Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-07-13 Print Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.012222
Emil H Schemitsch, Ashesh Kumar, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Sheila Sprague, Mohit Bhandari, Gordon Guyatt, David W Sanders, Marc Swiontkowski, Paul Tornetta, Stephen Walter
{"title":"Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?","authors":"Emil H Schemitsch, Ashesh Kumar, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Sheila Sprague, Mohit Bhandari, Gordon Guyatt, David W Sanders, Marc Swiontkowski, Paul Tornetta, Stephen Walter","doi":"10.1503/cjs.012222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with a tibial shaft fracture experiencing their first postoperative complication following treatment with intramedullary nails may be at greater risk of subsequent complications than the whole population. We aimed to determine whether the initial method of nail insertion influences outcome in patients with a tibial shaft fracture requiring multiple reoperations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Tibial Shaft Fractures trial data, we categorized patients as those not requiring reoperation, those requiring a single reoperation and those requiring multiple reoperations, and we compared them by nail insertion technique (reamed v. unreamed) and fracture type (open v. closed). We then determined the number of patients whose first reoperation was in response to infection, and we compared other clinical outcomes between the reamed and unreamed groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1226 patients included in this analysis, 175 (14.27%) experienced a single reoperation and 44 patients (3.59%) underwent multiple reoperations. Nail insertion techniques (reamed v. unreamed) did not play a role in the need to perform multiple reoperations. Seventy-five percent of patients requiring multiple reoperations had open tibial shaft fractures. An equal number of these were reamed and unreamed insertions. The majority of patients had their course complicated by infection and almost 50% of patients whose first reoperation was for infection required more than 2 reoperations for management. The rest required multiple procedures for nonunion or bone loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings corroborate those of other studies, in which open fracture type rather than nail insertion technique was found to be the cause of morbidity following intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov, no. NCT00038129.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"66 4","pages":"E384-E389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b6/93/066E384.PMC10355994.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.012222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with a tibial shaft fracture experiencing their first postoperative complication following treatment with intramedullary nails may be at greater risk of subsequent complications than the whole population. We aimed to determine whether the initial method of nail insertion influences outcome in patients with a tibial shaft fracture requiring multiple reoperations.

Methods: Using the Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Tibial Shaft Fractures trial data, we categorized patients as those not requiring reoperation, those requiring a single reoperation and those requiring multiple reoperations, and we compared them by nail insertion technique (reamed v. unreamed) and fracture type (open v. closed). We then determined the number of patients whose first reoperation was in response to infection, and we compared other clinical outcomes between the reamed and unreamed groups.

Results: Among 1226 patients included in this analysis, 175 (14.27%) experienced a single reoperation and 44 patients (3.59%) underwent multiple reoperations. Nail insertion techniques (reamed v. unreamed) did not play a role in the need to perform multiple reoperations. Seventy-five percent of patients requiring multiple reoperations had open tibial shaft fractures. An equal number of these were reamed and unreamed insertions. The majority of patients had their course complicated by infection and almost 50% of patients whose first reoperation was for infection required more than 2 reoperations for management. The rest required multiple procedures for nonunion or bone loss.

Conclusion: Our findings corroborate those of other studies, in which open fracture type rather than nail insertion technique was found to be the cause of morbidity following intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures.

Clinical trial registration: www.

Clinicaltrials: gov, no. NCT00038129.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胫骨干骨折扩钉与未扩钉的比较:初始钉入方法对需要再手术患者的预后有影响吗?
背景:胫骨干骨折患者在髓内钉治疗后首次出现术后并发症的风险可能高于整体人群。我们的目的是确定最初的钉入方法是否会影响需要多次再手术的胫骨干骨折患者的预后。方法:采用前瞻性评价扩髓内钉治疗胫骨骨干骨折试验资料的研究,将患者分为无需再手术、单次再手术和多次再手术,并按钉入方式(扩髓与未扩髓)和骨折类型(开放性与闭合性)进行比较。然后,我们确定了因感染而进行第一次再手术的患者数量,并比较了扩孔组和未扩孔组的其他临床结果。结果:本组1226例患者中,单次再手术175例(14.27%),多次再手术44例(3.59%)。钉入技术(扩孔或未扩孔)在需要进行多次再手术中不起作用。75%需要多次再手术的患者有开放性胫干骨折。这些插入物中有相同数量的是扩孔的和未扩孔的。大多数患者的病程伴有感染,近50%因感染而再次手术的患者需要2次以上的再手术治疗。其余的则需要多次手术治疗骨不连或骨质流失。结论:我们的研究结果证实了其他研究的结果,在这些研究中发现开放性骨折类型而不是钉入技术是胫骨骨折髓内钉治疗后发病的原因。临床试验注册:www.Clinicaltrials: gov;NCT00038129。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
期刊最新文献
Is pneumonectomy still relevant for non-small cell lung cancer? Long-term overall survival from a 15-year experience. The burden of trauma in Eeyou Istchee (Cree territories, James Bay): epidemiology, transfers, and patient outcomes. The impact of socioeconomic status on the management of rotator cuff tears in a publicly funded health care system. "Bring your own" reusables to surgery: an environmental sustainability quality-improvement initiative. Pre- and postsurgery measurements of continuous muscle compartment pressure in patients with extremity trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1