Information booklet for promoting self-efficacy in childhood asthma: construction and validity.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0461en
Flávia Ximenes Vasconcelos, Lorena Pinheiro Barbosa, Francisca Elisângela Teixeira Lima, Leidiane Minervina Moraes de Sabino, Kamila Ferreira Lima, Elizamar Regina da Rocha Mendes
{"title":"Information booklet for promoting self-efficacy in childhood asthma: construction and validity.","authors":"Flávia Ximenes Vasconcelos,&nbsp;Lorena Pinheiro Barbosa,&nbsp;Francisca Elisângela Teixeira Lima,&nbsp;Leidiane Minervina Moraes de Sabino,&nbsp;Kamila Ferreira Lima,&nbsp;Elizamar Regina da Rocha Mendes","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0461en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To construct and validate the content and appearance of an information booklet to promote self-efficacy of parents and/or caregivers in childhood asthma management and control.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a methodological study, developed from educational material elaboration, validity and assessment by 25 content judges and three technical judges. Language clarity, practical pertinence and theoretical relevance were used, calculating the Content Validity Coefficient (CVC) for validity, and the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) instrument was applied for assessment. Judges were also able to make suggestions for modifications on each page of the booklet. Pages that reached a CVC ≥ 0.80 for content judges and CVC ≥ 0.70 for technical judges were considered validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total CVC of the booklet was 0.96 for content judges and 0.83 for technical judges. The educational material was considered superior according to the SAM, with a total score of 92.67% for content judges and 73.81% for technical judges. Changes were made to the booklet after the validity process, according to judges' suggestions, resulting in a second version.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The information booklet is valid and has a high degree of recommendation for use with parents and/or caregivers in childhood asthma control and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21229,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10332814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0461en","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To construct and validate the content and appearance of an information booklet to promote self-efficacy of parents and/or caregivers in childhood asthma management and control.

Method: This is a methodological study, developed from educational material elaboration, validity and assessment by 25 content judges and three technical judges. Language clarity, practical pertinence and theoretical relevance were used, calculating the Content Validity Coefficient (CVC) for validity, and the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) instrument was applied for assessment. Judges were also able to make suggestions for modifications on each page of the booklet. Pages that reached a CVC ≥ 0.80 for content judges and CVC ≥ 0.70 for technical judges were considered validated.

Results: The total CVC of the booklet was 0.96 for content judges and 0.83 for technical judges. The educational material was considered superior according to the SAM, with a total score of 92.67% for content judges and 73.81% for technical judges. Changes were made to the booklet after the validity process, according to judges' suggestions, resulting in a second version.

Conclusion: The information booklet is valid and has a high degree of recommendation for use with parents and/or caregivers in childhood asthma control and management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进儿童哮喘自我效能感的资料小册子:结构与效度。
目的:构建并验证信息手册的内容和外观,以提高家长和/或照顾者在儿童哮喘管理和控制中的自我效能感。方法:本研究是一项方法论研究,由25名内容评委和3名技术评委从教材编写、效度和评估三个方面展开。采用语言清晰性、实际针对性和理论相关性,计算内容效度系数(CVC)为效度,采用材料适用性评估(SAM)量表进行评估。评委们还可以对小册子的每一页提出修改建议。内容评委CVC≥0.80,技术评委CVC≥0.70的页面被认为是有效的。结果:内容评委的CVC为0.96,技术评委的CVC为0.83。根据SAM,教育材料被认为是优秀的,内容评委的总分为92.67%,技术评委的总分为73.81%。根据评委的建议,在有效程序结束后,对小册子进行了修改,产生了第二版。结论:该信息手册是有效的,高度推荐家长和/或照顾者在儿童哮喘控制和管理中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The University of São Paulo Nursing School Journal (Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, REEUSP) is a bimonthly periodical revised by fellow nurses, which has the objective of publishing empirical or theoretical articles that represent a significant advance for the professional practice or for the fundaments of Nursing Mission: to stimulate knowledge production and dissemination in Nursing and related areas, focusing on international interlocution to advance Nursing science. Areas of Interest: Nursing and Health Its abbreviated title is Rev Esc Enferm USP, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
Intensity and frequency of moral distress in mental health nurses in Brazil. Misinformation about COVID-19 among middle-aged and older migrants residing in Brazil and Portugal. Access to health services for international migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. Pejotização and implications for nursing work in Brazil: repercussions of neoliberalism. Parental stress during pregnancy and maternity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1