Effect of Electrocoagulation and Direct Pressure Application on Bleeding from Liver Bed During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2023.07.754
Muhammad Awais, Muhammad Hassan Masood, Arslan Ahmed, Sundas Irshad, Imran Aslam, Khalid Masood Gondal
{"title":"Effect of Electrocoagulation and Direct Pressure Application on Bleeding from Liver Bed During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.","authors":"Muhammad Awais,&nbsp;Muhammad Hassan Masood,&nbsp;Arslan Ahmed,&nbsp;Sundas Irshad,&nbsp;Imran Aslam,&nbsp;Khalid Masood Gondal","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2023.07.754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of electrocoagulation and direct pressure application in controlling haemorrhage from the liver bed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of General Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from July 2021 to December 2021.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A total of 218 patients of either gender, aged 18 to 60 years and with bleeding from the liver bed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to two groups of haemorrhage control techniques. In group A, electrocoagulation was used and in group B, direct pressure was applied to the bleeding area for 5 minutes. Efficacy in controlling bleeding was compared in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of all study participants was 44.6 + 13.5 years. The majority of the patients were females (89%). The mean body mass index (BMI) of all participants was 25.3 ± 3.09 kg/m2. Intraoperative bleeding was secured in 86.2% of patients in Group A vs. 81.7% of patients in Group B. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.356). In 27 (12.4%) cases, bleeding could not be controlled by both of these techniques. In these cases, endosuturing was applied in 19 (70.4%) cases, spongostan in 6 (22.2%) cases, and endo-clips in 2 (7.4%) cases. Intraoperative drain and conversion to open procedure was required in 1 patient each, both belonging to the direct pressure application group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of electrocoagulation in securing haemorrhage from the liver bed is better than the direct pressure application technique.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Haemorrhage, Electrocoagulation, Surgical hemostasis, Liver bed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54905,"journal":{"name":"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan","volume":"33 7","pages":"754-759"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2023.07.754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of electrocoagulation and direct pressure application in controlling haemorrhage from the liver bed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of General Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from July 2021 to December 2021.

Methodology: A total of 218 patients of either gender, aged 18 to 60 years and with bleeding from the liver bed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to two groups of haemorrhage control techniques. In group A, electrocoagulation was used and in group B, direct pressure was applied to the bleeding area for 5 minutes. Efficacy in controlling bleeding was compared in both groups.

Results: The mean age of all study participants was 44.6 + 13.5 years. The majority of the patients were females (89%). The mean body mass index (BMI) of all participants was 25.3 ± 3.09 kg/m2. Intraoperative bleeding was secured in 86.2% of patients in Group A vs. 81.7% of patients in Group B. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.356). In 27 (12.4%) cases, bleeding could not be controlled by both of these techniques. In these cases, endosuturing was applied in 19 (70.4%) cases, spongostan in 6 (22.2%) cases, and endo-clips in 2 (7.4%) cases. Intraoperative drain and conversion to open procedure was required in 1 patient each, both belonging to the direct pressure application group.

Conclusion: The efficacy of electrocoagulation in securing haemorrhage from the liver bed is better than the direct pressure application technique.

Key words: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Haemorrhage, Electrocoagulation, Surgical hemostasis, Liver bed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电凝与直接压敷对腹腔镜胆囊切除术肝床出血的影响。
目的:比较电凝与直接压敷在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中控制肝床出血的效果。研究设计:随机对照试验。研究地点和时间:2021年7月至2021年12月,巴基斯坦拉合尔Ganga Ram爵士医院普通外科。方法:将18 ~ 60岁的腹腔镜胆囊切除术肝床出血患者218例随机分为两组止血技术。A组采用电凝治疗,B组直接按压出血部位5分钟。比较两组患者控制出血的效果。结果:所有研究参与者的平均年龄为44.6 + 13.5岁。大多数患者为女性(89%)。所有参与者的平均体重指数(BMI)为25.3±3.09 kg/m2。A组术中出血发生率为86.2%,b组为81.7%,但差异无统计学意义(p=0.356)。在27例(12.4%)病例中,两种方法均不能控制出血。在这些病例中,19例(70.4%)采用了内缝合,6例(22.2%)采用了海绵,2例(7.4%)采用了内夹。术中引流转开腹各1例,均属于直接加压组。结论:电凝固定肝床出血的效果优于直接压敷术。关键词:腹腔镜胆囊切除术,出血,电凝,手术止血,肝床
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
453
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (JCPSP), is the prestigious, peer reviewed monthly biomedical journal of the country published regularly since 1991. Established with the primary aim of promotion and dissemination of medical research and contributed by scholars of biomedical sciences from Pakistan and abroad, it carries original research papers, , case reports, review articles, articles on medical education, commentaries, short communication, new technology, editorials and letters to the editor. It covers the core biomedical health science subjects, basic medical sciences and emerging community problems, prepared in accordance with the “Uniform requirements for submission to bio-medical journals” laid down by International Committee of Medical Journals Editors (ICMJE). All publications of JCPSP are peer reviewed by subject specialists from Pakistan and locally and abroad.
期刊最新文献
Changes in Corneal Biomechanical Properties after Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy in Myopia. Efficacy of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Modification in Preventing Ventilator-associated Pneumonia. Comparison of Rapid Antigen Detection Test with Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction in Highly Suspected COVID-19 Patients. Cervical Mediastinoscopy as a Diagnostic Tool for Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy. Proposing Development of Community-based Physical Activity Park for Elderly Population of Pakistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1