A qualitative investigation of paediatric intensive care staff attitudes towards the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection in the molecular diagnostics era.

John A Clark, Andrew Conway Morris, Constantinos Kanaris, David Inwald, Warwick Butt, Joshua Osowicki, Luregn J Schlapbach, Martin D Curran, Deborah White, Esther Daubney, Shruti Agrawal, Vilas Navapurkar, M Estée Török, Stephen Baker, Nazima Pathan
{"title":"A qualitative investigation of paediatric intensive care staff attitudes towards the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection in the molecular diagnostics era.","authors":"John A Clark, Andrew Conway Morris, Constantinos Kanaris, David Inwald, Warwick Butt, Joshua Osowicki, Luregn J Schlapbach, Martin D Curran, Deborah White, Esther Daubney, Shruti Agrawal, Vilas Navapurkar, M Estée Török, Stephen Baker, Nazima Pathan","doi":"10.1007/s44253-023-00008-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the past decade, molecular diagnostic syndromic arrays incorporating a range of bacterial and viral pathogens have been described. It is unclear how paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) staff diagnose lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) and integrate diagnostic array results into antimicrobial decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey with eleven questions was distributed throughout paediatric intensive care societies in the UK, continental Europe and Australasia with a total of 755 members. Participants were asked to rate the clinical factors and investigations they used when prescribing for LRTI. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with staff who participated in a single-centre observational study of a 52-pathogen diagnostic array.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two survey responses were received; most responses were from senior doctors. Whilst diagnostic arrays were used less frequently than routine investigations (i.e. microbiological culture), they were of comparable perceived utility when making antimicrobial decisions. Prescribers reported that for arrays to be clinically impactful, they would need to deliver results within 6 h for stable patients and within 1 h for unstable patients to inform their immediate decision to prescribe antimicrobials. From 16 staff interviews, we identified that arrays were helpful for the diagnosis and screening of bacterial LRTI. Staff reported it could be challenging to interpret results in some cases due to the high sensitivity of the test. Therefore, results were considered within the context of the patient and discussed within the multidisciplinary team.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diagnostic arrays were considered of comparable value to microbiological investigations by PICU prescribers. Our findings support the need for further clinical and economic evaluation of diagnostic arrays in a randomised control trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04233268. Registered on 18 January 2020.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44253-023-00008-z.</p>","PeriodicalId":73402,"journal":{"name":"Intensive care medicine. Paediatric and neonatal","volume":"1 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive care medicine. Paediatric and neonatal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44253-023-00008-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the past decade, molecular diagnostic syndromic arrays incorporating a range of bacterial and viral pathogens have been described. It is unclear how paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) staff diagnose lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) and integrate diagnostic array results into antimicrobial decision-making.

Methods: An online survey with eleven questions was distributed throughout paediatric intensive care societies in the UK, continental Europe and Australasia with a total of 755 members. Participants were asked to rate the clinical factors and investigations they used when prescribing for LRTI. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with staff who participated in a single-centre observational study of a 52-pathogen diagnostic array.

Results: Seventy-two survey responses were received; most responses were from senior doctors. Whilst diagnostic arrays were used less frequently than routine investigations (i.e. microbiological culture), they were of comparable perceived utility when making antimicrobial decisions. Prescribers reported that for arrays to be clinically impactful, they would need to deliver results within 6 h for stable patients and within 1 h for unstable patients to inform their immediate decision to prescribe antimicrobials. From 16 staff interviews, we identified that arrays were helpful for the diagnosis and screening of bacterial LRTI. Staff reported it could be challenging to interpret results in some cases due to the high sensitivity of the test. Therefore, results were considered within the context of the patient and discussed within the multidisciplinary team.

Conclusions: Diagnostic arrays were considered of comparable value to microbiological investigations by PICU prescribers. Our findings support the need for further clinical and economic evaluation of diagnostic arrays in a randomised control trial.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04233268. Registered on 18 January 2020.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44253-023-00008-z.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分子诊断时代儿科重症监护人员对下呼吸道感染诊断态度的定性调查。
背景:在过去的十年里,已经描述了包含一系列细菌和病毒病原体的分子诊断综合征阵列。目前尚不清楚儿科重症监护室(PICU)工作人员如何诊断下呼吸道感染(LRTI),并将诊断阵列结果纳入抗菌决策。方法:一项包含11个问题的在线调查在英国、欧洲大陆和澳大拉西亚的儿科重症监护学会中进行,共有755名成员。参与者被要求对他们在开具LRTI处方时使用的临床因素和调查进行评分。对参与52种病原体诊断阵列的单中心观察性研究的工作人员进行了半结构化访谈。结果:收到72份调查答复;大多数回复来自资深医生。虽然诊断阵列的使用频率低于常规调查(即微生物培养),但在做出抗菌决策时,它们具有相当的感知效用。处方医生报告说,为了使阵列具有临床影响力,他们需要在6小时内为稳定患者和1小时内为不稳定患者提供结果,以告知他们立即决定开抗微生物药物。从16名员工的访谈中,我们发现阵列有助于细菌LRTI的诊断和筛查。工作人员报告说,由于测试的高灵敏度,在某些情况下解释结果可能很有挑战性。因此,在患者的背景下考虑结果,并在多学科团队中进行讨论。结论:诊断阵列被认为与PICU处方医生的微生物调查具有同等价值。我们的研究结果支持了在随机对照试验中对诊断阵列进行进一步临床和经济评估的必要性。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT04233268。注册日期:2020年1月18日。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1007/s44253-023-00008-z。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High-flow nasal oxygen in infants and children for early respiratory management of pneumonia-induced acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: the CENTURI randomized clinical trial Safety of primary nasotracheal intubation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Evaluating associations between late intensive care admission and mortality, intensive care days, and organ dysfunctions: a secondary analysis of data from the EPOCH cluster randomized trial Distribution and trajectory of vital signs from high-frequency continuous monitoring during pediatric critical care transport Inflammatory and coagulant responses after acute respiratory failure in children of different body habitus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1