Revisiting the World's Strictest COVID-19 Lockdown: Formidable Mental Health Challenges.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacopsychiatry Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2108-2164
Beier Guan, Ruihua Li, Chuanning Huang, Jiang Du, Min Zhao, Shuyan Liu
{"title":"Revisiting the World's Strictest COVID-19 Lockdown: Formidable Mental Health Challenges.","authors":"Beier Guan,&nbsp;Ruihua Li,&nbsp;Chuanning Huang,&nbsp;Jiang Du,&nbsp;Min Zhao,&nbsp;Shuyan Liu","doi":"10.1055/a-2108-2164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many nations have implemented lockdowns to prevent and minimize the spread of infections in healthcare settings. However, the impact of lockdown duration on mental health remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study using online questionnaires to assess the mental health status of the general population during the Shanghai lockdown period from March to May 2022. The mental health of the participants was evaluated by the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), in which a cut-off score of 12 or more indicated psychological distress. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the relationship between lockdown duration and mental health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2139 participants (mean age: 26.12 years, standard deviation: 6.37, 731 females; 1378 unmarried; 1099 Shanghai residents), approximately 47% reported psychological distress (GHQ-12≥12). Participants exposed to lockdown reported significantly higher GHQ-12 scores (11.93±6.81 vs. 8.73±6.35, <i>p</i><0.001). In our logistic regression model, participants who experienced the longest lockdown (43-61 days) had a significantly higher risk of psychological distress compared with those who did not (odds ratio: 3.10, 95% confidence interval: 2.06-4.70, <i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Lockdown duration significantly affects mental health, with longer lockdown duration being associated with worse mental health status. The relationship between lockdown and mental health should not be neglected in case of lockdown in response to future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":19783,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2108-2164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Many nations have implemented lockdowns to prevent and minimize the spread of infections in healthcare settings. However, the impact of lockdown duration on mental health remains controversial.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using online questionnaires to assess the mental health status of the general population during the Shanghai lockdown period from March to May 2022. The mental health of the participants was evaluated by the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), in which a cut-off score of 12 or more indicated psychological distress. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the relationship between lockdown duration and mental health.

Results: Among 2139 participants (mean age: 26.12 years, standard deviation: 6.37, 731 females; 1378 unmarried; 1099 Shanghai residents), approximately 47% reported psychological distress (GHQ-12≥12). Participants exposed to lockdown reported significantly higher GHQ-12 scores (11.93±6.81 vs. 8.73±6.35, p<0.001). In our logistic regression model, participants who experienced the longest lockdown (43-61 days) had a significantly higher risk of psychological distress compared with those who did not (odds ratio: 3.10, 95% confidence interval: 2.06-4.70, p<0.001).

Discussion: Lockdown duration significantly affects mental health, with longer lockdown duration being associated with worse mental health status. The relationship between lockdown and mental health should not be neglected in case of lockdown in response to future pandemics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重温世界上最严格的COVID-19封锁:艰巨的心理健康挑战。
导言:许多国家已经实施了封锁,以预防和尽量减少感染在医疗机构中的传播。然而,封锁时间对心理健康的影响仍然存在争议。方法:采用在线问卷调查的方法,对2022年3月至5月上海封城期间普通人群的心理健康状况进行回顾性研究。参与者的心理健康状况通过12项一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)进行评估,其中截止得分为12分或更高表示心理困扰。使用逻辑回归模型评估封锁时间与心理健康之间的关系。结果:在2139名参与者中(平均年龄:26.12岁,标准差:6.37),女性731名;1378年未婚;1099名上海居民),约47%报告心理困扰(GHQ-12≥12)。暴露于封城的参与者报告的GHQ-12得分显著较高(11.93±6.81比8.73±6.35)。讨论:封城持续时间显著影响心理健康,封城持续时间越长,心理健康状况越差。如果为应对未来的流行病而采取封锁措施,不应忽视封锁与心理健康之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacopsychiatry
Pharmacopsychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering advances in the fi eld of psychotropic drugs, Pharmaco psychiatry provides psychiatrists, neuroscientists and clinicians with key clinical insights and describes new avenues of research and treatment. The pharmacological and neurobiological bases of psychiatric disorders are discussed by presenting clinical and experimental research.
期刊最新文献
News on the Role of Antidepressants in and for COVID-19 and Long COVID. Monitoring Anesthetic Depth Using the Patient State Index in Electroconvulsive Therapy Improves Seizure Quality. Correction: Electroconvulsive Therapy Versus Aripiprazole Addition to Clozapine in Patients with Clozapine-Resistant Symptoms (EMECLO): A Protocol of a Single-Blind, Multicenter, Randomized-Controlled Feasibility Trial. Advancements in Non-Dopaminergic Treatments for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review of Pipeline Developments. Discontinuation Rate of Lurasidone and Quetiapine Extended Release in Bipolar Depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1