Opportunities Missed: Cervix Cancer Screening Failures in Women Aged 65 and Older.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-19 DOI:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000759
Brandon I Ing, Marla E Scott, Scott E Lentz
{"title":"Opportunities Missed: Cervix Cancer Screening Failures in Women Aged 65 and Older.","authors":"Brandon I Ing,&nbsp;Marla E Scott,&nbsp;Scott E Lentz","doi":"10.1097/LGT.0000000000000759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the screening history and associated outcomes of women diagnosed with cervical cancer after age 65.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients from 2012 to 2021 diagnosed with squamous, adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine, or adenosquamous cervical cancer after age 65 in a single managed care organization (MCO) were included in this retrospective cohort study. Demographic, medical, screening, pathologic, follow-up, and treatment data were extracted. Statistical analysis was done using chi-square test and logistic regression. Cancer-specific survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,175 patients screened, 209 met inclusion criteria. Only 26.3% of patients had appropriate cervical cancer screening and 41% of patients died of their disease. Managed care organization membership duration of more than 5 years positively correlated with proper cervical cancer screening ( p < .001); however, 64% of the long-term members still did not meet criteria to end screening at age 65, with 42.6% of these patients having more than 25 physician visit opportunities to address screening. Increased physician visits correlated with earlier stage at diagnosis of cervical cancer ( p = .012). Median cancer-specific survival was significantly better in properly screened patients at 68 vs 30 months, respectively ( p = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients diagnosed with cervical cancer after age 65 did not have adequate previous screening, including those who were MCO members for more than 5 years. There were many missed opportunities for screening, despite multiple provider touchpoints. The authors' data suggest that adequate screening confers a survival benefit secondary to earlier stage at diagnosis. Further study in this age group is needed to redefine the criteria to end cervix cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":50160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","volume":" ","pages":"337-342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000759","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the screening history and associated outcomes of women diagnosed with cervical cancer after age 65.

Methods: All patients from 2012 to 2021 diagnosed with squamous, adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine, or adenosquamous cervical cancer after age 65 in a single managed care organization (MCO) were included in this retrospective cohort study. Demographic, medical, screening, pathologic, follow-up, and treatment data were extracted. Statistical analysis was done using chi-square test and logistic regression. Cancer-specific survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Of 2,175 patients screened, 209 met inclusion criteria. Only 26.3% of patients had appropriate cervical cancer screening and 41% of patients died of their disease. Managed care organization membership duration of more than 5 years positively correlated with proper cervical cancer screening ( p < .001); however, 64% of the long-term members still did not meet criteria to end screening at age 65, with 42.6% of these patients having more than 25 physician visit opportunities to address screening. Increased physician visits correlated with earlier stage at diagnosis of cervical cancer ( p = .012). Median cancer-specific survival was significantly better in properly screened patients at 68 vs 30 months, respectively ( p = .03).

Conclusions: Most patients diagnosed with cervical cancer after age 65 did not have adequate previous screening, including those who were MCO members for more than 5 years. There were many missed opportunities for screening, despite multiple provider touchpoints. The authors' data suggest that adequate screening confers a survival benefit secondary to earlier stage at diagnosis. Further study in this age group is needed to redefine the criteria to end cervix cancer screening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
错过的机会:65岁及以上妇女的癌症宫颈筛查失败。
目的:本研究旨在确定65岁后诊断为宫颈癌症的女性的筛查史和相关结果。方法:将2012年至2021年在单一管理护理组织(MCO)中诊断为65岁后鳞状、腺癌、神经内分泌或腺鳞状癌症的所有患者纳入本回顾性队列研究。提取人口统计学、医学、筛查、病理学、随访和治疗数据。采用卡方检验和逻辑回归进行统计分析。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计癌症特异性存活率。结果:在2175名筛查患者中,209人符合入选标准。只有26.3%的患者进行了适当的宫颈癌症筛查,41%的患者死于疾病。管理护理组织成员资格持续时间超过5年与正确的宫颈癌症筛查呈正相关(p<.001);然而,64%的长期成员在65岁时仍不符合结束筛查的标准,其中42.6%的患者有超过25次就诊机会进行筛查。就诊次数增加与诊断宫颈癌症的早期阶段相关(p=.012)。正确筛查的患者在68个月时的癌症特异性生存率中位数分别比30个月时明显更好(p=.03)。结论:大多数65岁后诊断为癌症的患者之前没有进行充分的筛查,包括那些MCO成员超过5年的人。尽管有多个供应商接触点,但仍有许多人错过了筛查机会。作者的数据表明,充分的筛查可以带来继发于早期诊断的生存益处。需要对这一年龄组进行进一步研究,以重新定义终止癌症筛查的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the source for the latest science about benign and malignant conditions of the cervix, vagina, vulva, and anus. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original research original research that addresses prevalence, causes, mechanisms, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of lower genital tract disease. We publish clinical guidelines, position papers, cost-effectiveness analyses, narrative reviews, and systematic reviews, including meta-analyses. We also publish papers about research and reporting methods, opinions about controversial medical issues. Of particular note, we encourage material in any of the above mentioned categories that is related to improving patient care, avoiding medical errors, and comparative effectiveness research. We encourage publication of evidence-based guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, and decision aids. Original research and reviews may be sub-classified according to topic: cervix and HPV, vulva and vagina, perianal and anal, basic science, and education and learning. The scope and readership of the journal extend to several disciplines: gynecology, internal medicine, family practice, dermatology, physical therapy, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, sex therapy, and pharmacology. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease highlights needs for future research, and enhances health care. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the official journal of the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy, and sponsored by the Australian Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and the Society of Canadian Colposcopists.
期刊最新文献
Tiktok as a Source of Education and Misinformation in Lichen Sclerosus. Sexual Distress and Quality of Life in Women With Genital Erosive Lichen Planus-A Cross-sectional Study. Validation of the 2019 American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Online Cervical Cancer Screening Program via 9 Large-Cohort Data of Chinese Women. The Distribution of Cervical Transformation Zone and Its Impact on Colposcopic Diagnosis: A Multicenter Study in China. The Barriers and Perceived Benefits to Vulvar Self-examination in the Management of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1