Susceptibility of fluorotic enamel to dental erosion-abrasion.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry Brazilian Oral Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0068
Cristiane Araújo Maia Silva, Frederico Barbosa de Sousa, Esperanza Angeles Martinez-Mier, Adam Benjamin Kelly, George J Eckert, Anderson Takeo Hara
{"title":"Susceptibility of fluorotic enamel to dental erosion-abrasion.","authors":"Cristiane Araújo Maia Silva,&nbsp;Frederico Barbosa de Sousa,&nbsp;Esperanza Angeles Martinez-Mier,&nbsp;Adam Benjamin Kelly,&nbsp;George J Eckert,&nbsp;Anderson Takeo Hara","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dental hard tissue conditions can be of pre- or post-eruptive nature, such as enamel fluorosis and erosive tooth wear (ETW), respectively. Dental enamel fluorosis is caused by the chronic and excessive intake of fluoride during enamel development, leading to increased fluoride concentration and increased porosity. ETW has become a common clinical condition and often impairs dental function and aesthetics. This in vitro study tested the hypothesis that fluorotic enamel presents different susceptibility to dental erosion-abrasion. It consisted of a 3×3×2 factorial design, considering a) fluorosis severity: sound (TF0), mild (TF1-2), moderate (TF3-4); b) abrasive challenge: low, medium, and high; and c) erosive challenge: yes or no. A total of 144 human teeth were selected according to the three fluorosis severity levels (n=48), and subdivided into six groups (n = 8) generated by the association of the different erosive and abrasive challenges. Enamel blocks (4×4 mm) were prepared from each tooth and their natural enamel surfaces subjected to an erosion-abrasion cycling model. After cycling, the depth of the lesions in enamel was assessed by profilometry. ANOVA showed that the three-way and two-way interactions among the factors were not significant (p > 0.20). Enamel fluorosis level (p=0.638) and abrasion level (p = 0.390) had no significant effect on lesion depth. Acid exposure caused significantly more enamel surface loss than water (p < 0.001). Considering the limitations of this in vitro study, fluorosis did not affect the susceptibility of enamel to dental erosion-abrasion.</p>","PeriodicalId":48942,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Oral Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dental hard tissue conditions can be of pre- or post-eruptive nature, such as enamel fluorosis and erosive tooth wear (ETW), respectively. Dental enamel fluorosis is caused by the chronic and excessive intake of fluoride during enamel development, leading to increased fluoride concentration and increased porosity. ETW has become a common clinical condition and often impairs dental function and aesthetics. This in vitro study tested the hypothesis that fluorotic enamel presents different susceptibility to dental erosion-abrasion. It consisted of a 3×3×2 factorial design, considering a) fluorosis severity: sound (TF0), mild (TF1-2), moderate (TF3-4); b) abrasive challenge: low, medium, and high; and c) erosive challenge: yes or no. A total of 144 human teeth were selected according to the three fluorosis severity levels (n=48), and subdivided into six groups (n = 8) generated by the association of the different erosive and abrasive challenges. Enamel blocks (4×4 mm) were prepared from each tooth and their natural enamel surfaces subjected to an erosion-abrasion cycling model. After cycling, the depth of the lesions in enamel was assessed by profilometry. ANOVA showed that the three-way and two-way interactions among the factors were not significant (p > 0.20). Enamel fluorosis level (p=0.638) and abrasion level (p = 0.390) had no significant effect on lesion depth. Acid exposure caused significantly more enamel surface loss than water (p < 0.001). Considering the limitations of this in vitro study, fluorosis did not affect the susceptibility of enamel to dental erosion-abrasion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
含氟牙釉质对牙齿侵蚀磨损的敏感性。
牙齿硬组织状况可以是爆发前或爆发后的性质,如氟牙釉质中毒和侵蚀性牙齿磨损(ETW)分别。牙釉质氟中毒是由于牙釉质发育过程中长期过量摄入氟化物,导致氟化物浓度升高,孔隙度增加所致。ETW已成为一种常见的临床疾病,经常损害牙齿功能和美观。本体外实验验证了含氟牙釉质对牙齿侵蚀磨损的不同敏感性。该研究采用3×3×2因子设计,考虑a)氟中毒严重程度:重度(TF0)、轻度(TF1-2)、中度(TF3-4);B)磨料难度:低、中、高;c)侵蚀性挑战:是或否。根据氟中毒的3种严重程度(n=48)选取144颗人牙,并根据不同的侵蚀和磨蚀挑战再细分为6组(n= 8)。牙釉质块(4×4 mm)从每颗牙齿及其天然牙釉质表面制备,并进行侵蚀-磨损循环模型。循环后,用轮廓术评估牙釉质损伤深度。方差分析显示,各因素之间的三向和双向交互作用均不显著(p > 0.20)。氟斑牙程度(p=0.638)和磨损程度(p= 0.390)对损伤深度无显著影响。酸暴露导致的牙釉质表面损失明显多于水(p < 0.001)。考虑到本体外研究的局限性,氟中毒不影响牙釉质对牙齿侵蚀磨损的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Oral Research
Brazilian Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Virtual learning object about oral ulcerative lesions: controlled educational intervention study. Braz. Oral Res. 2023:37:e118. Comparative study of sex estimates in adult skulls using direct measurement and tomographic image reconstruction. Braz Oral Res. 2023;37:e064. Association among COVID-19, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and oral health status. Braz Oral Res. 2023;37:e072. Evaluation of peripheral nerve fibers and mast cells in burning mouth syndrome. Erratum: Evaluation of the expression of nerve fiber markers in healthy and inflamed dental pulp. Braz Oral Res. 2023;37:e020.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1