The Effects of Intermittent Diet Breaks during 25% Energy Restriction on Body Composition and Resting Metabolic Rate in Resistance-Trained Females: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Human Kinetics Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.5114/jhk/159960
Madelin R Siedler, Megan H Lewis, Eric T Trexler, Priscila Lamadrid, Brian J Waddell, Sarah F Bishop, Gillian SanFilippo, Kaitlin Callahan, David Mathas, Gianna F Mastrofini, Menno Henselmans, Fredrik T Vårvik, Bill I Campbell
{"title":"The Effects of Intermittent Diet Breaks during 25% Energy Restriction on Body Composition and Resting Metabolic Rate in Resistance-Trained Females: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Madelin R Siedler,&nbsp;Megan H Lewis,&nbsp;Eric T Trexler,&nbsp;Priscila Lamadrid,&nbsp;Brian J Waddell,&nbsp;Sarah F Bishop,&nbsp;Gillian SanFilippo,&nbsp;Kaitlin Callahan,&nbsp;David Mathas,&nbsp;Gianna F Mastrofini,&nbsp;Menno Henselmans,&nbsp;Fredrik T Vårvik,&nbsp;Bill I Campbell","doi":"10.5114/jhk/159960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of intermittent versus continuous energy restriction on body composition, resting metabolic rate, and eating behaviors in resistance-trained females. Thirty-eight resistance-trained females (mean ± standard deviation age: 22.3 ± 4.2 years) were randomized to receive either six weeks of a continuous 25% reduction in energy intake (n = 18), or one week of energy balance after every two weeks of 25% energy restriction (eight weeks total; n = 20). Participants were instructed to ingest 1.8 g protein/kilogram bodyweight per day and completed three weekly supervised resistance training sessions throughout the intervention. There were no differences between groups for changes over time in body composition, resting metabolic rate, or seven of the eight measured eating behavior variables (p > 0.05). However, a significant group-by-time interaction for disinhibition (p < 0.01) from the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire was observed, with values (± standard error) in the continuous group increasing from 4.91 ± 0.73 to 6.17 ± 0.71, while values in the intermittent group decreased from 6.80 ± 0.68 to 6.05 ± 0.68. Thus, diet breaks do not appear to induce improvements in body composition or metabolic rate in comparison with continuous energy restriction over six weeks of dieting, but may be employed for those who desire a short-term break from an energy-restricted diet without fear of fat regain. While diet breaks may reduce the impact of prolonged energy restriction on measures of disinhibition, they also require a longer time period that may be less appealing for some individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":16055,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Kinetics","volume":"86 ","pages":"117-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170537/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Kinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/159960","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of intermittent versus continuous energy restriction on body composition, resting metabolic rate, and eating behaviors in resistance-trained females. Thirty-eight resistance-trained females (mean ± standard deviation age: 22.3 ± 4.2 years) were randomized to receive either six weeks of a continuous 25% reduction in energy intake (n = 18), or one week of energy balance after every two weeks of 25% energy restriction (eight weeks total; n = 20). Participants were instructed to ingest 1.8 g protein/kilogram bodyweight per day and completed three weekly supervised resistance training sessions throughout the intervention. There were no differences between groups for changes over time in body composition, resting metabolic rate, or seven of the eight measured eating behavior variables (p > 0.05). However, a significant group-by-time interaction for disinhibition (p < 0.01) from the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire was observed, with values (± standard error) in the continuous group increasing from 4.91 ± 0.73 to 6.17 ± 0.71, while values in the intermittent group decreased from 6.80 ± 0.68 to 6.05 ± 0.68. Thus, diet breaks do not appear to induce improvements in body composition or metabolic rate in comparison with continuous energy restriction over six weeks of dieting, but may be employed for those who desire a short-term break from an energy-restricted diet without fear of fat regain. While diet breaks may reduce the impact of prolonged energy restriction on measures of disinhibition, they also require a longer time period that may be less appealing for some individuals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
25%能量限制期间间歇性饮食中断对阻力训练女性身体成分和静息代谢率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
本研究的目的是研究间歇性和连续能量限制对抗阻训练女性身体成分、静息代谢率和饮食行为的影响。38名接受阻力训练的女性(平均±标准差年龄:22.3±4.2岁)随机分为两组,一组连续减少25%的能量摄入6周(n = 18),另一组在每两周减少25%的能量摄入后进行一周的能量平衡(总共8周;N = 20)。参与者被要求每天摄入每公斤体重1.8克蛋白质,并在整个干预过程中每周完成三次有监督的阻力训练。各组之间的身体组成、静息代谢率或8个测量饮食行为变量中的7个变量随时间的变化没有差异(p > 0.05)。然而,三因素进食问卷在解除抑制方面存在显著的组间相互作用(p < 0.01),连续进食组的值(±标准误差)从4.91±0.73增加到6.17±0.71,而间歇进食组的值从6.80±0.68下降到6.05±0.68。因此,与连续六周的能量限制相比,中断饮食似乎并没有引起身体成分或代谢率的改善,但对于那些希望从能量限制饮食中短暂休息而又不担心脂肪重新增加的人来说,这可能是有效的。虽然中断饮食可能会减少长时间限制能量对解除抑制的影响,但它们也需要更长的时间,这对某些人来说可能不那么有吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Kinetics
Journal of Human Kinetics 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Kinetics is an open access interdisciplinary periodical offering the latest research in the science of human movement studies. This comprehensive professional journal features articles and research notes encompassing such topic areas as: Kinesiology, Exercise Physiology and Nutrition, Sports Training and Behavioural Sciences in Sport, but especially considering elite and competitive aspects of sport. The journal publishes original papers, invited reviews, short communications and letters to the Editors. Manuscripts submitted to the journal must contain novel data on theoretical or experimental research or on practical applications in the field of sport sciences. The Journal of Human Kinetics is published in March, June, September and December. We encourage scientists from around the world to submit their papers to our periodical.
期刊最新文献
Habitual Running Style Matters: Duty Factor, and Not Stride Frequency, Relates to Loading Magnitude. Impact of the TTN C > T Polymorphism on Selected Variables of Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity after a 12-Week Training Program. Increasing Braking and Amortization Forces during the Countermovement Jump Does Not Necessarily Improve Jump Height. Poor Joint Work in the Lower Limbs during a Tennis Forehand Groundstroke after a Cross-Over Step Inhibits an Increase in the Racket Speed. The Effect of Protective Mat Thickness on the Upper Limb Strike Force Simulation in Combat Sports and Self Defense.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1