The Outcome Of The Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique For The Repair Of Large Idiopathic Macular Holes.

Muhammad Usman Jamil, Syed Fawad Rizvi, Aysal Mahmood
{"title":"The Outcome Of The Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique For The Repair Of Large Idiopathic Macular Holes.","authors":"Muhammad Usman Jamil,&nbsp;Syed Fawad Rizvi,&nbsp;Aysal Mahmood","doi":"10.55519/JAMC-02-11536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Full-thickness macular hole is defined as an anatomical defect in the fovea that spans from the internal limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelium, assessed by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. The Objectives of the study are to determine the anatomical and visual outcome in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy along with inverted internal limiting flap closure in large idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (>400 μm).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective interventional study was conducted at a tertiary teaching eye hospital in Karachi, where patients of either gender and having macular holes greater than >400 μm were recruited. The study was conducted From January 9 to July 8, 2022, and all patients underwent pre-operative fundus examination and pars plana vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap closure. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS 23. Follow-ups were conducted at 1 and 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 94 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 49.17±13.8 years. The mean duration of symptoms was 3.1±1.4 months. The mean pre-operative macular hole diameter was 854.31±08.36 μm and Stage 3 and 4 MH was present in 36.2% and 63.8% of patients, respectively. Anatomical closure was achieved in 93.6% of eyes (n=88/94). Pre-operative mean BCVA was LogMAR 0.90±0.24, which improved to LogMAR mean 0.70±0.27 at the final follow-up. As of the last follow-up, 92.6% of patients showed improved visual outcomes, with a mean three-line improvement in Snellen lines. After data stratification, no statistically significant result was obtained.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of the inverted ILM flap technique resulted in improved anatomical and visual outcomes, in cases of large idiopathic macular holes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15141,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC","volume":"35 2","pages":"190-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-02-11536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Full-thickness macular hole is defined as an anatomical defect in the fovea that spans from the internal limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelium, assessed by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. The Objectives of the study are to determine the anatomical and visual outcome in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy along with inverted internal limiting flap closure in large idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (>400 μm).

Methods: A prospective interventional study was conducted at a tertiary teaching eye hospital in Karachi, where patients of either gender and having macular holes greater than >400 μm were recruited. The study was conducted From January 9 to July 8, 2022, and all patients underwent pre-operative fundus examination and pars plana vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap closure. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS 23. Follow-ups were conducted at 1 and 3 months.

Results: A total of 94 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 49.17±13.8 years. The mean duration of symptoms was 3.1±1.4 months. The mean pre-operative macular hole diameter was 854.31±08.36 μm and Stage 3 and 4 MH was present in 36.2% and 63.8% of patients, respectively. Anatomical closure was achieved in 93.6% of eyes (n=88/94). Pre-operative mean BCVA was LogMAR 0.90±0.24, which improved to LogMAR mean 0.70±0.27 at the final follow-up. As of the last follow-up, 92.6% of patients showed improved visual outcomes, with a mean three-line improvement in Snellen lines. After data stratification, no statistically significant result was obtained.

Conclusion: The use of the inverted ILM flap technique resulted in improved anatomical and visual outcomes, in cases of large idiopathic macular holes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
倒置内限定膜瓣技术修复特发性黄斑大孔的效果。
背景:全层黄斑孔被定义为一种位于视网膜中央窝的解剖缺陷,从内部限制膜延伸到视网膜色素上皮,通过光谱域光学相干断层扫描进行评估。本研究的目的是确定在特发性全层黄斑大孔(>400 μm)中,行玻璃体部切除并逆行内限制性皮瓣闭合的患者的解剖学和视觉结果。方法:在卡拉奇一家三级眼科教学医院进行前瞻性介入研究,招募黄斑孔洞大于>400 μm的患者,男女皆可。本研究于2022年1月9日至7月8日进行,所有患者均行术前眼底检查和玻璃体部玻璃体切除术并逆行ILM瓣关闭。数据录入并使用SPSS 23进行分析。随访时间分别为1个月和3个月。结果:共入组94例患者,平均年龄49.17±13.8岁。平均症状持续时间为3.1±1.4个月。术前平均黄斑孔直径854.31±08.36 μm, 3期和4期MH分别占36.2%和63.8%。93.6%的眼睛(n=88/94)实现了解剖闭合。术前平均BCVA为LogMAR 0.90±0.24,最终随访时LogMAR平均值为0.70±0.27。截至最后一次随访,92.6%的患者表现出视力改善,Snellen线平均改善3条线。数据分层后,无统计学意义。结论:对于大的特发性黄斑裂孔,应用内翻式ILM瓣技术可以改善解剖和视觉效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
期刊最新文献
REFRACTORY SARCOIDOSIS Cytogenetic Profiling In Paediatric Acute Leukaemia; A Report On 746 Newly Diagnosed Paediatric Cases Analyzing The Spectrum Of Recurring Chromosomal Rearrangements In B Cell Lymphoblastic And Acute Myeloid Leukaemia. Risk Loci For Chronic Obstructive Disease Reside On Chromosome 14: A Case-Control Study On The Pakistani Population. Giant Penoscrotal Lymphedema: Planning And Surgical Technique To Treat A Rare Debilitating Disease. Management And Assessment Of Indeterminate (U3) Thyroid Nodules: A 5-Year Multisite Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1