The advantages of penehyclidine hydrochloride over atropine in acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning: A meta-analysis

Siyao Zeng , Lei Ma , Lishan Yang , Xiaodong Hu , Cheng Wang , Xinxin Guo , Yi Li , Yi Gou , Yao Zhang , Shengming Li , Shaotong Zhang , Xiaoxuan Wu , Meihong Li , Jing Lei , Bingqian Li , Chengfei Bi , Like Ma , Qingpeng Luo
{"title":"The advantages of penehyclidine hydrochloride over atropine in acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning: A meta-analysis","authors":"Siyao Zeng ,&nbsp;Lei Ma ,&nbsp;Lishan Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Hu ,&nbsp;Cheng Wang ,&nbsp;Xinxin Guo ,&nbsp;Yi Li ,&nbsp;Yi Gou ,&nbsp;Yao Zhang ,&nbsp;Shengming Li ,&nbsp;Shaotong Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaoxuan Wu ,&nbsp;Meihong Li ,&nbsp;Jing Lei ,&nbsp;Bingqian Li ,&nbsp;Chengfei Bi ,&nbsp;Like Ma ,&nbsp;Qingpeng Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.jointm.2022.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Penehyclidine hydrochloride (PHC) has been used for many years as an anticholinergic drug for the treatment of acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning (AOPP). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to explore whether PHC has advantages over atropine in the use of anticholinergic drugs in AOPP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, PubMed, ProQuest, Ovid, Web of Science, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Duxiu, Chinese Biomedical literature (CBM), WanFang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), from inception to March 2022. After all qualified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, we conducted quality evaluation, data extraction, and statistical analysis. Statistics using risk ratios (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and standard mean difference (SMD).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our meta-analysis included 20,797 subjects from 240 studies across 242 different hospitals in China. Compared with the atropine group, the PHC group showed decreased mortality rate (RR=0.20, 95% confidence intervals <strong>[</strong>CI]: 0.16–0.25, <em>P</em> &lt;0.001), hospitalization time (WMD=−3.89, 95% CI: −4.37 to −3.41, <em>P</em> &lt;0.001), overall incidence rate of complications (RR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.28–0.43, <em>P</em> &lt;0.001), overall incidence of adverse reactions (RR=0.19, 95% CI: 0.17–0.22, <em>P</em> &lt;0.001), total symptom disappearance time (SMD=−2.13, 95% CI: −2.35 to −1.90, <em>P</em> &lt;0.001), time for cholinesterase activity to return to normal value 50–60% (SMD=−1.87, 95% CI: −2.03 to −1.70, <em>P</em> &lt;0.001), coma time (WMD=−5.57, 95% CI: −7.20 to −3.95, <em>P</em> &lt;0.001), and mechanical ventilation time (WMD=−2.16, 95% CI: −2.79 to −1.53, <em>P</em> &lt;0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PHC has several advantages over atropine as an anticholinergic drug in AOPP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of intensive medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/41/main.PMC10175710.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of intensive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X22000937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Penehyclidine hydrochloride (PHC) has been used for many years as an anticholinergic drug for the treatment of acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning (AOPP). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to explore whether PHC has advantages over atropine in the use of anticholinergic drugs in AOPP.

Methods

We searched Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, PubMed, ProQuest, Ovid, Web of Science, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Duxiu, Chinese Biomedical literature (CBM), WanFang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), from inception to March 2022. After all qualified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, we conducted quality evaluation, data extraction, and statistical analysis. Statistics using risk ratios (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and standard mean difference (SMD).

Results

Our meta-analysis included 20,797 subjects from 240 studies across 242 different hospitals in China. Compared with the atropine group, the PHC group showed decreased mortality rate (RR=0.20, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.16–0.25, P <0.001), hospitalization time (WMD=−3.89, 95% CI: −4.37 to −3.41, P <0.001), overall incidence rate of complications (RR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.28–0.43, P <0.001), overall incidence of adverse reactions (RR=0.19, 95% CI: 0.17–0.22, P <0.001), total symptom disappearance time (SMD=−2.13, 95% CI: −2.35 to −1.90, P <0.001), time for cholinesterase activity to return to normal value 50–60% (SMD=−1.87, 95% CI: −2.03 to −1.70, P <0.001), coma time (WMD=−5.57, 95% CI: −7.20 to −3.95, P <0.001), and mechanical ventilation time (WMD=−2.16, 95% CI: −2.79 to −1.53, P <0.001).

Conclusion

PHC has several advantages over atropine as an anticholinergic drug in AOPP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性有机磷农药中毒时盐酸培乙clidine优于阿托品的荟萃分析
背景盐酸戊环哌啶(PHC)作为一种抗胆碱能药物治疗急性有机磷农药中毒(AOPP)已有多年历史。本荟萃分析的目的是探讨PHC在AOPP中使用抗胆碱能药物是否优于阿托品。方法检索Scopus、Embase、Cochrane、PubMed、ProQuest、Ovid、Web of Science、中国科技期刊数据库(VIP)、独秀、中国生物医学文献(CBM)、万方和中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),从成立到2022年3月。在纳入所有合格的随机对照试验(RCT)后,我们进行了质量评估、数据提取和统计分析。使用风险比(RR)、加权平均差(WMD)和标准平均差(SMD)进行统计。结果我们的荟萃分析包括来自中国242家不同医院240项研究的20797名受试者。与阿托品组相比,PHC组的死亡率(RR=0.20,95%置信区间[CI]:0.16–0.25,P<;0.001)、住院时间(WMD=−3.89,95%CI:−4.37至−3.41,P<:0.001)、并发症总发生率(RR=0.35,95%CI:0.28–0.43,P<!0.001)、不良反应总发生率,总症状消失时间(SMD=−2.13,95%CI:−2.35至−1.90,P<;0.001),胆碱酯酶活性恢复正常值的时间50-60%(SMD=−1.87,95%CI:−2.03至−1.70,P>;0.001)、昏迷时间(WMD=−5.57,95%CI:−7.20至−3.95,P<),和机械通气时间(WMD=−2.16,95%可信区间:−2.79至−1.53,P<;0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of intensive medicine
Journal of intensive medicine Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Advancing understanding and management of invasive fungal diseases in the intensive care unit: Insights from FUNDICU consensus definitions Investigating computational models for diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis based on clinical parameters: Opportunities, challenges, and future research directions Association between hyperglycemia at ICU admission and postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Analysis of the MIMIC-IV database Adaptive platform trials in critical care Metabolomic profiling and prognostication in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1