Sexual and Gender Minority Differences in Likelihood of Being a Caregiver and Levels of Caregiver Strain in a Sample of Older Adults.

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Homosexuality Pub Date : 2024-08-23 Epub Date: 2023-07-17 DOI:10.1080/00918369.2023.2233656
Ethan Morgan, Christina Dyar, Brian A Feinstein, Karen Rose
{"title":"Sexual and Gender Minority Differences in Likelihood of Being a Caregiver and Levels of Caregiver Strain in a Sample of Older Adults.","authors":"Ethan Morgan, Christina Dyar, Brian A Feinstein, Karen Rose","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2023.2233656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the next two decades, the number of caregivers is expected to climb dramatically alongside a rise in older adults, particularly sexual and gender minority (SGM) older adults, yet little research has assessed differences between SGM and non-SGM care partners. Data for these analyses come from the Columbus Healthy Aging Project (<i>N</i> = 79). This study was designed to assess several domains of health among adults aged ≥50 years in Columbus, Ohio, US. Multivariable regression models were used to examine the likelihood of being a care partner, the SGM identity of the primary care recipient, and caregiver strain. In our sample, 227 (28.6%) participants self-identified as care partners for at least one individual. Compared to heterosexuals, gay/lesbian (aOR = 8.38; 95% CI: 5.29, 13.29) participants were more likely to be care partners but did not experience elevated caregiver strain. Bisexual individuals (aIRR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.11, 2.61) reported greater caregiver strain, while those identifying as a different sexual identity reported lower caregiver strain (aIRR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.96). In turn, caregiver strain was reduced significantly when the care recipient identified as a member of the SGM community (aIRR = 0.67: 95% CI: 0.55, 0.80). These results suggest that SGM care partners may be at risk of unique stressors which may contribute to extant health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10792100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2023.2233656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the next two decades, the number of caregivers is expected to climb dramatically alongside a rise in older adults, particularly sexual and gender minority (SGM) older adults, yet little research has assessed differences between SGM and non-SGM care partners. Data for these analyses come from the Columbus Healthy Aging Project (N = 79). This study was designed to assess several domains of health among adults aged ≥50 years in Columbus, Ohio, US. Multivariable regression models were used to examine the likelihood of being a care partner, the SGM identity of the primary care recipient, and caregiver strain. In our sample, 227 (28.6%) participants self-identified as care partners for at least one individual. Compared to heterosexuals, gay/lesbian (aOR = 8.38; 95% CI: 5.29, 13.29) participants were more likely to be care partners but did not experience elevated caregiver strain. Bisexual individuals (aIRR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.11, 2.61) reported greater caregiver strain, while those identifying as a different sexual identity reported lower caregiver strain (aIRR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.96). In turn, caregiver strain was reduced significantly when the care recipient identified as a member of the SGM community (aIRR = 0.67: 95% CI: 0.55, 0.80). These results suggest that SGM care partners may be at risk of unique stressors which may contribute to extant health disparities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在老年人样本中,性少数群体和性别少数群体在成为照顾者的可能性和照顾者压力水平上的差异。
在未来二十年中,随着老年人,尤其是性与性别少数群体(SGM)老年人的增加,护理人员的数量预计将大幅攀升,但很少有研究对 SGM 与非 SGM 护理伙伴之间的差异进行评估。这些分析数据来自哥伦布健康老龄化项目(N = 79)。这项研究旨在评估美国俄亥俄州哥伦布市年龄≥50 岁的成年人的几个健康领域。研究采用了多变量回归模型来考察作为护理伴侣的可能性、主要护理对象的 SGM 身份以及护理者的压力。在我们的样本中,有 227 名参与者(28.6%)自我认同为至少一人的护理伙伴。与异性恋者相比,同性恋者(aOR = 8.38; 95% CI: 5.29, 13.29)更有可能成为护理伙伴,但他们的护理压力并没有增加。双性恋者(aIRR = 1.70,95% CI:1.11, 2.61)的照顾者压力更大,而不同性身份者的照顾者压力较小(aIRR = 0.46,95% CI:0.23, 0.96)。反过来,当被照顾者认同为 SGM 群体成员时,照顾者的压力也会明显减轻(aIRR = 0.67:95% CI:0.55, 0.80)。这些结果表明,SGM 护理伙伴可能会面临独特压力的风险,而这些压力可能会导致现存的健康差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
期刊最新文献
Coping Patterns During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Sexual and Gender Identity. "Dancing Steps of #WeToo Resistance": Choreography of Masculinity, Sexuality, and Violence on an Israeli Stage. Sexual Diversity Bullying and Cyberbullying Questionnaires: An Inclusive Approach to Measure Sexuality-Based Bullying. Self-Disclosure of Loneliness by LGBTQ+ Twitter Users During COVID-19. From the Margins to the Mainstream: Explicating and Validating Queer Readings Among Sexual Minority Youth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1