Biologics Initiation in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Race and Ethnicity: Results From a Randomized Survey Study.

Julia F Simard, Rong Lu, Titilola O Falasinnu, Matthew C Baker, Saadiya Hawa, Mariani D Deluna, Audra Horomanski, Robert M Fairchild
{"title":"Biologics Initiation in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Race and Ethnicity: Results From a Randomized Survey Study.","authors":"Julia F Simard,&nbsp;Rong Lu,&nbsp;Titilola O Falasinnu,&nbsp;Matthew C Baker,&nbsp;Saadiya Hawa,&nbsp;Mariani D Deluna,&nbsp;Audra Horomanski,&nbsp;Robert M Fairchild","doi":"10.1002/acr2.11573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether the race and ethnicity of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) influences rheumatologists' likelihood of choosing to initiate biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized survey experiment in which identical brief case vignettes of hypothetical patients with RA were sent to US rheumatologists (respondents). Three of the four cases included some level of treatment decision ambiguity whereas the fourth case strongly favored bDMARD initiation. Each respondent was shown the four case vignettes, with the race and ethnicity (Black, Hispanic, White) randomly assigned for each case. Each vignette offered multiple choices for next therapeutic step, which we summarized using frequencies and proportions by race and ethnicity version.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 159 US rheumatologists, we found that for the three cases with some level of treatment decision ambiguity, there was little to no variability in the proportions of respondents who chose to start a biologic for the Black and Hispanic variants (cases 1, 2, and 3). For case 4, respondents generally agreed to start a biologic with some minimal variability across the variants (92.6% for the Black version, 98.1% for the Hispanic version, and 96.2% for the White version).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are conflicting data regarding bDMARD use and initiation in patients with RA based on the sex and race of the patient. This work adds to this conversation by examining how the next therapeutic step chosen by rheumatologists varied by the race and ethnicity of the hypothetical patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":7084,"journal":{"name":"ACR Open Rheumatology","volume":"5 7","pages":"371-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ae/80/ACR2-5-371.PMC10349254.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR Open Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether the race and ethnicity of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) influences rheumatologists' likelihood of choosing to initiate biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment.

Methods: We conducted a randomized survey experiment in which identical brief case vignettes of hypothetical patients with RA were sent to US rheumatologists (respondents). Three of the four cases included some level of treatment decision ambiguity whereas the fourth case strongly favored bDMARD initiation. Each respondent was shown the four case vignettes, with the race and ethnicity (Black, Hispanic, White) randomly assigned for each case. Each vignette offered multiple choices for next therapeutic step, which we summarized using frequencies and proportions by race and ethnicity version.

Results: Among 159 US rheumatologists, we found that for the three cases with some level of treatment decision ambiguity, there was little to no variability in the proportions of respondents who chose to start a biologic for the Black and Hispanic variants (cases 1, 2, and 3). For case 4, respondents generally agreed to start a biologic with some minimal variability across the variants (92.6% for the Black version, 98.1% for the Hispanic version, and 96.2% for the White version).

Conclusion: There are conflicting data regarding bDMARD use and initiation in patients with RA based on the sex and race of the patient. This work adds to this conversation by examining how the next therapeutic step chosen by rheumatologists varied by the race and ethnicity of the hypothetical patient.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类风湿关节炎的生物制剂起始按种族和民族:来自一项随机调查研究的结果。
目的:探讨类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的种族和民族是否会影响风湿病医生选择启动生物疾病改善抗风湿药物(bDMARD)治疗的可能性。方法:我们进行了一项随机调查实验,将假设的RA患者的相同简短病例插图发送给美国风湿病学家(受访者)。4例中有3例存在一定程度的治疗决策歧义,而第4例强烈支持bDMARD起始治疗。每个被调查者都被展示了四个案例小插图,每个案例随机分配了种族和民族(黑人、西班牙裔、白人)。每个小插曲都为下一个治疗步骤提供了多种选择,我们根据种族和民族版本使用频率和比例进行总结。结果:在159年美国风湿病专家,我们发现三例某种程度的治疗决策模糊,几乎没有变化的比例的受访者选择开始黑人和西班牙裔的生物变异(例1、2和3)。4例,受访者普遍认为开始整个变异生物和一些最小的可变性(92.6%黑色版本,98.1%的西班牙裔的版本,和96.2%的白色版本)。结论:基于患者的性别和种族,关于bDMARD在RA患者中的使用和开始使用的数据存在矛盾。这项工作通过研究风湿病学家如何根据假设患者的种族和民族不同而选择下一步治疗步骤,从而增加了这一对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Redox Pathogenesis in Rheumatic Diseases. Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis Associated With Alterations in the Gastrointestinal Microbiota. CD14+ Dendritic-Shaped Cells Functioning as Dendritic Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Tissues. Patient-Led Urate Self-Monitoring to Improve Clinical Outcomes in People With Gout: A Feasibility Study. Detection and Grading of Radiographic Hand Osteoarthritis Using an Automated Machine Learning Platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1