Combatting Social Isolation, Anxiety, and Loneliness in Hospitalized Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Nursing Administration Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1097/NNA.0000000000001304
Alyson Keen, Lauren Deike, Jaimee Haan
{"title":"Combatting Social Isolation, Anxiety, and Loneliness in Hospitalized Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Alyson Keen,&nbsp;Lauren Deike,&nbsp;Jaimee Haan","doi":"10.1097/NNA.0000000000001304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of an intervention related to social isolation and loneliness among hospitalized patients by improving: 1) social connectedness; 2) anxiety; and 3) loneliness and to evaluate experiences of the connection intervention.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Social isolation and loneliness can lead to detrimental effects on morbidity/mortality and health indices. A connection intervention was developed by investigators using key strategies to promote connectedness, providing in-person contact for hospitalized patients to meet individual and self-care needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quasi-experimental study was conducted in a Midwest adult academic health center. Social connectedness, anxiety, and loneliness were evaluated at baseline and postintervention using a paired-sample t test. Experience responses were analyzed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in social connectedness, anxiety, or loneliness when comparing baseline with postintervention. Experience themes included sharing personal stories back and forth, treating me as a person, mitigating loneliness, and finding benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite nonsignificant findings, participants found benefit in filling the social void of being an inpatient. Clinicians should ensure that holistic care is delivered to hospitalized inpatients. Inclusive patient-centered strategies targeted to decrease social isolation and loneliness among acute care inpatients should continue to be developed and tested.</p>","PeriodicalId":50108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Administration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of an intervention related to social isolation and loneliness among hospitalized patients by improving: 1) social connectedness; 2) anxiety; and 3) loneliness and to evaluate experiences of the connection intervention.

Background: Social isolation and loneliness can lead to detrimental effects on morbidity/mortality and health indices. A connection intervention was developed by investigators using key strategies to promote connectedness, providing in-person contact for hospitalized patients to meet individual and self-care needs.

Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted in a Midwest adult academic health center. Social connectedness, anxiety, and loneliness were evaluated at baseline and postintervention using a paired-sample t test. Experience responses were analyzed using content analysis.

Results: There were no significant differences in social connectedness, anxiety, or loneliness when comparing baseline with postintervention. Experience themes included sharing personal stories back and forth, treating me as a person, mitigating loneliness, and finding benefit.

Conclusion: Despite nonsignificant findings, participants found benefit in filling the social void of being an inpatient. Clinicians should ensure that holistic care is delivered to hospitalized inpatients. Inclusive patient-centered strategies targeted to decrease social isolation and loneliness among acute care inpatients should continue to be developed and tested.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对抗住院患者的社交孤立、焦虑和孤独:一项准实验研究。
目的:本研究的目的是通过改善以下方面来确定住院患者中与社会孤立和孤独相关的干预措施的有效性:1)社会联系;2) 焦虑;以及3)孤独感和评估连接干预的体验。背景:社会孤立和孤独会对发病率/死亡率和健康指数产生不利影响。研究人员利用促进联系的关键策略开发了一种联系干预措施,为住院患者提供面对面的联系,以满足个人和自我护理需求。方法:这项准实验研究是在中西部的一个成人学术健康中心进行的。使用配对样本t检验在基线和干预后评估社交联系、焦虑和孤独。使用内容分析对经验反应进行分析。结果:与干预后相比,在社会联系、焦虑或孤独感方面没有显著差异。体验主题包括来回分享个人故事、将我视为一个人、减轻孤独感和寻找利益。结论:尽管研究结果并不显著,但参与者发现,填补住院患者的社会空白是有益的。临床医生应确保为住院患者提供全面护理。应继续制定和测试以患者为中心的包容性策略,以减少急性护理住院患者的社交孤立和孤独感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​JONA™ is the authoritative source of information on developments and advances in patient care leadership. Content is geared to nurse executives, directors of nursing, and nurse managers in hospital, community health, and ambulatory care environments. Practical, innovative, and solution-oriented articles provide the tools and data needed to excel in executive practice in changing healthcare systems: leadership development; human, material, and financial resource management and relationships; systems, business, and financial strategies. All articles are peer-reviewed, selected and developed with the guidance of a distinguished group of editorial advisors.
期刊最新文献
National Incidence of Nurse Suicide and Associated Features. Exploring Reasons for Satisfaction with Job Assignments Among Travel Nurses. Institution-Wide Moral Distress Among Nurses. Measuring Professional Governance: The Swedish Version of the Verran Professional Governance Scale©. Advanced Practice Nurse-Led Research: Challenges and Approaches to Digital Health Programs' Evaluation Using Big Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1