Feasibility and Acceptability of a Novel Intensive Care Unit Communication Intervention ("Let's Talk") and Initial Assessment Using the Multiple Goals Theory of Communication.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-12 DOI:10.1177/10499091231176296
Lauren J Van Scoy, Allison M Scott, Jacob Higgins, Emily Wasserman, Daren Heyland, Vernon Chinchilli, Michael J Green
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of a Novel Intensive Care Unit Communication Intervention (\"Let's Talk\") and Initial Assessment Using the Multiple Goals Theory of Communication.","authors":"Lauren J Van Scoy, Allison M Scott, Jacob Higgins, Emily Wasserman, Daren Heyland, Vernon Chinchilli, Michael J Green","doi":"10.1177/10499091231176296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Family members of intensive care unit (ICU) patients often report poor communication, feeling unprepared for ICU family meetings, and poor psychological outcomes after decision-making. The objective of this study was to create a tool to prepare families for ICU family meetings and assess feasibility of using Communication Quality Analysis (CQA) to measure communication quality of family meetings. <b>Methods:</b> This observational study was conducted at an academic tertiary care center in Hershey, PA from March 2019 to 2020. Phase 1a involved conceptual design. Phase 1b entailed acceptability testing of 2 versions of the tool (text-only, comic) with 9 family members of non-capacitated ICU patients; thematic analysis of semi-strucutred interviews was conducted. Phase 1c assessed feasibility of applying CQA to audio-recorded ICU family meetings (n = 17); 3 analysts used CQA to assess 6 domains of communication quality. Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests were used to interpret CQA scores. <b>Results:</b> Four themes emerged from Phase 1b interviews: participants 1) found the tool useful for meeting preparation and organizing thoughts, 2) appreciated emotional content, 3) preferred the comic form (67%), and 4) had indifferent or negative perceptions about specific elements. In Phase 1c, clinicians scored higher on the CQA content and engagement domains; family members scored higher on the emotion domain. CQA scores in the relationship and face domains had the lowest quality ratings. <b>Conclusions:</b> <i>Let's Talk</i> may help families become better prepared for ICU family meetings. CQA provides a feasible approach to assessing communication quality that identifies specific areas of strengths and weaknesses in communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"373-382"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10885768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231176296","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family members of intensive care unit (ICU) patients often report poor communication, feeling unprepared for ICU family meetings, and poor psychological outcomes after decision-making. The objective of this study was to create a tool to prepare families for ICU family meetings and assess feasibility of using Communication Quality Analysis (CQA) to measure communication quality of family meetings. Methods: This observational study was conducted at an academic tertiary care center in Hershey, PA from March 2019 to 2020. Phase 1a involved conceptual design. Phase 1b entailed acceptability testing of 2 versions of the tool (text-only, comic) with 9 family members of non-capacitated ICU patients; thematic analysis of semi-strucutred interviews was conducted. Phase 1c assessed feasibility of applying CQA to audio-recorded ICU family meetings (n = 17); 3 analysts used CQA to assess 6 domains of communication quality. Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests were used to interpret CQA scores. Results: Four themes emerged from Phase 1b interviews: participants 1) found the tool useful for meeting preparation and organizing thoughts, 2) appreciated emotional content, 3) preferred the comic form (67%), and 4) had indifferent or negative perceptions about specific elements. In Phase 1c, clinicians scored higher on the CQA content and engagement domains; family members scored higher on the emotion domain. CQA scores in the relationship and face domains had the lowest quality ratings. Conclusions: Let's Talk may help families become better prepared for ICU family meetings. CQA provides a feasible approach to assessing communication quality that identifies specific areas of strengths and weaknesses in communication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新颖的重症监护室沟通干预("让我们谈谈")的可行性和可接受性,以及利用沟通的多重目标理论进行的初步评估。
背景:重症监护病房(ICU)患者的家属经常反映沟通不畅、对 ICU 家庭会议感觉毫无准备以及决策后心理结果不佳。本研究旨在开发一种工具,帮助家属为 ICU 家属会议做好准备,并评估使用沟通质量分析法(CQA)衡量家属会议沟通质量的可行性。研究方法本观察性研究于 2019 年 3 月至 2020 年在宾夕法尼亚州赫尔希的一家学术三级护理中心进行。第 1a 阶段涉及概念设计。第 1b 阶段需要对 2 个版本的工具(纯文字版和漫画版)进行可接受性测试,测试对象为 9 名非瘫痪重症监护病房患者的家属;对半抽样访谈进行了主题分析。第 1c 阶段评估了将 CQA 应用于 ICU 家庭会议录音(n = 17)的可行性;3 名分析师使用 CQA 评估了沟通质量的 6 个领域。采用 Wilcoxon Signed Rank 检验来解释 CQA 分数。结果:第 1b 阶段的访谈中出现了四个主题:参与者 1) 认为该工具有助于会议准备和整理思路;2) 欣赏情感内容;3) 更喜欢漫画形式(67%);4) 对特定元素持无所谓或负面看法。在第 1c 阶段,临床医生在 CQA 内容和参与领域得分较高;家庭成员在情感领域得分较高。关系和面孔领域的 CQA 分数最低。结论:让我们谈谈 "可以帮助家属更好地准备 ICU 家庭会议。CQA 为评估沟通质量提供了一种可行的方法,可以确定沟通中的具体强项和弱项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Pain Outcomes Among Medical Centers With High vs Low Specialist Palliative Care Reach Among People With Heart Failure. Exploring the Perceptions of Families and Nurses After Signing a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order for Patients in Respiratory Care Wards Differences in Timely Goals of Care Discussions in Nursing Homes Among Black Residents A Way Forward for Comprehensive Cancer Caregiver Support Development of a Hospice Perceptions Instrument for Diverse Patients and Families: Establishing Content and Face Validity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1