Design and Evaluation of an Interprofessional Preceptor Development Mini-Fellowship Program.

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-19 DOI:10.1097/CEH.0000000000000525
Sandro O Pinheiro, Sharron Rushton, Thomas R Konrad, Heather S McLean, Kathleen W Bartlett, Melinda Blazar, Susan T Hibbard, Jacqueline S Barnett
{"title":"Design and Evaluation of an Interprofessional Preceptor Development Mini-Fellowship Program.","authors":"Sandro O Pinheiro, Sharron Rushton, Thomas R Konrad, Heather S McLean, Kathleen W Bartlett, Melinda Blazar, Susan T Hibbard, Jacqueline S Barnett","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health professions preceptors require skills and knowledge to effectively meet the educational needs of interprofessional students in clinical environments. We implemented a mini-fellowship program to enhance the knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy of preceptors teaching students and applying quality improvement (QI) methods across disciplines and patient care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The design, implementation, and evaluation of the program were informed by the faculty development literature, principles of adult learning, and preceptor needs. The 3-day program included workshops on curriculum design, clinical teaching methods, QI, social determinants of health, cultural humility, and interprofessional teamwork. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods were used including preprogram and postprogram knowledge and self-efficacy surveys, along with end-of-session and program evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five annual cohorts involving 41 preceptors with varied demographics, professions, and clinical practices completed the mini-fellowship program. Participants' percentage of items answered correctly on a QI knowledge test increased from 79.2% (pretest) to 85.5% (post-test), a gain of 6.3% (90% CI: 2.9-9.7%; P < .003). The average QI self-efficacy scores improved from 2.64 to 3.82, a gain of 1.18 points on a five-point scale ( P < .001). The average education/teaching self-efficacy increased from 2.79 to 3.80 on a five-point scale ( P < .001). Ultimately, 94% would recommend the program to other preceptors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>An interprofessional preceptor development program designed to train clinicians to effectively teach in the clinical setting and to conduct QI projects with students was achievable and effective. This program can serve as a model for academic centers charged with training future health care workers and supporting their community-based preceptors' training needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"234-241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Health professions preceptors require skills and knowledge to effectively meet the educational needs of interprofessional students in clinical environments. We implemented a mini-fellowship program to enhance the knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy of preceptors teaching students and applying quality improvement (QI) methods across disciplines and patient care settings.

Methods: The design, implementation, and evaluation of the program were informed by the faculty development literature, principles of adult learning, and preceptor needs. The 3-day program included workshops on curriculum design, clinical teaching methods, QI, social determinants of health, cultural humility, and interprofessional teamwork. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods were used including preprogram and postprogram knowledge and self-efficacy surveys, along with end-of-session and program evaluations.

Results: Five annual cohorts involving 41 preceptors with varied demographics, professions, and clinical practices completed the mini-fellowship program. Participants' percentage of items answered correctly on a QI knowledge test increased from 79.2% (pretest) to 85.5% (post-test), a gain of 6.3% (90% CI: 2.9-9.7%; P < .003). The average QI self-efficacy scores improved from 2.64 to 3.82, a gain of 1.18 points on a five-point scale ( P < .001). The average education/teaching self-efficacy increased from 2.79 to 3.80 on a five-point scale ( P < .001). Ultimately, 94% would recommend the program to other preceptors.

Discussion: An interprofessional preceptor development program designed to train clinicians to effectively teach in the clinical setting and to conduct QI projects with students was achievable and effective. This program can serve as a model for academic centers charged with training future health care workers and supporting their community-based preceptors' training needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计和评估跨专业实习生发展小型奖学金计划。
导言:卫生专业的实习医生需要掌握一定的技能和知识,才能在临床环境中有效地满足跨专业学生的教育需求。我们实施了一项小型研究金计划,以提高传授学生知识、技能和自我效能,并在不同学科和病人护理环境中应用质量改进(QI)方法:方法:该计划的设计、实施和评估参考了教师发展文献、成人学习原则和实习医生的需求。为期 3 天的项目包括有关课程设计、临床教学方法、质量改进、健康的社会决定因素、文化谦逊和跨专业团队合作的研讨会。采用了定量和定性评估方法,包括课程前和课程后的知识和自我效能调查,以及课程结束和课程评估:共有 41 名来自不同人口统计学、专业和临床实践领域的戒酒师参加了小型研究金项目。参加者在QI知识测试中答对题目的百分比从79.2%(测试前)提高到85.5%(测试后),提高了6.3% (90% CI: 2.9-9.7%; P < .003)。质量改进自我效能感的平均得分从 2.64 分提高到 3.82 分,在五分制中提高了 1.18 分(P < .001)。教育/教学自我效能感的平均分从 2.79 分提高到 3.80 分(5 分制)(P < .001)。最终,94%的人会向其他实习医生推荐该项目:讨论:旨在培训临床医生在临床环境中有效教学并与学生一起开展质量改进项目的跨专业预科医师发展项目是可行且有效的。该项目可作为负责培训未来医护人员和支持社区戒酒师培训需求的学术中心的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
期刊最新文献
Differences in Physician Performance and Self-rated Confidence on High- and Low-Stakes Knowledge Assessments in Board Certification. Paving the Way Forward for Evidence-Based Continuing Professional Development. Development of a Communication Skills Training to Enhance Effective Team Communication in Oncology. Evolution of a Continuing Professional Development Program Based on a Community of Practice Model for Health Care Professionals in Resource-Limited Settings. Where do Physiotherapists Search for Information? Barriers in Translating Scientific Information into Clinical Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1