[The Programme 13-Novembre between individual memory and collective memory].

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Biologie Aujourd''hui Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1051/jbio/2023016
Francis Eustache, Denis Peschanski
{"title":"[The Programme 13-Novembre between individual memory and collective memory].","authors":"Francis Eustache,&nbsp;Denis Peschanski","doi":"10.1051/jbio/2023016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this article is to present the evolution of scientific work on human memory from the end of the 19th century. The work of experimental psychology and neuropsychology first dominated the scientific scene. Research in the humanities and social sciences was established in the interwar period, but without any real interaction with psychology and neurosciences. We recall the most emblematic historical works of two distinct visions of memory: those of the experimental psychologist Hermann Ebbinghaus who measured memory, on himself, from lists of meaningless syllables, and those of the sociologist Maurice Halbwachs for whom any act of memory is a social act. This disciplinary closure persisted until the end of the 20th century. A real social shift has taken place since the 2000s, with a desire to studying and understanding the interactions between individual and collective memories. In this article, the authors argue for the emergence of \"sciences of memory\" based on dialectic and transdisciplinarity. They draw on the Programme 13-Novembre that is emblematic of this evolution. The Programme 13-Novembre has seized upon a diversity of research tools on memory by applying them to a traumatic event in French society: the attacks of 13 November 2015 in Paris and its immediate suburbs. Its genesis, its overall architecture and several of its components are presented here, as well as a few results already published. In addition to its theoretical scope, this work has many possible applications, particularly in the understanding and management of various pathologies, post-traumatic stress disorder being the most demonstrative in this respect.</p>","PeriodicalId":39068,"journal":{"name":"Biologie Aujourd''hui","volume":"217 1-2","pages":"39-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biologie Aujourd''hui","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/jbio/2023016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present the evolution of scientific work on human memory from the end of the 19th century. The work of experimental psychology and neuropsychology first dominated the scientific scene. Research in the humanities and social sciences was established in the interwar period, but without any real interaction with psychology and neurosciences. We recall the most emblematic historical works of two distinct visions of memory: those of the experimental psychologist Hermann Ebbinghaus who measured memory, on himself, from lists of meaningless syllables, and those of the sociologist Maurice Halbwachs for whom any act of memory is a social act. This disciplinary closure persisted until the end of the 20th century. A real social shift has taken place since the 2000s, with a desire to studying and understanding the interactions between individual and collective memories. In this article, the authors argue for the emergence of "sciences of memory" based on dialectic and transdisciplinarity. They draw on the Programme 13-Novembre that is emblematic of this evolution. The Programme 13-Novembre has seized upon a diversity of research tools on memory by applying them to a traumatic event in French society: the attacks of 13 November 2015 in Paris and its immediate suburbs. Its genesis, its overall architecture and several of its components are presented here, as well as a few results already published. In addition to its theoretical scope, this work has many possible applications, particularly in the understanding and management of various pathologies, post-traumatic stress disorder being the most demonstrative in this respect.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[11月13日关于个人记忆与集体记忆的方案]。
本文的目的是介绍自19世纪末以来人类记忆科学工作的演变。实验心理学和神经心理学的工作首先在科学界占据主导地位。人文和社会科学的研究是在两次世界大战之间建立起来的,但与心理学和神经科学没有任何真正的互动。我们回想起两种截然不同的记忆观的最具象征意义的历史著作:实验心理学家赫尔曼·艾宾浩斯(Hermann Ebbinghaus)的作品,他自己从无意义的音节列表中测量记忆;社会学家莫里斯·哈布瓦克斯(Maurice Halbwachs)的作品,他认为任何记忆行为都是一种社会行为。这种纪律封闭一直持续到20世纪末。自2000年代以来,真正的社会转变发生了,人们渴望研究和理解个人和集体记忆之间的相互作用。在这篇文章中,作者主张在辩证和跨学科的基础上出现“记忆科学”。它们借鉴了象征这一演变的11月13日方案。“11月13日计划”利用多种记忆研究工具,将其应用于法国社会的创伤性事件:2015年11月13日在巴黎及其近郊发生的袭击事件。本文介绍了它的起源、总体架构和几个组成部分,以及一些已经发表的结果。除了它的理论范围,这项工作有许多可能的应用,特别是在各种病理的理解和管理,创伤后应激障碍在这方面是最具示范性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biologie Aujourd''hui
Biologie Aujourd''hui Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
[Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antigens (ANCA)-associated vasculitis: Current therapeutics]. [IL-17A and IL-17F: from discovery to target of biologics - an illustrative example of translational research]. [Phytoplankton population dynamics along the Casablanca - El Jadida Atlantic coast]. [Protecting biodiversity and sustainable sciences]. [Protein induced proximity and targeted degradations by new degraders: concepts, developments, challenges for clinical applications].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1