A novel prenatal index predicting the probability of neonatal intensive care in pregnants: amnion progesterone receptor to alfa fetoprotein rate.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Ginekologia polska Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-10 DOI:10.5603/GP.a2023.0046
Seyma Banu Arslanca, Tolga Ecemis, Ozgur Sahin, Sevgi Ayhan, Tufan Arslanca, Gamze Sinem Yucel
{"title":"A novel prenatal index predicting the probability of neonatal intensive care in pregnants: amnion progesterone receptor to alfa fetoprotein rate.","authors":"Seyma Banu Arslanca, Tolga Ecemis, Ozgur Sahin, Sevgi Ayhan, Tufan Arslanca, Gamze Sinem Yucel","doi":"10.5603/GP.a2023.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Amniocentesis (AC) is the most used interventional procedure for prenatal diagnosis. The study aims to evaluate the pregnancy outcomes undergoing AC and the potential of amnion progesterone receptor (aPR) to alfa fetoprotein (AFP) rate for predicting the probability of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective cross-sectional study population consisted of 85 pregnant women who underwent mid-trimester AC. All cases were screened by ultrasound before AC. Maternal venous and amniotic samples were obtained simultaneously to evaluate the serum progesterone (sPRG), aPR, and aAFP and analyzed with patient results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unlike sPRG and aAFP, aPR showed a positive correlation with NICU and a negative correlation with parity. In linear regression, the aPR-AFP rate showed strong linearity with NICU and parity. In an aPR-AFP rate analysis, we saw a strong predictivity for NICU compared to the other three parameters. It presented 73.4% specificity and 79% sensitivity at 0.0075 cut-off (AUC: 0.78; p = 0.003; 95% CI: 0.608-0.914).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluating the PR either alone or in a rational combination with AFP will provide physicians with valuable information about the advanced process of pregnancy and postpartum complications. The physicians might use the aPR-AFP rate to predict NICU potential for pregnancy and need further studies to make more vital predictions on postpartum complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12727,"journal":{"name":"Ginekologia polska","volume":" ","pages":"727-732"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ginekologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2023.0046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Amniocentesis (AC) is the most used interventional procedure for prenatal diagnosis. The study aims to evaluate the pregnancy outcomes undergoing AC and the potential of amnion progesterone receptor (aPR) to alfa fetoprotein (AFP) rate for predicting the probability of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Material and methods: This prospective cross-sectional study population consisted of 85 pregnant women who underwent mid-trimester AC. All cases were screened by ultrasound before AC. Maternal venous and amniotic samples were obtained simultaneously to evaluate the serum progesterone (sPRG), aPR, and aAFP and analyzed with patient results.

Results: Unlike sPRG and aAFP, aPR showed a positive correlation with NICU and a negative correlation with parity. In linear regression, the aPR-AFP rate showed strong linearity with NICU and parity. In an aPR-AFP rate analysis, we saw a strong predictivity for NICU compared to the other three parameters. It presented 73.4% specificity and 79% sensitivity at 0.0075 cut-off (AUC: 0.78; p = 0.003; 95% CI: 0.608-0.914).

Conclusions: Evaluating the PR either alone or in a rational combination with AFP will provide physicians with valuable information about the advanced process of pregnancy and postpartum complications. The physicians might use the aPR-AFP rate to predict NICU potential for pregnancy and need further studies to make more vital predictions on postpartum complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测孕妇接受新生儿重症监护概率的新型产前指数:羊膜孕酮受体与甲胎蛋白比率。
简介羊膜腔穿刺术(AC)是产前诊断中最常用的介入手术。本研究旨在评估羊膜腔穿刺术的妊娠结局,以及羊膜孕酮受体(aPR)与甲胎蛋白(AFP)比值预测新生儿重症监护室(NICU)概率的潜力:这项前瞻性横断面研究的研究对象包括85名接受孕中期剖宫产术的孕妇。所有病例均在剖宫产前进行了超声筛查。同时采集孕妇静脉和羊水样本,评估血清孕酮(sPRG)、aPR和aAFP,并与患者结果进行分析:与 sPRG 和 aAFP 不同,aPR 与新生儿重症监护室呈正相关,与胎次呈负相关。在线性回归中,aPR-AFP 率与新生儿重症监护室和奇偶数呈很强的线性关系。在 aPR-AFP 率分析中,与其他三个参数相比,我们发现其对新生儿重症监护室有很强的预测性。在 0.0075 临界值时,其特异性为 73.4%,灵敏度为 79%(AUC:0.78;P = 0.003;95% CI:0.608-0.914):结论:单独评估 PR 或将 PR 与甲胎蛋白(AFP)合理结合进行评估,可为医生提供有关妊娠晚期和产后并发症的宝贵信息。医生可以使用 aPR-AFP 比率来预测妊娠的新生儿重症监护室潜力,但还需要进一步的研究来对产后并发症做出更重要的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ginekologia polska
Ginekologia polska OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Ginekologia Polska’ is a monthly medical journal published in Polish and English language. ‘Ginekologia Polska’ will accept submissions relating to any aspect of gynaecology, obstetrics and areas directly related. ‘Ginekologia Polska’ publishes original contributions, comparative works, case studies, letters to the editor and many other categories of articles.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between gestational weight gain during different phases and maternal complications or neonatal outcomes. The effect of interdisciplinary and diversified health education combined with personalized nutrition intervention on FPG, 2hPG, SDS, SAS scores and the pregnancy outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus. Apical defect - the essence of cystocele pathogenesis? Smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP): a case-based analysis. ICTP concentration in cervical-vaginal fluid as a potential marker of membrane collagen degradation before labor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1