Detection of Sarcopenia in a Community-Dwelling Older Population in China.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2023-07-13 DOI:10.1519/JPT.0000000000000388
Hai Yan Zhang, Mei Chan Chong, Maw Pin Tan, Yan Piaw Chua, Jin Hua Zhang
{"title":"Detection of Sarcopenia in a Community-Dwelling Older Population in China.","authors":"Hai Yan Zhang,&nbsp;Mei Chan Chong,&nbsp;Maw Pin Tan,&nbsp;Yan Piaw Chua,&nbsp;Jin Hua Zhang","doi":"10.1519/JPT.0000000000000388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Sarcopenia is a common muscle disease among the older population, posing an increased risk for functional decline and intervention for loss of independence in daily living. Early detection of sarcopenia among older people before functional decline would be beneficial in enhancing their quality of life. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019 recommends the use of 3 screening methods for community-based sarcopenia detection: calf circumference (CC), or the Strength, Assistance in walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs, and Falls (SARC-F) questionnaire, or the SARC-F in combination with CC (SARC-CalF) questionnaire. This study aims to compare the relative performance of these 3 methods as screening tools for sarcopenia within a community-dwelling older population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total number of 700 community-dwelling older adults participated in the current study. Muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance were measured with bioelectrical impedance analysis, handgrip strength, and gait speed, respectively. The AWGS 2019 criteria were considered the criterion standard The sensitivity/specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyses were determined for CC, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF to determine their relative diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sarcopenia was identified in 21.4% of participants according to the AWGS2019 criteria. The overall prevalence of sarcopenia was 56.6%, 14.7%, and 22.9% according to CC, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF, respectively. Calf circumference showed the highest sensitivity but lowest specificity based on AWGS 2019 as the criterion standard regardless of age, gender, and body mass index. The SARC-CalF showed better sensitivity but similar specificity than the SARC-F. The AUROC of CC was significantly better than that of SARC-F and SARC-CalF. The AUROCs of CC, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF were statistically significant in all populations, as well as in the categories of age, gender, and body mass index ( P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Calf circumference is useful in ruling out the presence of sarcopenia while the SARC-F is more effective in ruling in sarcopenia, especially in the context of population-based screening. Future studies should be carried out to investigate the value of population-based sarcopenia detection using these screening tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":49035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Sarcopenia is a common muscle disease among the older population, posing an increased risk for functional decline and intervention for loss of independence in daily living. Early detection of sarcopenia among older people before functional decline would be beneficial in enhancing their quality of life. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019 recommends the use of 3 screening methods for community-based sarcopenia detection: calf circumference (CC), or the Strength, Assistance in walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs, and Falls (SARC-F) questionnaire, or the SARC-F in combination with CC (SARC-CalF) questionnaire. This study aims to compare the relative performance of these 3 methods as screening tools for sarcopenia within a community-dwelling older population.

Methods: A total number of 700 community-dwelling older adults participated in the current study. Muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance were measured with bioelectrical impedance analysis, handgrip strength, and gait speed, respectively. The AWGS 2019 criteria were considered the criterion standard The sensitivity/specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyses were determined for CC, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF to determine their relative diagnostic performance.

Results: Sarcopenia was identified in 21.4% of participants according to the AWGS2019 criteria. The overall prevalence of sarcopenia was 56.6%, 14.7%, and 22.9% according to CC, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF, respectively. Calf circumference showed the highest sensitivity but lowest specificity based on AWGS 2019 as the criterion standard regardless of age, gender, and body mass index. The SARC-CalF showed better sensitivity but similar specificity than the SARC-F. The AUROC of CC was significantly better than that of SARC-F and SARC-CalF. The AUROCs of CC, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF were statistically significant in all populations, as well as in the categories of age, gender, and body mass index ( P < .05).

Conclusions: Calf circumference is useful in ruling out the presence of sarcopenia while the SARC-F is more effective in ruling in sarcopenia, especially in the context of population-based screening. Future studies should be carried out to investigate the value of population-based sarcopenia detection using these screening tools.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国老年社区居民肌肉减少症的检测。
背景和目的:骨骼肌减少症是老年人群中常见的肌肉疾病,导致功能下降和日常生活独立性丧失的干预风险增加。在老年人功能衰退之前及早发现骨骼肌减少症将有利于提高他们的生活质量。2019年亚洲肌肉减少症工作组(AWGS)建议使用3种筛查方法进行社区肌肉减少症检测:小腿围(CC),或力量、行走辅助、从椅子上站起来、爬楼梯和跌倒(SARC-F)问卷,或SARC-F与CC (SARC-CalF)问卷相结合。本研究旨在比较这3种方法在社区居住的老年人群中作为肌肉减少症筛查工具的相对性能。方法:共有700名居住在社区的老年人参与了本研究。肌肉质量、肌肉力量和身体表现分别通过生物电阻抗分析、握力和步态速度进行测量。以AWGS 2019标准为标准,对CC、SARC-F和SARC-CalF进行敏感性/特异性、受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)曲线和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)分析,确定其相对诊断效能。结果:根据AWGS2019标准,21.4%的参与者发现了肌肉减少症。根据CC、SARC-F和SARC-CalF,肌肉减少症的总体患病率分别为56.6%、14.7%和22.9%。以AWGS 2019为标准,无论年龄、性别、体重指数如何,小腿围的敏感性最高,特异性最低。与SARC-F相比,SARC-CalF具有更好的敏感性和相似的特异性。CC的AUROC明显优于SARC-F和SARC-CalF。CC、SARC-F和SARC-CalF的auroc在所有人群以及年龄、性别和体重指数类别中均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:小腿围围有助于排除肌肉减少症的存在,而SARC-F对肌肉减少症的诊断更有效,特别是在以人群为基础的筛查中。未来的研究应进一步探讨使用这些筛查工具检测基于人群的肌肉减少症的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy is the leading source of clinically applicable evidence for achieving optimal health, wellness, mobility, and physical function across the continuum of health status for the aging adult. The mission of the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy is building a community that advances the profession of physical therapy to optimize the experience of aging.
期刊最新文献
A Scoping Review of the Predictive Qualities of Walking Speed in Older Adults. Associations of Usual and Fast Gait Speed With Physical Performance and Balance Confidence in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Implications for Assessment. Simple Mobility Tests Predict Use of Assistive Devices in Older Adults. Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS): Assessing Stair Function in Older Adults. The Power of Language: Words to Mend or Fuel Ageism Within Geriatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1