Assessing the Modified Neighborhood Cohesion Index Among African American Adolescents Living in Public Housing: An Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1086/716084
Melissa L Villodas, Von E Nebbitt, Margaret Lombe, Mansoo Yu, Andrew Foell, Henrika McCoy, Ngozi V Enelamah
{"title":"Assessing the Modified Neighborhood Cohesion Index Among African American Adolescents Living in Public Housing: An Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis.","authors":"Melissa L Villodas,&nbsp;Von E Nebbitt,&nbsp;Margaret Lombe,&nbsp;Mansoo Yu,&nbsp;Andrew Foell,&nbsp;Henrika McCoy,&nbsp;Ngozi V Enelamah","doi":"10.1086/716084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>African American youth are disproportionately overrepresented in low-resourced segregated urban neighborhoods. Consequently, they experience greater exposure to neighborhood risks and subsequent depressive symptoms. Neighborhood cohesion represents a protective factor for youth in such environments. However, the concept remains underexplored among African American youth. This study examines the psychometric properties of a modified version of the Neighborhood Cohesion Index (NCI) among African American youth living in public housing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Psychometric properties were assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses using data from African American youth (<i>N</i> = 235) living in public housing in two large northeastern cities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EFA resulted in the use of a single-factor structure with two dropped items and good internal validity. Findings from the CFA indicated that model fit indices were unacceptable for chi-square and RMSEA (χ2 [62; <i>N</i> = 235] = 170.19, p < .001); RMSEA = 0.09 [90% CI: 0.071, 0.102]) but were acceptable for SRMR and CFI (SRMR = 0.06; CFI = 0.91) with three error covariances.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified NCI is not ideal for assessing neighborhood cohesion among this understudied population. Future research should prioritize psychometric testing alongside cognitive interviewing, to provide a contextualized measure of neighborhood cohesion for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348703/pdf/nihms-1837377.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/716084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: African American youth are disproportionately overrepresented in low-resourced segregated urban neighborhoods. Consequently, they experience greater exposure to neighborhood risks and subsequent depressive symptoms. Neighborhood cohesion represents a protective factor for youth in such environments. However, the concept remains underexplored among African American youth. This study examines the psychometric properties of a modified version of the Neighborhood Cohesion Index (NCI) among African American youth living in public housing.

Method: Psychometric properties were assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses using data from African American youth (N = 235) living in public housing in two large northeastern cities.

Results: The EFA resulted in the use of a single-factor structure with two dropped items and good internal validity. Findings from the CFA indicated that model fit indices were unacceptable for chi-square and RMSEA (χ2 [62; N = 235] = 170.19, p < .001); RMSEA = 0.09 [90% CI: 0.071, 0.102]) but were acceptable for SRMR and CFI (SRMR = 0.06; CFI = 0.91) with three error covariances.

Conclusions: The modified NCI is not ideal for assessing neighborhood cohesion among this understudied population. Future research should prioritize psychometric testing alongside cognitive interviewing, to provide a contextualized measure of neighborhood cohesion for this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估居住在公共住房中的非裔美国青少年的改良邻里凝聚力指数:一个探索性和验证性因素分析。
目的:非洲裔美国青年在资源匮乏的隔离城市社区中比例过高。因此,他们更容易暴露于社区风险和随后的抑郁症状。在这种环境中,邻里凝聚力是青年人的一种保护因素。然而,这个概念在非裔美国青年中仍未得到充分探索。本研究考察了居住在公共住房中的非裔美国青年的社区凝聚力指数(NCI)的修正版本的心理测量特性。方法:通过探索性和验证性因素分析,对东北两个大城市居住在公共住房中的非裔美国青年(N = 235)的心理测量特性进行评估。结果:EFA采用单因素结构,有两个丢弃项,具有良好的内部效度。CFA的结果表明,卡方和RMSEA的模型拟合指数是不可接受的(χ2 [62;N = 235] = 170.19, p < .001);RMSEA = 0.09 [90% CI: 0.071, 0.102]),但SRMR和CFI是可以接受的(SRMR = 0.06;CFI = 0.91),误差协方差为3。结论:改良的NCI在评估这一未充分研究人群的邻里凝聚力方面并不理想。未来的研究应优先考虑心理测量测试和认知访谈,为这一人群提供一种情境化的邻里凝聚力测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to presenting innovative, rigorous original research on social problems, intervention programs, and policies. By creating a venue for the timely dissemination of empirical findings and advances in research methods, JSSWR seeks to strengthen the rigor of social work research and advance the knowledge in social work and allied professions and disciplines. Special emphasis is placed on publishing findings on the effectiveness of social and health services, including public policies and practices. JSSWR publishes an array of perspectives, research approaches, and types of analyses that advance knowledge useful for designing social programs, developing innovative public policies, and improving social work practice.
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of the Organizational Evaluation Capacity Scale among Nongovernmental Organizations in Hong Kong Examining the effect of previous interactions with social workers on divorced fathers' perceptions of them and the likelihood of seeking their help Does Sharing Activities With Parents Protect African American Adolescents From Low Self-Esteem When Bullied? Commentary on the Racialized Experiences of Asian Americans and Implications for Anti-Racist Research Predictor Importance of Childhood Trauma to Early Literacy Skills in Kindergarteners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1