The Mindful Helping and Self-Care Model: Mindful Self-Care and Quality of Life Among a Racially Balanced Sample of Helping Professionals.

Jason T Hotchkiss, Catherine Cook-Cottone
{"title":"The Mindful Helping and Self-Care Model: Mindful Self-Care and Quality of Life Among a Racially Balanced Sample of Helping Professionals.","authors":"Jason T Hotchkiss,&nbsp;Catherine Cook-Cottone","doi":"10.17761/2023-D-22-00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored the Mindful Helping and Self-Care model and validated the Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS) among three racially balanced samples of helping professionals (n = 1,534). The study employed a cross-sectional, self-report design. The racial representation of participants was American Indian (n = 68), Asian (n = 351), African American (n = 384), Latino (n = 325), White (n = 301), and other (n = 114). The MSCS (33 items) showed good internal structure and measurement invariance to support generalizability across the three groups studied. With parsimony for application development, the Brief-MSCS (24 items) had a stronger internal structure across the three groups. Mindful self-care and secondary traumatic stress mediated the relationship between burnout and compassion satisfaction, as the total effects were greater than the direct effects. Mindful self-care practices were associated with reduced burnout risk. Mediation analysis results supported the Mindful Helping and Self-Care model. The empirical foundation for the 33-item MSCS and 24-item Brief-MSCS is further supported in this study. Both are excellent instruments for measuring mindful self-care factors in helping professionals using a behavioral frequency approach in a weekly time context. The Brief-MSCS is a more concise measure, making it particularly useful for application development. The reliability, construct, and concurrent validity of the MSCS and Brief-MSCS were confirmed. Mind-body practice is self-care; expressions vary by racial group and are associated with overall wellness. Future research should focus on professionals and cultures outside North America.</p>","PeriodicalId":38682,"journal":{"name":"International journal of yoga therapy","volume":"33 2023","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of yoga therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17761/2023-D-22-00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study explored the Mindful Helping and Self-Care model and validated the Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS) among three racially balanced samples of helping professionals (n = 1,534). The study employed a cross-sectional, self-report design. The racial representation of participants was American Indian (n = 68), Asian (n = 351), African American (n = 384), Latino (n = 325), White (n = 301), and other (n = 114). The MSCS (33 items) showed good internal structure and measurement invariance to support generalizability across the three groups studied. With parsimony for application development, the Brief-MSCS (24 items) had a stronger internal structure across the three groups. Mindful self-care and secondary traumatic stress mediated the relationship between burnout and compassion satisfaction, as the total effects were greater than the direct effects. Mindful self-care practices were associated with reduced burnout risk. Mediation analysis results supported the Mindful Helping and Self-Care model. The empirical foundation for the 33-item MSCS and 24-item Brief-MSCS is further supported in this study. Both are excellent instruments for measuring mindful self-care factors in helping professionals using a behavioral frequency approach in a weekly time context. The Brief-MSCS is a more concise measure, making it particularly useful for application development. The reliability, construct, and concurrent validity of the MSCS and Brief-MSCS were confirmed. Mind-body practice is self-care; expressions vary by racial group and are associated with overall wellness. Future research should focus on professionals and cultures outside North America.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正念帮助和自我照顾模式:在种族平衡的帮助者样本中正念自我照顾和生活质量。
本研究对正念帮助与自我照顾模型进行了探索,并对正念自我照顾量表(MSCS)在三个种族平衡的助人专业人员样本(n = 1534)中进行了验证。该研究采用了横断面自我报告设计。参与者的种族代表是美洲印第安人(n = 68),亚洲人(n = 351),非洲裔美国人(n = 384),拉丁裔(n = 325),白人(n = 301)和其他(n = 114)。MSCS(33个项目)具有良好的内部结构和测量不变性,支持三组研究的普遍性。由于应用程序开发的简约性,Brief-MSCS(24个项目)在三个组之间具有更强的内部结构。正念自我照顾和继发性创伤应激在职业倦怠和同情满意度之间起中介作用,且总效应大于直接效应。有意识的自我护理实践与降低倦怠风险有关。中介分析结果支持正念帮助和自我照顾模型。本研究进一步支持了33项MSCS和24项Brief-MSCS的实证基础。两者都是很好的工具,用于测量有意识的自我照顾因素,帮助专业人士在每周的时间背景下使用行为频率方法。Brief-MSCS是一种更简洁的度量,使其对应用程序开发特别有用。验证了MSCS和Brief-MSCS的信度、结构和并发效度。身心练习是自我照顾;表达因种族而异,与整体健康有关。未来的研究应该关注北美以外的专业人士和文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of yoga therapy
International journal of yoga therapy Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Biofeedback Using Virtual Reality and Yoga Pranayama Modulates Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Variability in People with and without Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries. Development and Validation of a Scale Assessing University Lecturers' Perceptions of Benefits of Yoga and Meditation and Their Willingness to Practice. Anthropometric Changes in Female Collegiate Athletes Apparent Within 4 Weeks of a Yoga Intervention. Effects of a Yoga-Based Program on Well-Being and Traumatic Stress: A Noncontrolled Trial in Rwanda, Africa. A Review of the Earliest Scientific Studies on Yoga and the Birth of Yoga Therapy in 1924: Swami Kuvalayananda, Founder of the Kaivalyadhama Yoga Institute and the Journal Yoga Mīmāmsā at 100 Years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1