Clinical and Radiographic Predictors of Successful Coronary Angiography Through Right Radial Artery Access.

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY Interventional Cardiology Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.15420/icr.2023.04
Sohil Elfar, Ahmed Onsy, Mohamed Amr Farouk
{"title":"Clinical and Radiographic Predictors of Successful Coronary Angiography Through Right Radial Artery Access.","authors":"Sohil Elfar,&nbsp;Ahmed Onsy,&nbsp;Mohamed Amr Farouk","doi":"10.15420/icr.2023.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: One of the limitations of the right radial access approach is complex vessel anatomy, such as subclavian tortuosity. Several clinical predictors have been proposed for tortuosities, such as older age, female sex and hypertension. In this study, we hypothesised that chest radiography would add predictive value to the traditional predictors. <b>Methods</b>: This prospective blinded study included patients who underwent transradial access coronary angiography. They were classified into four groups according to difficulty: Group I, Group II, Group III and Group IV. Different groups were compared according to clinical and radiographic characteristics. <b>Results</b>: The study included 108 patients (54, 27, 17 and 10 patients in Groups I, II, III and IV, respectively). The rate of crossover to transfemoral access was 9.26%. Age, hypertension and female sex were associated with a greater difficulty and failure rates. Regarding radiographic parameters, a higher failure rate was associated with a higher diameter of the aortic knuckle (Group IV, 4.09 ± 1.32 cm versus Groups I, II and III combined, 3.26 ± 0.98 cm; p=0.015) and the width of the mediastinum (Group IV, 8.96 ± 2.88 cm versus Groups I, II and III combined, 7.28 ± 1.78 cm; p=0.009). The cut-off value for prominent aortic knuckle was 3.55 cm (sensitivity 70% and specificity 67.35%) and the width of mediastinum was 6.59 cm (sensitivity 90% and specificity 42.86%). <b>Conclusion</b>: Radiographic prominent aortic knuckle and wide mediastinum are valuable clinical parameters and useful predictors for transradial access failure caused by tortuosity of the right subclavian/brachiocephalic arteries or aorta.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"18 ","pages":"e21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9d/6c/icr-18-e21.PMC10331560.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Cardiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2023.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the limitations of the right radial access approach is complex vessel anatomy, such as subclavian tortuosity. Several clinical predictors have been proposed for tortuosities, such as older age, female sex and hypertension. In this study, we hypothesised that chest radiography would add predictive value to the traditional predictors. Methods: This prospective blinded study included patients who underwent transradial access coronary angiography. They were classified into four groups according to difficulty: Group I, Group II, Group III and Group IV. Different groups were compared according to clinical and radiographic characteristics. Results: The study included 108 patients (54, 27, 17 and 10 patients in Groups I, II, III and IV, respectively). The rate of crossover to transfemoral access was 9.26%. Age, hypertension and female sex were associated with a greater difficulty and failure rates. Regarding radiographic parameters, a higher failure rate was associated with a higher diameter of the aortic knuckle (Group IV, 4.09 ± 1.32 cm versus Groups I, II and III combined, 3.26 ± 0.98 cm; p=0.015) and the width of the mediastinum (Group IV, 8.96 ± 2.88 cm versus Groups I, II and III combined, 7.28 ± 1.78 cm; p=0.009). The cut-off value for prominent aortic knuckle was 3.55 cm (sensitivity 70% and specificity 67.35%) and the width of mediastinum was 6.59 cm (sensitivity 90% and specificity 42.86%). Conclusion: Radiographic prominent aortic knuckle and wide mediastinum are valuable clinical parameters and useful predictors for transradial access failure caused by tortuosity of the right subclavian/brachiocephalic arteries or aorta.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过右桡动脉通道成功进行冠状动脉造影的临床和影像学预测因素。
背景:右桡骨入路的局限性之一是复杂的血管解剖,如锁骨下弯曲。已经提出了一些临床预测因素,如老年、女性和高血压。在这项研究中,我们假设胸部x线摄影可以增加传统预测指标的预测价值。方法:这项前瞻性盲法研究纳入了接受经桡动脉通道冠状动脉造影的患者。根据难易程度分为ⅰ组、ⅱ组、ⅲ组、ⅳ组,并根据临床及影像学特征进行比较。结果:纳入108例患者(I、II、III、IV组分别为54例、27例、17例、10例)。经股交叉通路率为9.26%。年龄、高血压和女性与更大的困难和失败率相关。关于x线参数,更高的失败率与更高的主动脉节直径相关(IV组,4.09±1.32 cm vs . I, II和III组联合,3.26±0.98 cm;p=0.015)和纵隔宽度(IV组为8.96±2.88 cm, I、II、III组合并为7.28±1.78 cm;p = 0.009)。主动脉节突出的截断值为3.55 cm(敏感性70%,特异性67.35%),纵隔宽度为6.59 cm(敏感性90%,特异性42.86%)。结论:主动脉关节突出和纵隔宽是诊断右侧锁骨下/头臂动脉或主动脉扭曲所致桡动脉通路失败的重要临床参数和预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Cardiology Review
Interventional Cardiology Review Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Wire Escalation And De-escalation Techniques in Antegrade and Retrograde Approaches to Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Training Culture Focus Group Position Statement: Bringing Trainees and Trainers Together. Atherectomy Techniques: Rotablation, Orbital and Laser. Outcomes and Complications of Mitral and Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-edge Repair. New-generation Leadless Pacemaker Implantation: First Procedures in Central Asia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1