Stevia vs. triple antibiotic paste: An intracanal battle?

IF 2.7 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dental and Medical Problems Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.17219/dmp/161681
Raghavendra Havale, Shrutha Santhebachalli Prakasha, Sharon Elizebeth George, Namratha Tharay, Shiny Raj, Chandrabanda Bhavana, Afreen Anjum Syed, Anand Kumar, Venkatesh Naik
{"title":"Stevia vs. triple antibiotic paste: An intracanal battle?","authors":"Raghavendra Havale, Shrutha Santhebachalli Prakasha, Sharon Elizebeth George, Namratha Tharay, Shiny Raj, Chandrabanda Bhavana, Afreen Anjum Syed, Anand Kumar, Venkatesh Naik","doi":"10.17219/dmp/161681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracanal medicaments are vital in treating the infections of the deciduous dentition due to the large percentage of accessory canals that hasten the microbial spread to the periradicular region. Though countless medicaments have been produced to reduce the microbial load and aid symptomatic relief, they still do not fulfill every function of an ideal medicament.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of Stevia rebaudiana (S. rebaudiana) and triple antibiotic paste (TAP) against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The present in vitro, parallel, double-blinded study had an equal allocation ratio. The specimens were prepared, randomly divided into 4 groups and inoculated with E. faecalis (ATCC35550). Following incubation, the first 3 groups were treated with S. rebaudiana, triple antibiotic therapy or carbopol gel, respectively, with the 4th negative control group left untreated. The microbial samples were collected before and after treatment, and the counts of colony-forming units (CFUs) were compared. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn's post-hoc and Wilcoxon's signed rank tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first 2 groups displayed a significant decrease in CFUs after drug application, while the carbopol and control groups showed an exponential increase. There was no statistically significant difference between the stevia and TAP groups (p = 0.630).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stevia gel was comparable to TAP in terms of antimicrobial efficacy, and can therefore be considered a new alternative in intracanal treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":" ","pages":"919-924"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/161681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intracanal medicaments are vital in treating the infections of the deciduous dentition due to the large percentage of accessory canals that hasten the microbial spread to the periradicular region. Though countless medicaments have been produced to reduce the microbial load and aid symptomatic relief, they still do not fulfill every function of an ideal medicament.

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of Stevia rebaudiana (S. rebaudiana) and triple antibiotic paste (TAP) against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis).

Material and methods: The present in vitro, parallel, double-blinded study had an equal allocation ratio. The specimens were prepared, randomly divided into 4 groups and inoculated with E. faecalis (ATCC35550). Following incubation, the first 3 groups were treated with S. rebaudiana, triple antibiotic therapy or carbopol gel, respectively, with the 4th negative control group left untreated. The microbial samples were collected before and after treatment, and the counts of colony-forming units (CFUs) were compared. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn's post-hoc and Wilcoxon's signed rank tests.

Results: The first 2 groups displayed a significant decrease in CFUs after drug application, while the carbopol and control groups showed an exponential increase. There was no statistically significant difference between the stevia and TAP groups (p = 0.630).

Conclusions: Stevia gel was comparable to TAP in terms of antimicrobial efficacy, and can therefore be considered a new alternative in intracanal treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甜菊糖和三重抗生素糊:一场肛门内的战斗?
背景:由于大量的副牙管会加速微生物向牙根周围区域的扩散,因此在治疗乳牙列感染时,管内药物是至关重要的。尽管无数的药物已经被生产出来,以减少微生物负荷和帮助缓解症状,但它们仍然不能满足理想药物的每一个功能。目的:评价和比较甜菊糖(S. rebaudiana)和三联抗生素糊剂(TAP)对粪肠球菌(E. faecalis)的抗菌效果。材料与方法:本研究采用体外、平行、双盲的方法,平均分配比例。制备标本,随机分为4组,接种粪肠球菌(ATCC35550)。孵育后,前3组分别给予利鲍迪亚那、三联抗生素治疗或卡波波凝胶治疗,第4组阴性对照组不给予治疗。采集处理前后的微生物样本,比较菌落形成单位(cfu)的计数。使用Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn's post-hoc和Wilcoxon's signed rank检验对结果进行分析。结果:用药后,前2组cfu明显降低,卡波波尔组和对照组cfu呈指数型升高。甜叶菊组与TAP组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.630)。结论:甜菊糖凝胶的抗菌效果与TAP相当,可被认为是一种新的肛管治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lifestyle, daily habits, sleep hygiene, and diet: Proposal of a new approach for sleep bruxism management. Stevia vs. triple antibiotic paste: An intracanal battle? Advancements in alveolar bone reconstruction: A systematic review of bone block utilization in dental practice. Evaluating the accuracy of one-piece and three-piece 3D-printed indirect bonding transfer trays: An in vitro study. Searching for a relationship between the elemental composition of archaeological bones and the occurrence of caries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1