What is the health status of girls and boys in the COVID-19 pandemic? Selected results of the KIDA study.

Julika Loss, Miriam Blume, Laura Neuperdt, Nadine Flerlage, Tim Weihrauch, Kristin Manz, Roma Thamm, Christina Poethko-Müller, Elvira Mauz, Petra Rattay, Jennifer Allen, Mira Tschorn
{"title":"What is the health status of girls and boys in the COVID-19 pandemic? Selected results of the KIDA study.","authors":"Julika Loss,&nbsp;Miriam Blume,&nbsp;Laura Neuperdt,&nbsp;Nadine Flerlage,&nbsp;Tim Weihrauch,&nbsp;Kristin Manz,&nbsp;Roma Thamm,&nbsp;Christina Poethko-Müller,&nbsp;Elvira Mauz,&nbsp;Petra Rattay,&nbsp;Jennifer Allen,&nbsp;Mira Tschorn","doi":"10.25646/11436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is well known that there are gender differences in the health behaviour and physical and mental health of children. The COVID-19 pandemic influenced the health and lifestyles of children and adolescents by changing their living conditions. The present work investigates whether gender differences in selected health indicators are evident more than two years after the onset of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the study Kindergesundheit in Deutschland aktuell (KIDA) (German Children's Health Update), cross-sectional telephone surveys were conducted with parents of 3- to 15-year-olds (n=3,478). Parental information on the general and mental health of the child, on increased need for health care and mental health services, as well as on physical activity and utilisation of sports activities were queried in standardised manner. Gender differences were assessed using Chi<sup>2</sup> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 91% of the girls and 92% of the boys had their general health assessed as being (very) good by their parents (difference not significant, n.s.). An increased need for care and support was indicated for 10.6% of the 3- to 15-year-olds (girls: 9%, boys: 12%, n.s.). Boys met the physical activity recommendations of the WHO significantly more often (60%) than girls (54%). Good to excellent mental health was reported for 93% of both boys and girls. When changes during the pandemic were reported, no differences were found in the responses for girls compared to boys.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gender differences were found for individual parameters and age groups. These differences must be assessed in the context of other social determinants of health, and need to be considered when planning preventive measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25646/11436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is well known that there are gender differences in the health behaviour and physical and mental health of children. The COVID-19 pandemic influenced the health and lifestyles of children and adolescents by changing their living conditions. The present work investigates whether gender differences in selected health indicators are evident more than two years after the onset of the pandemic.

Methods: In the study Kindergesundheit in Deutschland aktuell (KIDA) (German Children's Health Update), cross-sectional telephone surveys were conducted with parents of 3- to 15-year-olds (n=3,478). Parental information on the general and mental health of the child, on increased need for health care and mental health services, as well as on physical activity and utilisation of sports activities were queried in standardised manner. Gender differences were assessed using Chi2 tests.

Results: A total of 91% of the girls and 92% of the boys had their general health assessed as being (very) good by their parents (difference not significant, n.s.). An increased need for care and support was indicated for 10.6% of the 3- to 15-year-olds (girls: 9%, boys: 12%, n.s.). Boys met the physical activity recommendations of the WHO significantly more often (60%) than girls (54%). Good to excellent mental health was reported for 93% of both boys and girls. When changes during the pandemic were reported, no differences were found in the responses for girls compared to boys.

Conclusions: Gender differences were found for individual parameters and age groups. These differences must be assessed in the context of other social determinants of health, and need to be considered when planning preventive measures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID-19大流行期间,女孩和男孩的健康状况如何?KIDA研究的部分结果。
背景:众所周知,儿童的健康行为和身心健康存在性别差异。COVID-19大流行通过改变儿童和青少年的生活条件,影响了他们的健康和生活方式。目前的工作是调查在大流行开始两年多以后,某些健康指标的性别差异是否明显。方法:在KIDA(德国儿童健康更新)研究中,对3- 15岁儿童的父母进行横断面电话调查(n=3,478)。以标准化方式询问了家长关于儿童一般健康和心理健康、对保健和心理健康服务需求增加以及体育活动和体育活动利用情况的信息。使用Chi2试验评估性别差异。结果:共有91%的女孩和92%的男孩的总体健康状况被父母评估为(非常)好(差异不显著,另有说明)。10.6%的3至15岁儿童(女孩:9%,男孩:12%,统计数字)表示需要更多的照顾和支持。男孩达到世卫组织身体活动建议的频率(60%)明显高于女孩(54%)。据报道,93%的男孩和女孩的心理健康状况良好。在报告大流行期间的变化时,没有发现女孩和男孩的反应有什么不同。结论:个体参数和年龄组存在性别差异。必须在健康的其他社会决定因素的背景下评估这些差异,并且在规划预防措施时需要加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health of single mothers and fathers in Germany. Results of the GEDA studies 2019 - 2023. Diabetes surveillance - Laying the groundwork for non-communicable disease surveillance in Germany. Journal of Health Monitoring - what's new in 2024? Type 2 diabetes among people with selected citizenships in Germany: risk, healthcare, complications. Healthcare and health situation of adults with type 2 diabetes in Germany: The study GEDA 2021/2022-Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1