Employment over the life course and post-retirement social networks: a gendered perspective.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY International psychogeriatrics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1017/S1041610223000558
Ella Cohn-Schwartz, Laura Naegele
{"title":"Employment over the life course and post-retirement social networks: a gendered perspective.","authors":"Ella Cohn-Schwartz, Laura Naegele","doi":"10.1017/S1041610223000558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study examines how different lifelong employment patterns are related to social relationships in old age, and whether there are gender differences in the impact of lifelong employment patterns.</p><p><strong>Designs and participants: </strong>The study was based on data collected among European adults as part of the Health, Aging and Retirement Survey in Europe (SHARE) and focuses on retired adults.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The study combines data on social relationships, collected in 2015, with retrospective data on employment history (number of jobs and years of employment) collected in 2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings show that adults who worked in more jobs had overall better structural characteristics of their later life networks - they had larger social networks and were more likely to include children and friends within those networks but less likely to include their spouse. On the other hand, working in more jobs was related to less emotional closeness with the network. These results varied between men and women; women who were involved in the labor market over their life had larger social networks and tended to include friends as confidants. Among men, working for more years was related to higher emotional closeness with the social network.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study may indicate a gendered pattern of social advantages and disadvantages to involvement in the labor market over the work course. Practitioners should consider the lifelong employment of adults to identify those who might be at risk of social isolation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14368,"journal":{"name":"International psychogeriatrics","volume":" ","pages":"655-665"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610223000558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The present study examines how different lifelong employment patterns are related to social relationships in old age, and whether there are gender differences in the impact of lifelong employment patterns.

Designs and participants: The study was based on data collected among European adults as part of the Health, Aging and Retirement Survey in Europe (SHARE) and focuses on retired adults.

Measurements: The study combines data on social relationships, collected in 2015, with retrospective data on employment history (number of jobs and years of employment) collected in 2017.

Results: The findings show that adults who worked in more jobs had overall better structural characteristics of their later life networks - they had larger social networks and were more likely to include children and friends within those networks but less likely to include their spouse. On the other hand, working in more jobs was related to less emotional closeness with the network. These results varied between men and women; women who were involved in the labor market over their life had larger social networks and tended to include friends as confidants. Among men, working for more years was related to higher emotional closeness with the social network.

Conclusions: The study may indicate a gendered pattern of social advantages and disadvantages to involvement in the labor market over the work course. Practitioners should consider the lifelong employment of adults to identify those who might be at risk of social isolation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
终身就业与退休后社会网络:性别视角。
目的:探讨不同终身就业模式对老年社会关系的影响,以及终身就业模式对老年社会关系的影响是否存在性别差异。设计和参与者:该研究基于在欧洲成年人中收集的数据,这些数据是欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)的一部分,主要针对退休成年人。测量方法:该研究结合了2015年收集的社会关系数据和2017年收集的就业历史(工作数量和就业年限)的回顾性数据。结果:研究结果表明,从事更多工作的成年人,其晚年生活网络的总体结构特征更好——他们有更大的社交网络,更有可能在这些网络中包括孩子和朋友,但不太可能包括他们的配偶。另一方面,从事更多的工作与人际网络的情感亲密度降低有关。这些结果在男性和女性之间有所不同;一生中参与劳动力市场的女性拥有更大的社交网络,并倾向于将朋友视为知己。在男性中,工作年限越长,与社交网络的情感亲密度越高。结论:该研究可能表明在工作过程中参与劳动力市场的社会优势和劣势的性别模式。从业人员应考虑终身雇佣成年人,以确定那些可能面临社会孤立风险的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International psychogeriatrics
International psychogeriatrics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: A highly respected, multidisciplinary journal, International Psychogeriatrics publishes high quality original research papers in the field of psychogeriatrics. The journal aims to be the leading peer reviewed journal dealing with all aspects of the mental health of older people throughout the world. Circulated to over 1,000 members of the International Psychogeriatric Association, International Psychogeriatrics also features important editorials, provocative debates, literature reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Supporting the practical and emotional process of giving-up driving in later life for those living with dementia. Potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on everyday preferences for persons with cognitive impairment. Clinical characteristics of early-onset versus late-onset Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cognitive decline in Alzheimer's: faster in early-onset than late-onset disease. Developing the Driving and Dementia Roadmap: a knowledge-to-action process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1