The transvaginal mesh: an overview of indications and contraindications for its use.

Abstract

Introduction: In recent decades, concerns about safety of synthetic non-absorbable materials transvaginally implanted emerged. We aim to define the actual role of synthetic non-absorbable transvaginal mesh (TVM) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and mid-urethral sling (MUS) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), in relation with the worldwide legislative evolution.

Areas covered: While in the United Kingdom MUS is not considered the first-line surgical option, other countries adopt MUS as the main procedure. United States, United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, France banned or paused TVM use for POP repair. At the same time, Germany, Asian, and South American countries adopt TVM after adequate counseling for selected populations such as women affected by or at high risk of POP relapse and contraindication for other surgical routes.

Expert opinion: The worldwide evolution of recommendations determined deep modification of clinical practice, with native tissue repair returning to forefront when the vaginal route is indicated. A more careful evaluation of the safety and efficacy profile of meshes' materials and the assessment of the minimal surgeon's expertise in performing TVM procedures became crucial. A multidisciplinary approach and a high specialization of the hospitals both in performing mesh procedures and in managing complications are mandatory.