Prophylactic Administration of Vasopressors Prior to Emergency Intubation in Critically Ill Patients: A Secondary Analysis of Two Multicenter Clinical Trials.

Critical Care Explorations Pub Date : 2023-07-12 eCollection Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000946
Mikita Fuchita, Jack Pattee, Derek W Russell, Brian E Driver, Matthew E Prekker, Christopher R Barnes, Joseph M Brewer, Kevin C Doerschug, John P Gaillard, Sheetal Gandotra, Shekhar Ghamande, Kevin W Gibbs, Christopher G Hughes, David R Janz, Akram Khan, Steven H Mitchell, David B Page, Todd W Rice, Wesley H Self, Lane M Smith, Susan B Stempek, Stacy A Trent, Derek J Vonderhaar, Jason R West, Micah R Whitson, Kayla Williamson, Matthew W Semler, Jonathan D Casey, Adit A Ginde
{"title":"Prophylactic Administration of Vasopressors Prior to Emergency Intubation in Critically Ill Patients: A Secondary Analysis of Two Multicenter Clinical Trials.","authors":"Mikita Fuchita, Jack Pattee, Derek W Russell, Brian E Driver, Matthew E Prekker, Christopher R Barnes, Joseph M Brewer, Kevin C Doerschug, John P Gaillard, Sheetal Gandotra, Shekhar Ghamande, Kevin W Gibbs, Christopher G Hughes, David R Janz, Akram Khan, Steven H Mitchell, David B Page, Todd W Rice, Wesley H Self, Lane M Smith, Susan B Stempek, Stacy A Trent, Derek J Vonderhaar, Jason R West, Micah R Whitson, Kayla Williamson, Matthew W Semler, Jonathan D Casey, Adit A Ginde","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypotension affects approximately 40% of critically ill patients undergoing emergency intubation and is associated with an increased risk of death. The objective of this study was to examine the association between prophylactic vasopressor administration and the incidence of peri-intubation hypotension and other clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A secondary analysis of two multicenter randomized clinical trials. The clinical effect of prophylactic vasopressor administration was estimated using a one-to-one propensity-matched cohort of patients with and without prophylactic vasopressors.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seven emergency departments and 17 ICUs across the United States.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>One thousand seven hundred ninety-eight critically ill patients who underwent emergency intubation at the study sites between February 1, 2019, and May 24, 2021.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was peri-intubation hypotension defined as a systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg occurring between induction and 2 minutes after tracheal intubation. A total of 187 patients (10%) received prophylactic vasopressors prior to intubation. Compared with patients who did not receive prophylactic vasopressors, those who did were older, had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, were more likely to have a diagnosis of sepsis, had lower pre-induction systolic blood pressures, and were more likely to be on continuous vasopressor infusions prior to intubation. In our propensity-matched cohort, prophylactic vasopressor administration was not associated with reduced risk of peri-intubation hypotension (41% vs 32%; <i>p</i> = 0.08) or change in systolic blood pressure from baseline (-12 vs -11 mm Hg; <i>p</i> = 0.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The administration of prophylactic vasopressors was not associated with a lower incidence of peri-intubation hypotension in our propensity-matched analysis. To address potential residual confounding, randomized clinical trials should examine the effect of prophylactic vasopressor administration on peri-intubation outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 7","pages":"e0946"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/92/27/cc9-5-e0946.PMC10344527.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypotension affects approximately 40% of critically ill patients undergoing emergency intubation and is associated with an increased risk of death. The objective of this study was to examine the association between prophylactic vasopressor administration and the incidence of peri-intubation hypotension and other clinical outcomes.

Design: A secondary analysis of two multicenter randomized clinical trials. The clinical effect of prophylactic vasopressor administration was estimated using a one-to-one propensity-matched cohort of patients with and without prophylactic vasopressors.

Setting: Seven emergency departments and 17 ICUs across the United States.

Patients: One thousand seven hundred ninety-eight critically ill patients who underwent emergency intubation at the study sites between February 1, 2019, and May 24, 2021.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was peri-intubation hypotension defined as a systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg occurring between induction and 2 minutes after tracheal intubation. A total of 187 patients (10%) received prophylactic vasopressors prior to intubation. Compared with patients who did not receive prophylactic vasopressors, those who did were older, had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, were more likely to have a diagnosis of sepsis, had lower pre-induction systolic blood pressures, and were more likely to be on continuous vasopressor infusions prior to intubation. In our propensity-matched cohort, prophylactic vasopressor administration was not associated with reduced risk of peri-intubation hypotension (41% vs 32%; p = 0.08) or change in systolic blood pressure from baseline (-12 vs -11 mm Hg; p = 0.66).

Conclusions: The administration of prophylactic vasopressors was not associated with a lower incidence of peri-intubation hypotension in our propensity-matched analysis. To address potential residual confounding, randomized clinical trials should examine the effect of prophylactic vasopressor administration on peri-intubation outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症患者紧急插管前预防性使用血管加压素:两项多中心临床试验的二次分析。
在接受紧急插管的重症患者中,约有 40% 的患者会出现低血压,并与死亡风险增加有关。本研究旨在探讨预防性使用血管加压素与插管周围低血压发生率及其他临床结果之间的关系:设计:对两项多中心随机临床试验进行二次分析。通过对使用和未使用预防性血管加压剂的患者进行一对一倾向匹配,估计预防性使用血管加压剂的临床效果:背景:全美 7 个急诊科和 17 个重症监护室:2019年2月1日至2021年5月24日期间在研究地点接受急诊插管的1798名重症患者:测量和主要结果主要结果是插管周围低血压,定义为气管插管后诱导至 2 分钟内发生的收缩压低于 90 mm Hg。共有 187 名患者(10%)在插管前接受了预防性血管加压。与未接受预防性血管加压药的患者相比,接受预防性血管加压药的患者年龄更大、急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分更高、更有可能被诊断为脓毒症、诱导前收缩压更低、更有可能在插管前持续输注血管加压药。在我们的倾向匹配队列中,预防性使用血管加压素与插管前低血压风险的降低(41% vs 32%;P = 0.08)或收缩压与基线相比的变化(-12 vs -11毫米汞柱;P = 0.66)无关:结论:在我们的倾向匹配分析中,使用预防性血管加压药与降低插管周围低血压的发生率无关。为解决潜在的残余混杂因素,随机临床试验应检查预防性使用血管加压素对插管周围结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Dosing Frontier: Retrospective Assessment of Effluent Flow Rates and Residual Renal Function Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Hemodynamic Determinants of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19 Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1