Defibrillation Threshold Testing for Right-sided Device Implants: A Review to Inform Shared Decision-making, in Association with the British Heart Rhythm Society.

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.15420/aer.2022.38
Michael Tb Pope, John R Paisey, Paul R Roberts
{"title":"Defibrillation Threshold Testing for Right-sided Device Implants: A Review to Inform Shared Decision-making, in Association with the British Heart Rhythm Society.","authors":"Michael Tb Pope, John R Paisey, Paul R Roberts","doi":"10.15420/aer.2022.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prevention of sudden death using ICDs requires the reliable delivery of a high-energy shock to successfully terminate VF. Until more recently, the device implant procedure included conducting defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing involving VF induction and shock delivery to ensure efficacy. Large clinical trials, including SIMPLE and NORDIC ICD, have subsequently demonstrated that this is unnecessary, with a practice of omitting DFT testing having no impact on subsequent clinical outcomes. However, these studies specifically excluded patients requiring devices implanted on the right side, in whom the shock vector is significantly different and smaller studies suggest a higher DFT. In this review, the data regarding the use of DFT testing, focusing on right-sided implants, and the results of a survey of current UK practice are presented. In addition, a strategy of shared decision-making when it comes to deciding on the use of DFT testing during right-sided ICD implant procedures is proposed.","PeriodicalId":8412,"journal":{"name":"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review","volume":"12 ","pages":"e10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a3/0d/aer-12-e10.PMC10326664.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2022.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Prevention of sudden death using ICDs requires the reliable delivery of a high-energy shock to successfully terminate VF. Until more recently, the device implant procedure included conducting defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing involving VF induction and shock delivery to ensure efficacy. Large clinical trials, including SIMPLE and NORDIC ICD, have subsequently demonstrated that this is unnecessary, with a practice of omitting DFT testing having no impact on subsequent clinical outcomes. However, these studies specifically excluded patients requiring devices implanted on the right side, in whom the shock vector is significantly different and smaller studies suggest a higher DFT. In this review, the data regarding the use of DFT testing, focusing on right-sided implants, and the results of a survey of current UK practice are presented. In addition, a strategy of shared decision-making when it comes to deciding on the use of DFT testing during right-sided ICD implant procedures is proposed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右侧装置植入的除颤阈值测试:与英国心律学会联合进行的一项综述,以告知共同决策。
使用icd预防猝死需要可靠的高能冲击来成功终止VF。直到最近,设备植入过程包括进行除颤阈值(DFT)测试,包括VF诱导和休克传递,以确保疗效。大型临床试验,包括SIMPLE和NORDIC ICD,随后证明这是不必要的,省略DFT测试的做法对随后的临床结果没有影响。然而,这些研究特别排除了需要在右侧植入装置的患者,这些患者的冲击矢量明显不同,较小的研究表明DFT更高。在这篇综述中,关于使用DFT测试的数据,重点是右侧植入物,以及目前英国实践的调查结果。此外,提出了在右侧ICD植入过程中决定使用DFT测试的共同决策策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association Between Atrial Fibrillation and Long-term Mortality in Acute MI Patients. Incidence, Risk Factors and Predictors of Phantom Shocks in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: State-of-the-art Review. Dynamic Voltage Mapping of the Post-infarct Ventricular Tachycardia Substrate: A Practical Technique to Help Differentiate Scar from Borderzone Tissue. Left Bundle Branch Block-associated Cardiomyopathy: A New Approach. Stylet-driven Leads or Lumenless Leads for Conduction System Pacing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1