Association of age with death and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy after severe traumatic brain injury.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.013721
Alexandre Tran, Victoria Saigle, Neraj Manhas, Lauralyn McIntyre, Alexis F Turgeon, François Lauzier, Michael Chassé, Colleen Golka, Scott J Millington, Kwadwo Kyeremanteng, Diana Ghinda, Howard Lesiuk, Salmaan Kanji, Jennifer Fairbairn, Tammy Lloyd, Shane W English
{"title":"Association of age with death and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy after severe traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Alexandre Tran,&nbsp;Victoria Saigle,&nbsp;Neraj Manhas,&nbsp;Lauralyn McIntyre,&nbsp;Alexis F Turgeon,&nbsp;François Lauzier,&nbsp;Michael Chassé,&nbsp;Colleen Golka,&nbsp;Scott J Millington,&nbsp;Kwadwo Kyeremanteng,&nbsp;Diana Ghinda,&nbsp;Howard Lesiuk,&nbsp;Salmaan Kanji,&nbsp;Jennifer Fairbairn,&nbsp;Tammy Lloyd,&nbsp;Shane W English","doi":"10.1503/cjs.013721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compared to younger age, older age (≥ 65 yr) is associated with worse outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We sought to describe the association of older age with in-hospital death and aggressiveness of intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult (age ≥ 16 yr) patients with severe TBI admitted to a single academic tertiary care neurotrauma centre between January 2014 and December 2015. We collected data through chart review as well as from our institutional administrative database. We provided descriptive statistics and used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the independent association of age with the primary outcome, in-hospital death. The secondary outcome was early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 126 adult patients (median age 67 yr [Q1-Q3, 33-80 yr]) with severe TBI during the study period who met our eligibility criteria. The most common mechanism was high-velocity blunt injury (55 patients [43.6%]). The median Marshall score was 4 (Q1-Q3, 2-6), and the median Injury Severity Score was 26 (Q1-Q3, 25-35). After controlling for confounders including clinical frailty, pre-existing comorbidity, injury severity, Marshall score and neurologic examination at admission, we observed that older patients were more likely than younger patients to die in hospital (odds ratio 5.10, 95% confidence interval 1.65-15.78). Older patients were also more likely to experience early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy and less likely to receive invasive interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After controlling for confounding factors relevant to older patients, we observed that age was an important and independent predictor of in-hospital death and early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. The mechanism by which age influences clinical decision-making independent of global and neurologic injury severity, clinical frailty and comorbidities remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6e/26/066E348.PMC10322160.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.013721","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Compared to younger age, older age (≥ 65 yr) is associated with worse outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We sought to describe the association of older age with in-hospital death and aggressiveness of intervention.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult (age ≥ 16 yr) patients with severe TBI admitted to a single academic tertiary care neurotrauma centre between January 2014 and December 2015. We collected data through chart review as well as from our institutional administrative database. We provided descriptive statistics and used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the independent association of age with the primary outcome, in-hospital death. The secondary outcome was early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.

Results: There were 126 adult patients (median age 67 yr [Q1-Q3, 33-80 yr]) with severe TBI during the study period who met our eligibility criteria. The most common mechanism was high-velocity blunt injury (55 patients [43.6%]). The median Marshall score was 4 (Q1-Q3, 2-6), and the median Injury Severity Score was 26 (Q1-Q3, 25-35). After controlling for confounders including clinical frailty, pre-existing comorbidity, injury severity, Marshall score and neurologic examination at admission, we observed that older patients were more likely than younger patients to die in hospital (odds ratio 5.10, 95% confidence interval 1.65-15.78). Older patients were also more likely to experience early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy and less likely to receive invasive interventions.

Conclusion: After controlling for confounding factors relevant to older patients, we observed that age was an important and independent predictor of in-hospital death and early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. The mechanism by which age influences clinical decision-making independent of global and neurologic injury severity, clinical frailty and comorbidities remains unclear.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年龄与严重创伤性脑损伤后死亡和停止维持生命治疗的关系
背景:与年轻人相比,年龄较大(≥65岁)与严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的预后较差相关。我们试图描述老年与院内死亡和干预力度的关系。方法:我们对2014年1月至2015年12月在一家学术三级护理神经创伤中心住院的成人(年龄≥16岁)严重TBI患者进行了回顾性队列研究。我们通过图表审查和机构行政数据库收集数据。我们提供了描述性统计,并使用多变量逻辑回归来评估年龄与主要结局(院内死亡)的独立关联。次要结局是早期停止生命维持治疗。结果:在研究期间,有126例符合我们的入选标准的严重TBI成年患者(中位年龄67岁[Q1-Q3, 33-80岁])。最常见的机制是高速钝性损伤(55例[43.6%])。Marshall评分中位数为4 (q1 - q3,2 -6),损伤严重程度评分中位数为26 (q1 - q3,25 -35)。在控制混杂因素包括临床虚弱、既往共病、损伤严重程度、Marshall评分和入院时神经系统检查后,我们观察到老年患者比年轻患者更有可能在医院死亡(优势比5.10,95%置信区间1.65-15.78)。老年患者也更有可能早期退出维持生命的治疗,更不可能接受侵入性干预。结论:在控制了与老年患者相关的混杂因素后,我们发现年龄是院内死亡和早期停止生命维持治疗的重要独立预测因素。年龄影响临床决策的机制不受全局和神经损伤严重程度、临床虚弱和合并症的影响,目前尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
期刊最新文献
Reasons for 90-day emergency department visits after primary knee arthroplasty. Re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer: an Albertan perspective. Perceptions of readiness for independent practice among graduating orthopedic surgery residents in Ontario in the last 30 years. Injury and violence in the context of sustainable development: The first Bethune Round Table in Africa, Bethune Round Table 2024, Conference on Global Surgery, May 16-18, 2024, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Difficult legal precedent established for rural surgical competency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1