Mindfulness mechanisms in alcohol use: Comparing top-down and bottom-up processes.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology of Addictive Behaviors Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-18 DOI:10.1037/adb0000932
Carillon J Skrzynski, Angela D Bryan, Kent E Hutchison
{"title":"Mindfulness mechanisms in alcohol use: Comparing top-down and bottom-up processes.","authors":"Carillon J Skrzynski, Angela D Bryan, Kent E Hutchison","doi":"10.1037/adb0000932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared two mechanisms by which mindfulness may reduce hazardous drinking: effortful control and craving, \"top-down\" and \"bottom-up\" processes, respectively. These relationships were compared in a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of mindfulness-based relapse prevention (MBRP) versus relapse prevention (RP) treatments to explore if they differed based on more explicit versus subtle mindfulness training.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 182 individuals (48.4% female; 21-60 years old) who reported drinking > 14/21 drinks/week (for females/males, respectively) in the past 3 months but who wished to quit/reduce their drinking were recruited from Denver and Boulder, CO, United States. Participants were randomly assigned to either 8 weeks of MBRP or RP treatment and completed assessments at baseline, halfway through treatment, and at the end of treatment. The Five-Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form, Alcohol Urge Questionnaire, and Effortful Control Scale completed halfway through treatment assessed the predictor, dispositional mindfulness, and mediators, craving and effortful control, respectively. The Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Task was completed after treatment and measured hazardous drinking. Cross-group path analyses were conducted including both mediators/treatments in the same model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing models with and without equality constraints across treatments, no paths significantly differed based on a chi-square test of difference, <i>χ</i>²(5) = 5.11, <i>p</i> = .40, and only the indirect effect of craving was significant (<i>B</i> = -1.01, <i>p</i> = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest mindfulness may be associated with hazardous drinking reductions through craving but not effortful control and this indirect relationship works similarly across treatments engendering mindfulness explicitly and implicitly. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48325,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","volume":" ","pages":"92-100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000932","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study compared two mechanisms by which mindfulness may reduce hazardous drinking: effortful control and craving, "top-down" and "bottom-up" processes, respectively. These relationships were compared in a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of mindfulness-based relapse prevention (MBRP) versus relapse prevention (RP) treatments to explore if they differed based on more explicit versus subtle mindfulness training.

Method: A total of 182 individuals (48.4% female; 21-60 years old) who reported drinking > 14/21 drinks/week (for females/males, respectively) in the past 3 months but who wished to quit/reduce their drinking were recruited from Denver and Boulder, CO, United States. Participants were randomly assigned to either 8 weeks of MBRP or RP treatment and completed assessments at baseline, halfway through treatment, and at the end of treatment. The Five-Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form, Alcohol Urge Questionnaire, and Effortful Control Scale completed halfway through treatment assessed the predictor, dispositional mindfulness, and mediators, craving and effortful control, respectively. The Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Task was completed after treatment and measured hazardous drinking. Cross-group path analyses were conducted including both mediators/treatments in the same model.

Results: Comparing models with and without equality constraints across treatments, no paths significantly differed based on a chi-square test of difference, χ²(5) = 5.11, p = .40, and only the indirect effect of craving was significant (B = -1.01, p = .01).

Conclusions: Findings suggest mindfulness may be associated with hazardous drinking reductions through craving but not effortful control and this indirect relationship works similarly across treatments engendering mindfulness explicitly and implicitly. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酒精使用中的正念机制:比较自上而下和自下而上的过程。
目的:本研究比较了正念减少危险饮酒的两种机制:努力控制和渴望,分别是“自上而下”和“自下而上”的过程。在一项基于正念的复发预防(MBRP)与复发预防(RP)治疗的随机对照试验的二次分析中,比较了这些关系,以探索它们是否基于更明确的正念训练与微妙的正念训练而有所不同。方法:共182只,其中雌性48.4%;研究招募了来自美国科罗拉多州丹佛和博尔德的21-60岁的人,他们在过去3个月内报告每周饮酒14/21杯(分别为女性/男性),但希望戒烟/减少饮酒。参与者被随机分配到8周的MBRP或RP治疗中,并在基线、治疗中途和治疗结束时完成评估。在治疗中途完成的五因素正念问卷(简短形式)、酒精冲动问卷和努力控制量表分别评估了预测因子、倾向正念和中介因子、渴望和努力控制。治疗后完成酒精使用障碍识别任务并测量有害饮酒。在同一模型中对两种介质/治疗进行了跨组路径分析。结果:在不同治疗间比较有无平等约束的模型,通过卡方差异检验,无显著路径差异,χ 2 (5) = 5.11, p = 0.40,只有渴望的间接影响显著(B = -1.01, p = 0.01)。结论:研究结果表明,正念可能与通过渴望减少危险饮酒有关,但与努力控制无关,这种间接关系在产生正念的显性和隐性治疗中相似。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Psychology of Addictive Behaviors publishes peer-reviewed original articles related to the psychological aspects of addictive behaviors. The journal includes articles on the following topics: - alcohol and alcoholism - drug use and abuse - eating disorders - smoking and nicotine addiction, and other excessive behaviors (e.g., gambling) Full-length research reports, literature reviews, brief reports, and comments are published.
期刊最新文献
Does self-affirmation augment the effects of a mandated personalized feedback intervention? A randomized controlled trial with heavy drinking college students. Do changes in mood and anxiety mediate exercise-induced reductions in alcohol cravings? An exploratory study. Using causal mediation to examine self-efficacy as a mechanism through which continuing care interventions reduce alcohol use. The impact of family systems and social networks on substance use initiation and recovery among women with substance use disorders. From alcohol detoxification to treatment: A qualitative interview study on perceived barriers and assessed potential of mHealth among individuals postdetoxification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1