估了来自68个德国新生儿网络中心的2009年至2020年出生的22 + 0-25+6周妊娠婴儿的数据。采用单因素分析和多因素回归模型分析吲哚美辛预防对结局的影响,包括一组有5年随访数据的婴儿亚组。结果:纳入4760例婴儿,中位胎龄为24.6 SSW[四分位间距24.1w-25.2w],出生体重为640 g[四分位间距550-750 g]。1767/4760(37.1%)早产儿在AIS背景下出生,527/4760(11.1%)接受了吲哚美辛预防。接受预防性吲哚美辛治疗的AIS婴儿IVH发生率(32.7%比36.9%,p = 0.04)、IVH III/IV发生率(9.7%比16.0%,p = 0.02)以及严重IVH或死亡的综合结局(15.9%比23.2%,p = 0.01)均低于未接受预防的婴儿。多元逻辑回归分析证实了我们的观察结果。在对730名5岁早产儿的亚组分析中,我们没有发现预防性吲哚美辛与智商[lt;70]或脑瘫之间的任何相关性。结论:我们的观察数据表明,预防性吲哚美辛与高度易感亚组(妊娠26周的AIS早产儿)IVH风险降低相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neonatology
Neonatology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This highly respected and frequently cited journal is a prime source of information in the area of fetal and neonatal research. Original papers present research on all aspects of neonatology, fetal medicine and developmental biology. These papers encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology. Basic science research covers molecular biology, molecular genetics, physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology in fetal and neonatal life. In addition to the classic features the journal accepts papers for the sections Research Briefings and Sources of Neonatal Medicine (historical pieces). Papers reporting results of animal studies should be based upon hypotheses that relate to developmental processes or disorders in the human fetus or neonate.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Maternal and Perinatal Factors on the Neonatal Electrocardiogram Front & Back Matter Front & Back Matter Front & Back Matter Therapeutic Hypothermia for Neonatal Encephalopathy in Low-Resource Settings: Methodological Inaccuracies and Inconsistencies in the Latest Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1